scholarly journals Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Develop Malignancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danwen Yang ◽  
Natanong Thamcharoen ◽  
Francesca Cardarelli
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Impact

The risk of cancer increases after transplantation. However, the consensus on immunosuppression (IS) adjustment after diagnosis of malignancy is lacking. Our study aims to assess the impact of IS adjustment on mortality of post-kidney transplant patients and allograft outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the data in our center of 110 subjects. Our results showed IS dose adjustment was not statistically associated with mortality risk (HR 1.94, 95%CI 0.85–4.41, p = 0.12), and chemotherapy was the only factor that was significantly related to mortality (HR 2.3, 95%CI 1.21–4.35, p = 0.01). IS reduction was not statistically associated with worsening graft function (OR 3.8, 95%CI 0.77–18.71, p = 0.10), nor with graft survival (SHR 4.46, 95%CI 0.58–34.48, p = 0.15) after variables adjustment. Creatinine at cancer diagnosis and history of rejection were both negatively associated with graft survival (SHR 1.72, 95%CI 1.28–2.30, p < 0.01 and SHR 3.44, 95%CI 1.25–9.49, p = 0.02). Reduction of both mycophenolate and calcineurin inhibitors was associated with worsening graft function and lower graft survival in subgroup analysis (OR 6.14, 95%CI 1.14–33.15, p = 0.04; HR 17.97, 95%CI 1.81–178.78, p = 0.01). In summary, cancer causes high mortality and morbidity in kidney transplant recipients; the importance of cancer screening should be emphasized.

scholarly journals Impact of antiretroviral therapy on clinical outcomes in HIV+ kidney transplant recipients: Review of 58 cases

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana Rosa ◽  
Jose F. Suarez ◽  
Marco A. Lorio ◽  
Michele I. Morris ◽  
Lilian M. Abbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) poses challenging drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressant agents in transplant recipients.  We aimed to determine the impact of specific antiretroviral regimens in clinical outcomes of HIV+ kidney transplant recipients. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large academic center. Subjects included 58 HIV- to HIV+ adult, first-time kidney transplant patients. The main intervention was ART regimen used after transplantation.  The main outcomes assessed at one- and three-years were: patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and biopsy-proven acute rejection; we also assessed serious infections within the first six months post-transplant. Results: Patient and graft survival at three years were both 90% for the entire cohort. Patients receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimens had lower patient survival at one and three years than patients receiving PI-sparing regimens: 85% vs. 100% (p=0.06) and 82% vs. 100% (p=0.03), respectively. Patients who received PI-containing regimens had twelve times higher odds of death at 3 years compared to patients who were not exposed to PIs (odds ratio, 12.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1602; p=0.02).  Three-year death-censored graft survival was lower in patients receiving PI vs. patients on PI-sparing regimens (82 vs 100%, p=0.03). Patients receiving integrase strand transfer inhibitors-containing regimens had higher 3-year graft survival. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection by ART regimen. Individuals receiving PIs had a higher incidence of serious infections compared to those on PI-sparing regimens (39 vs. 8%, p=0.01). Conclusions: PI-containing ART regimens are associated with adverse outcomes in HIV+ kidney transplant recipients.

scholarly journals Effect of Remdesivir on COVID-19 PCR Positivity and Cycle Threshold in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-293
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Winstead ◽  
Johanna Christensen ◽  
Sara Sterling ◽  
Megan Morales ◽  
Dhiren Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cycle Threshold ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Patients ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
New Diagnosis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Median Change

Information regarding Coronavirus disease 2019 in the transplant population is lacking. Recently it has been suggested that cycle threshold values obtained on polymerase chain reaction tests may serve as a marker of disease severity with lower values (i.e., higher viral load) being associated with higher mortality. This study was done to assess the impact of remdesivir use on the time to a negative COVID-19 PCR as well as the degree of change between two Ct’s based on treatment. A total of 30 kidney transplant patients with a new diagnosis of COVID-19 were assessed. Serial PCR results were followed from the time of diagnosis then every 2–4 weeks until negative. In patients who received remdesivir immediately after COVID-19 confirmation compared to no remdesivir, time to negative PCR was not statistically different with a median duration of 57 days in both groups (p = 0.369). The change in the Ct between the first and the second PCR test was also not statistically different between groups with a median change of 18.4 cycles in the remdesivir group and 15.7 cycles without remdesivir (p = 0.516). The results of this small single-center analysis suggest that remdesivir may not be beneficial in shortening time to a negative COVID-19 PCR.

