scholarly journals Second-Generation Androgen Receptor Antagonists as Hormonal Therapeutics for Three Forms of Prostate Cancer

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 2448
Author(s):  
Pravien Rajaram ◽  
Alyssa Rivera ◽  
Kevin Muthima ◽  
Nicholas Olveda ◽  
Hubert Muchalski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Rational Design ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Fda Approval

Enzalutamide is the first second-generation nonsteroidal androgen receptor (AR) antagonist with a strong binding affinity to AR. Most significantly, enzalutamide can prolong not only overall survival time and metastatic free survival time for patients with lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but also castration-resistant free survival time for patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). Enzalutamide has thus been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of both metastatic (in 2012) and non-metastatic (in 2018) CRPC, as well as CSPC (2019). This is an inspiring drug discovery story created by an amazing interdisciplinary collaboration. Equally important, the successful clinical use of enzalutamide proves the notion that the second-generation AR antagonists can serve as hormonal therapeutics for three forms of advanced prostate cancer. This has been further verified by the recent FDA approval of the other two second-generation AR antagonists, apalutamide and darolutamide, for the treatment of prostate cancer. This review focuses on the rational design and discovery of these three second-generation AR antagonists, and then highlights their syntheses, clinical studies, and use. Strategies to overcome the resistance to the second-generation AR antagonists are also reviewed.

scholarly journals Next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097813
Author(s):  
Pernelle Lavaud ◽  
Clément Dumont ◽  
Constance Thibault ◽  
Laurence Albiges ◽  
Giulia Baciarello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Recent Advances

Until recently, continuing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and closely monitoring patients until evolution towards metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were recommended in men with non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). Because delaying the development of metastases and symptoms in these patients is a major issue, several trials have investigated next-generation androgen receptor (AR) axis inhibitors such as apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide in this setting. This review summarizes the recent advances in the management of nmCRPC, highlighting the favourable impact of next-generation AR inhibitors on metastases-free survival, overall survival and other clinically meaningful endpoints.

scholarly journals Treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: focus on second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Martin Bögemann ◽  
Kazuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Neal Shore
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Conventional Imaging ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Consensus Statements

Abstract Background Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined as a rising prostate-specific antigen concentration, despite castrate levels of testosterone with ongoing androgen-deprivation therapy or orchiectomy, and no detectable metastases by conventional imaging. Patients with nmCRPC progress to metastatic disease and are at risk of developing cancer-related symptoms and morbidity, eventually dying of their disease. While patients with nmCRPC are generally asymptomatic from their disease, they are often older and have chronic comorbidities that require long-term concomitant medication. Therefore, careful consideration of the benefit–risk profile of potential treatments is required. Methods In this review, we will discuss the rationale for early treatment of patients with nmCRPC to delay metastatic progression and prolong survival, as well as the factors influencing this treatment decision. We will focus on oral pharmacotherapy with the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, and the importance of balancing the clinical benefit they offer with potential adverse events and the consequential impact on quality of life, physical capacity, and cognitive function. Results and conclusions While the definition of nmCRPC is well established, the advent of next-generation imaging techniques capable of detecting hitherto undetectable oligometastatic disease in patients with nmCRPC has fostered debate on the criteria that inform the management of these patients. However, despite these developments, published consensus statements have maintained that the absence of metastases on conventional imaging suffices to guide such therapeutic decisions. In addition, the prolonged metastasis-free survival and recently reported positive overall survival outcomes of the three second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors have provided further evidence for the early use of these agents in patients with nmCRPC in order to delay metastases and prolong survival. Here, we discuss the benefit–risk profiles of apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide based on the data available from their pivotal clinical trials in patients with nmCRPC.

scholarly journals The Current Landscape of Treatment in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955491983392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joelle El-Amm ◽  
Jeanny B Aragon-Ching
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Early Data ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Variable Potential

Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with variable potential in developing into overt metastases. It is an area of increased unmet need in advanced prostate cancer and for which there had been no great treatments until recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of 2 novel anti-androgens apalutamide and enzalutamide, which were both approved given benefit in metastasis-free survival. Early data on the use of darolutamide, another novel anti-androgen, are also explored. This review discusses the pivotal trials that led to the approval of apalutamide and enzalutamide in the nmCRPC setting and discusses the key promises and challenges with the use of these agents.

