scholarly journals Strategies for Enhancing Polyester-Based Materials for Bone Fixation Applications

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 992
Author(s):  
Raasti Naseem ◽  
Charalampos Tzivelekis ◽  
Matthew J. German ◽  
Piergiorgio Gentile ◽  
Ana M. Ferreira ◽  
...  

Polyester-based materials are established options, regarding the manufacturing of bone fixation devices and devices in routine clinical use. This paper reviews the approaches researchers have taken to develop these materials to improve their mechanical and biological performances. Polymer blending, copolymerisation, and the use of particulates and fibre bioceramic materials to make composite materials and surface modifications have all been studied. Polymer blending, copolymerisation, and particulate composite approaches have been adopted commercially, with the primary focus on influencing the in vivo degradation rate. There are emerging opportunities in novel polymer blends and nanoscale particulate systems, to tune bulk properties, and, in terms of surface functionalisation, to optimise the initial interaction of devices with the implanted environment, offering the potential to improve the clinical performances of fracture fixation devices.

2005 ◽  
Vol 284-286 ◽  
pp. 893-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melba Navarro ◽  
E.S. Sanzana ◽  
Josep A. Planell ◽  
M.P. Ginebra ◽  
P.A. Torres

Resorbable calcium phosphate glasses offer interesting solutions in the biomedical field, as bone cavity fillers, drug delivery systems, biodegradable reinforcing phase in the case of composites for bone fixation devices and tissue engineering scaffolds. In this work, two different glass formulations in the systems 44.5CaO-44.5P2O5-(11-X)Na2O-XTiO2 (X=0or 5) have been elaborated. It is known that the incorporation or TiO2 into the vitreous system reduces considerably the solubility of the glasses. To study the material solubility effect on the in vivo response, glass particles of the two formulations were implanted in rabbits. Results showed that both glasses elicited a similar biological response and good biocompatibility. The percentage of new bone formation in the glasses was comparable to that obtained for the autologous bone (control) after 12 weeks of implantation. The materials showed to have an osteoconductive potential. Finally, this study showed that in spite of the solubility difference of the studied glasses, there were no significant differences in the in vivo response.


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 177-187
Author(s):  
Till Kämmerer ◽  
Tony Lesmeister ◽  
Victor Palarie ◽  
Eik Schiegnitz ◽  
Andrea Schröter ◽  
...  

Introduction: We aimed to compare implant osseointegration with calcium phosphate (CaP) surfaces and rough subtractive-treated sandblasted/acid etched surfaces (SA) in an in vivo minipig mandible model. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 cylindrical press-fit implants with two different surfaces (CaP, n = 18; SA, n = 18) were inserted bilaterally into the mandible of 9 adult female minipigs. After 2, 4, and 8 weeks, we analyzed the cortical bone-to-implant contact (cBIC; %) and area coverage of bone-to-implant contact within representative bone chambers (aBIC; %). Results: After 2 weeks, CaP implants showed no significant increase in cBIC and aBIC compared to SA (cBIC: mean 38 ± 5 vs. 16 ± 11%; aBIC: mean 21 ± 1 vs. 6 ± 9%). Two CaP implants failed to achieve osseointegration. After 4 weeks, no statistical difference between CaP and SA was seen for cBIC (mean 54 ± 15 vs. 43 ± 16%) and aBIC (mean 43 ± 28 vs. 32 ± 6). However, we excluded two implants in each group due to failure of osseointegration. After 8 weeks, we observed no significant intergroup differences (cBIC: 18 ± 9 vs. 18 ± 20%; aBIC: 13 ± 8 vs. 16 ± 9%). Again, three CaP implants and two SA implants had to be excluded due to failure of osseointegration. Conclusion: Due to multiple implant losses, we cannot recommend the oral mandibular minipig in vivo model for future endosseous implant research. Considering the higher rate of osseointegration failure, CaP coatings may provide an alternative to common subtractive implant surface modifications in the early phase post-insertion.


Author(s):  
Julieta L. Merlo ◽  
María R. Katunar ◽  
María Florencia Tano de la Hoz ◽  
Sabrina Carrizo ◽  
Leandro Salemme Alonso ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1263-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Roach ◽  
David Eglin ◽  
Kirsty Rohde ◽  
Carole C. Perry

2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 1157-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwatoyin A. Adeleke ◽  
Yahya E. Choonara ◽  
Lisa C. Du Toit ◽  
Viness Pillay

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 952-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Mohn ◽  
Duygu Ege ◽  
Kirill Feldman ◽  
Oliver D. Schneider ◽  
Thomas Imfeld ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document