scholarly journals Developing an Evaluation Framework for Selecting Optimal Medical Devices

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhyeok Park ◽  
Eungdo Kim ◽  
Kwangsoo Shin
Keyword(s):  
Medical Device ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
General Evaluation ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Specific Assessment ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The objective of this study is to summarize the current general evaluation process that stakeholders use to evaluate single or multiple medical devices to select the optimal medical device. This study constructed a novel evaluation framework to select the optimal medical device by overcoming the limitations of assessments that were previously confined to the medical device cycle and the purpose of the specific assessment. It also presents a general framework for incorporating usability evaluations into the frame to reflect the objectives and characteristics of key stakeholders in the medical device industry. In addition, the results of medical device evaluation are further analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP).

Analisis Evaluasi Kinerja Vendor Berdasarkan Penetapan Kriteria Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada PT. XYZ

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Nadya Uci Pramita ◽  
Adhitomo Wirawan
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Quality Cost ◽  
Questionnaire Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of performance evaluation of vendors especially in the vendor that provides a raw material for pressure vessel plate made of carbon steel. As for the evaluation process undertaken by PT. XYZ through performance indicators (KPI) where an evaluation that applied a focus on quality and delivery. In this study, researchers used the designation criteria vendor performance indicator (VPI) where the criteria used consist of quality, cost, delivery, flexibility and responsiveness (QCDFR). The methods used in the analysis process that is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Data collecting directionally by questionnaire method among 3 respondents on the procurement department that know the performance of the vendors over the years. The result showed that PT. RE has the best performance among the four vendors, as known PT.SS, PT. ST, PT. CH and PT. UN within value 0.540; The vendor with lowest performance owned by PT.CH within value 0.034.Keyword : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (vpi), plate pressure vessel, vendor performance evaluation Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses evaluasi kinerja vendor khususnya pada vendor yang mensupplai bahan baku plate pressure vessel berbahan carbon steel. Adapun proses evaluasi yang dilakukan oleh PT. XYZ melalui key performance indicator (KPI) dimana evaluasi yang diterapkan hanya berfokus pada quality dan delivery. Dalam studi ini, peneliti menggunakan penetapan kriteria Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) dimana kriteria yang digunakan yaitu quality, cost, delivery, flexibility dan responsiveness (QCDFR). Metode yang digunakan dalam proses analisis yaitu Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Pengambilan data menggunakan kuisioner terhadap 3 informan pada departemen procurement yang dianggap mengetahui kinerja vendor selama ini. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. RE memiliki kinerja yang terbaik diantara keempat vendor yaitu PT. SS, PT. ST, PT. CH serta PT. UN dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.540 sedangkan vendor dengan kinerja terendah dimiliki oleh PT. CH dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.034.Kata kunci : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (VPI), plate pressure vessel, evaluasi kinerja vendor.

scholarly journals Multi Criteria Evaluation Framework for Prioritizing Indian Railway Stations Using Modified Rough AHP-Mabac Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haresh Kumar Sharma ◽  
Jagannath Roy ◽  
Samarjit Kar ◽  
Olegas Prentkovskis
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Railway Stations ◽  
Validity Testing ◽  
Multi Criteria Evaluation ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Indian Railway ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Abstract This study proposes a hybrid multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology for evaluating the performance of the Indian railway stations (IRS). Since the customers are heterogeneous and their requirements are often imprecise, the evaluation process is a critical step for prioritizing the IRS. To improve the existing approaches, an efficient evaluation technique has been proposed by integrating rough numbers, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-attribute border approximation area comparison (MABAC) methods in rough environment. The relative criteria weights based on their preferences given by experts is determined by rough AHP whereas evaluation of the alternatives based on these criteria are done by the modified rough MABAC method. A case study of prioritizing different railway stations in India is provided to demonstrate the efficiency and applicability of the proposed method. Among different criteria “proactively” is observed to be the most important criteria in our analysis, followed by ‘Railfanning’ and ‘DMO’ is found to be the best among the forty IRS in this study. Finally, a comparative analysis and validity testing of the proposed method are elaborated and the methodology provides a standard to select IRS on the basis of different criteria.

scholarly journals ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS SEBAGAI EVALUASI SUPPLIER ALAT KESEHATAN DAN OBAT – OBATAN DI RUMAH SAKIT MUHAMMADIYAH

MANAJERIAL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Past Performance ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Performance Payment ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Supplier selection is one of the important things in purchasing activities for companies, because the selection of suppliers is very influential on the quality of a product. One way to choose the right supplier for the company can be done using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, the Analytical Hierrarchy Process method is a decision-making method developed to give priority to several alternatives when several criteria must be considered. Some things to consider in choosing suppliers such as: shipping, quality, service, past performance, payment. This research was conducted at one of Muhammadiyah's charitable businesses, namely at the Muhammadiyah Hospital or Clinic. This study aims to find out the best supplier for Muhammadiyah Hospital. This study uses a quantitative descriptive research approach. With the use of samples from this study is the decision making in the purchase of drugs and medical devices Clinic or Muhammadiyah Hospital. The results of the data analysis concluded that the indicators of quality, acceleration of service, credibility of suppliers are bets in determining the best suppliers for the procurement of drugs and medical devices clinics or hospitals Muhammadiyah. Whereas from the overall simulation results Supplier Q is considered as the best supplier for Muhammadiyah Hospital, because overall of all criteria Supplier Q has the highest value compared to other suppliers.    