Metastasis free survival in older men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor inhibitors: An FDA-pooled analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12038-12038
Author(s):  
Harpreet Singh ◽  
Lijun Zhang ◽  
Anup Amatya ◽  
Yutao Gong ◽  
Daniel L. Suzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Older Men ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Time To Initiation

12038 Background: The FDA has approved three androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) based on improvements in metastasis-free survival (MFS). MFS is an earlier endpoint, defined as the time from randomization to either imaging-detectable distant disease or death. This pooled analysis examines MFS, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTCyto), and safety outcomes in men over 80 treated with AR inhibitors. Methods: Data was pooled from three randomized controlled studies (n=4117) of AR inhibitors for nmCRPC. The treatment effect of AR inhibitors on MFS and TTCyto across age groups was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Hazard Ratios for MFS and TTCyto were adjusted for baseline ECOG, total Gleason score, PSA doubling time, and prior bone-targeting therapy. Results: For patients age 80 years or older (n=675) who were treated with AR inhibitors, the hazard ratio was 0.38 (95% CI 0.29, 0.49) with an estimated median MFS of 40 months (95% CI 36, 41) versus 22 months (95% CI 18, 29) for those treated with placebo (n=348). For patients <80 (n=2019) treated with AR inhibitors, the HR was 0.31 (95% CI 0.27, 0.36) with an estimated median MFS of 41 months (95% CI 36, NR) versus 16 months (95% CI 15, 18) for those treated with placebo (n=1075). Patients over 80 also derived similar improvements in time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (HR 0.43 95% CI 0.23, 0.82), compared to their younger counterparts (HR 0.41 95% CI 0.33, 0.50). See Table for selected safety outcomes. Conclusions: In an exploratory subgroup analysis, older men (≥80) with nmCRPC derived similar benefit in MFS and time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy with AR inhibitors compared with younger patients. Men age 80 and above experienced higher rates of Grade 3-4 adverse events, serious adverse events, falls, and fractures. This trend towards increased toxicity was observed regardless of treatment arm. Analysis of patient reported outcomes is ongoing. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Treatment Sequences of Androgen Receptor–Targeted Agents for Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khai Tran ◽  
Sarah McGill
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Treatment Sequences

No evidence was found on the treatment sequences of androgen receptor–targeted agents in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Evidence from retrospective studies, including those within a systematic review, suggests that sequential treatment of abiraterone followed by enzalutamide is more favourable than enzalutamide followed by abiraterone in improving clinical outcomes such as response rate and progression-free survival, but not overall survival, in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Evidence from a retrospective study suggests that docetaxel-containing treatment sequences with androgen receptor–targeted agents may improve progression-free survival compared to sequential therapy with androgen receptor–targeted agents alone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Evidence from a retrospective study did not reveal differences in clinical outcomes of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with sequential androgen receptor–targeted agents with or without interposed chemotherapy or radium-223. These findings were in line with those observed in a 2019 CADTH report.1 However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to low-quality evidence. No comparative cost-effectiveness studies were identified.

Efficacy of docetaxel and androgen receptor axis-targeted agents in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 150-150
Author(s):  
Akiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Masashi Kato ◽  
Toyonori Tsuzuki ◽  
Momokazu Gotoh
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Intraductal Carcinoma ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Prostate ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Time Of Administration

150 Background: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of docetaxel and androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P). Methods: We retrospectively identified 311 CRPC patients from June 2002 to February 2016. All patients were initially administered with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), followed by docetaxel or ARAT (abiraterone or enzalutamide) after progressing to CRPC. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) from the time of CRPC diagnosis and progression-free survival (PFS) from the time of administration of docetaxel or ARAT. Results: IDC-P was found in 180 of 311 patients. The median OS was 33.4 and 64.0 months with and without IDC-P, respectively (hazards ratio [HR], 2.14; P < 0.001). For the first treatment for CRPC, docetaxel was administered to 71 and 50 patients with and without IDC-P, respectively, with a median OS of 30.4 and 64.0 months, respectively (HR, 2.62; P < 0.001). ARAT was administered to 109 and 81 patients with and without IDC-P, respectively, with a median OS of 45.0 and 69.9 months, respectively (HR, 1.84; P = 0.017). Regarding patients with IDC-P, the OS in patients who were administered with ARAT was longer than that in those administered with docetaxel (HR, 0.58; P = 0.008). The median PFS was 7.5 and 12.1 months with and without IDC-P, respectively (HR, 1.36; P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that the prognostic factors for OS were the presence of IDC-P (HR, 1.91; P < 0.001), and administration of ARAT (HR, 0.66; P = 0.02). Conclusions: The presence of IDC-P is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in CRPC patients. ARAT may prolong OS in CRPC patients with IDC-P.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document