scholarly journals Is delayed graft function associated with ureteral stenosis in the kidney transplant recipient? A case-control study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Cayetano-Alcaraz ◽  
Juan Sebastian Rodriguez-Alvarez ◽  
Mario Vilatobá-Chapa ◽  
Josefina Alberú-Gómez ◽  
Bernardo Gabilondo-Pliego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipient ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Kidney Transplant Patients ◽  
Control Study

Introduction: Ureteral stricture (US) in the kidney transplant recipient is a rare complication that can lead to morbidity and graft loss. Risk factor recognition is crucial in the prevention and management of this entity. Delayed graft function (DGF), as defined by the need for dialysis in the first week after transplantation, has been proposed as a risk factor in previous studies. Our objective is to determine the impact of DGF in US development in kidney transplant patients. Methods: We designed a matched case-control study. US cases in kidney transplant recipients were identified in the 2008–2017 period. We defined US as the rise in serum creatinine associated with findings suggesting obstruction in ultrasound, scintigraphy, or retrograde pyelogram; any other cause of graft dysfunction was excluded. Controls were defined as kidney transplant recipients from the same population and period without US, matched in a 1:2 fashion by age, sex, and donor type. Results: From 532 kidney transplant patients, 31 cases and 62 controls were included. Cumulative US incidence was 58 per 1000 cases. When calculating for odds ratio (OR), post-operative urinoma (OR 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36–4.37) and ureteral duplication (OR 3.29; 95% CI 2.40–4.51) were associated with an increased risk for US, while DGF was not found to be statistically significant as a risk factor (OR 3.3; 95% CI 0.96–11.52). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in other pre- and post-transplant-related factors. Conclusions: DGF was not associated with US in our cohort; however, ureteral duplication and postoperative urinoma were associated with an increased risk of graft ureteral stenosis development.

scholarly journals Impact of Acute Rejection on Kidney Allograft Outcomes in Recipients on Rapid Steroid Withdrawal

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Heilman ◽  
S. Nijim ◽  
H. A. Chakkera ◽  
Y. Devarapalli ◽  
A. A. Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Steroid Withdrawal ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Protocol Biopsy ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact

Background. Our aim was to study the impact of clinical acute rejection (CR) and subclinical rejection (SR) on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW).Methods. All patients who received a living or deceased donor kidney transplant and were treated with RSW were included. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. Biopsies with Banff borderline changes were included with the rejection groups.Results. 457 kidney transplant recipients treated with RSW were included; 46 (10%) experienced SR, and 36 (7.8%) had CR. Mean HLA mismatch was significantly higher in the CR group. The Banff grade of rejection was higher in the CR group. There was a larger proportion of patients in both rejection groups with the combination of IFTA and persistent inflammation on the follow-up protocol biopsy done at 1 year. The estimated 5-year death-censored graft survival was 81% in SR, 78% in CR, and 97% in the control group (P<.0001). Significant differences were observed in allograft survival between the CR and control group (HR 9.06, 95% CI 3.39–24.2) and between the SR and control group (HR 4.22, 95% CI 1.30–13.7).Conclusion. Both SR and CR are associated with an inferior graft survival in recipients on RSW.