scholarly journals Determining the Priority of Medical Equipment Maintenance with Analytical Hierarchy Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfa Omega Hutagalung ◽  
Sawarni Hasibuan
Keyword(s):  
Medical Devices ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Medical Equipment ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Equipment Maintenance ◽  
Critical Weight ◽  
Safe Condition ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Medical Equipment Maintenance

The best quality of services provided by health care facilities can be realized if medical devices are in a reliable and safe condition. A large number of medical devices and the use of various types of medical devices have been a problem for hospital management to decide the level of priority in carrying out medical equipment maintenance. The purpose of the maintenance is to increase their availability and to reduce maintenance costs. This study aims to show how to determine the priority level of medical device maintenance based on the calculation of the criticality scores of medical devices. The criticality scores are obtained based on the assessment of criteria, sub-criteria, and grade by using the method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The devices with higher critical weight take higher priority for maintenance than devices with lower critical weight. The approach was applied for 20 medical devices at the Out Patient Department of Eye Hospital in Jakarta to describe how to prioritize the maintenance of medical devices.

scholarly journals Combination Analytical Hierarchy Process and Multy Factor Evaluation Process For Determining Promotion of Position

2018 ◽  
Vol 1114 ◽  
pp. 012079
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ardiansyah Sembiring ◽  
Andy Sapta ◽  
Guntur Maha Putra ◽  
Hambali ◽  
Afdhal Syafnur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Factor Evaluation ◽  
Hierarchy Process

scholarly journals Evaluation Framework for Key Performance Indicators of Railway ITS

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomislav Josip Mlinarić ◽  
Boban Đorđević ◽  
Evelin Krmac
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Intelligent Transportation Systems ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Intelligent Transportation ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Transportation Systems ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Mode Of Transportation ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The aim of this study is to develop a framework for investigating a comprehensive set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the assessment of railway Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The framework is established through four main steps: (1) development of a comprehensive set of KPIs for railway ITS; (2) validation of developed KPIs and collection of judgments from experts through a Delphi questionnaire; (3) evaluation of KPIs weights for assessing railway ITS with the Group Analytical Hierarchy Process (GAHP); and (4) presentation of a SWOT analysis for the developed KPIs by the authors. The results of the framework are presented as a set of 25 indicators for evaluation of railway ITS and their impacts. The framework could be helpful for selecting KPIs of ITS in another mode of transportation. Monitoring of the contributions of ITS towards sustainable railway can be achieved by a developed set of indicators which are classified in accordance with sustainable dimensions.

scholarly journals Assessment of Software Project Proposal using Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Framework

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boluwaji Akinnuwesi ◽  
Faith-michael Uzoka
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Optimal Performance ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Software Project ◽  
Application Software ◽  
Project Proposal ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Priority Weights ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Introduction: Application software helps organizations to perform effectively and efficiently in the competitive environment and hence provide value-added services to customers. High significance of application software stimulates organizations to carrying out thorough evaluation of software project proposals that vendors submit with the view of selecting best proposal with optimal performance when implemented. This process entails a number of assessment criteria, multiple conflicting goals, and increasingly turbulent environment. Therefore the need arises for the use of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for assessment. Aim: This research focused on development of AHP based model for software project proposal assessment and select proposal that guarantees optimal performance when implemented. Materials and Methods: AHP process was divided into 3 phases: Decomposition phase for identification of decision alternatives and evaluation criteria; Measurement of Preference phase for identifying relative importance of criteria using pairwise comparison matrix; and Synthesis phase to establish percentage of relative priorities for ranking proposals and select the best. Results: 64 variables were established and were hierarchically arranged into 4 levels based on degree of preference. It was evident from the priority graph that functionality (35.26%), quality (22.00%) and usability (19.34%) had the higher priority weights, while cost (2.47%) and vendor services (6.26%) had the least. Conclusion: AHP based software project proposal evaluation framework was presented whereby functionality, quality and usability have more consideration than cost elements in the assessment of software projects. Future work attempts to include organizations size, type of business, and experience criteria in the AHP model and implement the framework.

scholarly journals Perbandingan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi Kasus: Promosi Jabatan di Biro Kepegawaian Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung)

MIND Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-121
Author(s):  
UUNG UNGKAWA ◽  
RIDHO FARUQI ◽  
NUR FITRIANTI F
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Dalam sistem pendukung keputusan, banyak dijumpai metode untuk mengevaluasi pilihan dalam mengambil keputusan. Dua di antaranya adalah metode Multifactor Evaluation Process (MFEP) dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Dalam paper ini disajikan perbandingan keduanya baik secara prosedural maupun hasil akhir dalam pemberian peringkat karyawan di Biro Kepegawaian Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas) Bandung. Hasil menunjukkan, bahwa metode AHP lebih komplek dibanding MFEP sedangkan hasil pemeringkatan diperoleh perbedaan di peringkat empat dan lima dari lima karyawan yang dievaluasi. Kata kunci: Multifactor Evaluation Process, Analytical Hierarchy Process, sistem pendukung keputusan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document