scholarly journals Effect of CYP3A4*22, POR*28, and PPARA rs4253728 on Sirolimus In Vitro Metabolism and Trough Concentrations in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 1761-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Woillard ◽  
Nassim Kamar ◽  
Sandra Coste ◽  
Lionel Rostaing ◽  
Pierre Marquet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitor ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Patients ◽  
Trough Concentrations ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Recent studies have identified new candidate polymorphisms in the genes related to CYP3A activity or calcineurin inhibitor dose requirements in kidney transplant recipients. These genes and polymorphisms are CYP3A4 (cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 4) (rs35599367-C&gt;T; *22); POR [P450 (cytochrome) oxidoreductase] (rs1057868-C&gt;T; *28); and PPARA (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha) (rs4253728-G&gt;A). We investigated the impact of these polymorphisms on sirolimus (SRL) in vitro hepatic metabolism, SRL trough concentrations (C0), and SRL adverse events in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS The clinical study included 113 stable kidney transplant patients switched from a calcineurin inhibitor to SRL (SRL C0 measured at 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter). We investigated SRL metabolism in vitro using human liver microsomes derived from individual donors (n = 31). Microsomes and patients were genotyped by use of Taqman® allelic discrimination assays. The effects of polymorphisms and covariates were studied using multilinear regression imbedded in linear mixed-effect models or logistic regressions. RESULTS In vitro, the CYP3A4*22 allele resulted in approximately 20% lower metabolic rates of SRL (P = 0.0411). No significant association was found between CYP3A4, CYP3A5, or PPARA genotypes and SRL dose, C0, or C0/dose in kidney transplant patients. POR*28 was associated with a minor but significant decrease in SRL log-transformed C0 [CT/TT vs CC, β = −0.15 (0.05); P = 0.0197] but this did not have any impact on the dose administered, which limited the relevance of the finding. After adjustment for nongenetic covariates and correction for false discovery finding, none of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms tested showed significant association with SRL adverse events. CONCLUSIONS These recently described polymorphisms do not seem to substantially influence the pharmacokinetics of SRL or the occurrence of SRL adverse events in kidney transplant recipients.

scholarly journals The Protective Role of Protocol Biopsy for Allograft Kidney Maintenance in Kidney Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Okjoo Lee ◽  
Kyo Won Lee ◽  
Jae Berm Park ◽  
Jung Eun Lee ◽  
Na Young Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Protocol Biopsy ◽  
Kidney Disease Progression

Abstract Many studies have reported that protocol biopsy (PB) may help preserve kidney function in kidney transplant recipients. Early detection and treatment of subclinical rejection may reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy and graft failure. However, no consensus has been reached regarding PB effectiveness, timing, and policy. This study aimed to evaluate the protective role of routine PB performed 2 weeks and 1 year after kidney transplantation. We reviewed 854 kidney transplant recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2007 and August 2017, with PBs planned at 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the trends in graft function, chronic kidney disease progression, new-onset chronic kidney disease, infection, and patient and graft survival between the 504 patients who underwent PB and 350 who did not undergo PB. The PB group was again divided into two groups: the single PB group (n = 207) and the double PB group (n = 297). In the PB group, the donors and recipients were significantly older and there was a greater presence of recipient diabetes mellitus and donor hypertension, donor-specific antigen, and a higher proportion of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations. The PB group was significantly different from the no-PB group in terms of the trends in graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that PB did not significantly improve graft survival or overall patient survival. However, in the multivariate Cox analysis, the double PB group had advantages in graft survival, chronic kidney disease progression, and new-onset chronic kidney disease. PB can play a protective role in the maintenance of kidney grafts in kidney transplant recipients.

scholarly journals Posttransplantation Anemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Uzi Gafter
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Hemoglobin Level ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Optimal Target ◽  
Kidney Transplant Patients ◽  
Anemia Treatment

Posttransplantation anemia (PTA) is common among kidney transplant patients. Early PTA is usually defined as anemia which develops up to 6 months after transplantation, and late PTA is defined as anemia which develops after 6 months. There are multiple causes, with iron deficiency being the major contributor. The occurrence of late PTA has been associated with impaired graft function. Early PTA has been shown to be a predictor of late PTA. PTA is associated with reduced mortality, reduced graft survival, and a decline in GFR. The association with mortality is related to the severity of the anemia and to specific causes of anemia. Treatment of PTA should probably begin as soon as possible after kidney transplantation. The optimal target hemoglobin level in kidney transplant recipients with anemia is higher than recommended in chronic kidney disease and should probably be up to 12.5–13 g/dL. In order to achieve this target, appropriate treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) and iron is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document