scholarly journals Template-Based Step Detection with Inertial Measurement Units

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 4033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Oudre ◽  
Rémi Barrois-Müller ◽  
Thomas Moreau ◽  
Charles Truong ◽  
Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Detection Algorithm ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Step Detection ◽  
Medical Context ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
End Times

This article presents a method for step detection from accelerometer and gyrometer signals recorded with Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). The principle of our step detection algorithm is to recognize the start and end times of the steps in the signal thanks to a predefined library of templates. The algorithm is tested on a database of 1020 recordings, composed of healthy subjects and patients with various neurological or orthopedic troubles. Simulations on more than 40,000 steps show that the template-based method achieves remarkable results with a 98% recall and a 98% precision. The method adapts well to pathological subjects and can be used in a medical context for robust step estimation and gait characterization.

scholarly journals Accuracy and Repeatability of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Measured with an Inertial Measurement Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1804
Author(s):  
Jorge Posada-Ordax ◽  
Julia Cosin-Matamoros ◽  
Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias ◽  
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo ◽  
Laura Esteban-Gonzalo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
High Speeds ◽  
Controlled Conditions ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Accuracy And Repeatability

In recent years, interest in finding alternatives for the evaluation of mobility has increased. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) stand out for their portability, size, and low price. The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy and repeatability of a commercially available IMU under controlled conditions in healthy subjects. A total of 36 subjects, including 17 males and 19 females were analyzed with a Wiva Science IMU in a corridor test while walking for 10 m and in a threadmill at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h, 3.2 km/h, 4 km/h, and 4.8 km/h for one minute. We found no difference when we compared the variables at 4 km/h and 4.8 km/h. However, we found greater differences and errors at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and the latter one (1.6 km/h) generated more error. The main conclusion is that the Wiva Science IMU is reliable at high speeds but loses reliability at low speeds.

scholarly journals Personalized Template-Based Step Detection From Inertial Measurement Units Signals in Multiple Sclerosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau ◽  
Laurent Oudre ◽  
Albane Moreau ◽  
Flavien Quijoux ◽  
Sébastien Edmond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Step Detection ◽  
Measurement Units

scholarly journals Automatic pairing of inertial sensors to lower limb segments – a plug-and-play approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 715-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Graurock ◽  
Thomas Schauer ◽  
Thomas Seel
Keyword(s):  
Sensor Networks ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Correct Pairing ◽  
Measurement Units

AbstractInertial sensor networks enable realtime gait analysis for a multitude of applications. The usability of inertial measurement units (IMUs), however, is limited by several restrictions, e.g. a fixed and known sensor placement. To enhance the usability of inertial sensor networks in every-day live, we propose a method that automatically determines which sensor is attached to which segment of the lower limbs. The presented method exhibits a low computational workload, and it uses only the raw IMU data of 3 s of walking. Analyzing data from over 500 trials with healthy subjects and Parkinson’s patients yields a correct-pairing success rate of 99.8% after 3 s and 100% after 5 s.

scholarly journals Feasibility of a Sensor-Based Gait Event Detection Algorithm for Triggering Functional Electrical Stimulation during Robot-Assisted Gait Training

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (21) ◽  
pp. 4804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Schicketmueller ◽  
Georg Rose ◽  
Marc Hofmann
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Functional Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Event Detection ◽  
Gait Training ◽  
Detection Algorithm ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Rehabilitation Process ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Measurement Units

Technologies such as robot-assisted gait trainers or functional electrical stimulation can improve the rehabilitation process of people affected with gait disorders due to stroke or other neurological defects. By combining both technologies, the potential disadvantages of each technology could be compensated and simultaneously, therapy effects could be improved. Thus, an algorithm was designed that aims to detect the gait cycle of a robot-assisted gait trainer. Based on movement data recorded with inertial measurement units, gait events can be detected. These events can further be used to trigger functional electrical stimulation. This novel setup offers the possibility of equipping a broad range of potential robot-assisted gait trainers with functional electrical stimulation. The aim of this paper in particular was to test the feasibility of a system using inertial measurement units for gait event detection during robot-assisted gait training. Thus, a 39-year-old healthy male adult executed a total of six training sessions with two robot-assisted gait trainers (Lokomat and Lyra). The measured data from the sensors were analyzed by a custom-made gait event detection algorithm. An overall detection rate of 98.1% ± 5.2% for the Lokomat and 94.1% ± 6.8% for the Lyra was achieved. The mean type-1 error was 0.3% ± 1.2% for the Lokomat and 1.9% ± 4.3% for the Lyra. As a result, the setup provides promising results for further research and a technique that can enhance robot-assisted gait trainers by adding functional electrical stimulation to the rehabilitation process.

scholarly journals A Comparative Evaluation of Inertial Sensors for Gait and Jump Analysis

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 5990
Author(s):  
Isaia Andrenacci ◽  
Riccardo Boccaccini ◽  
Alice Bolzoni ◽  
Giulio Colavolpe ◽  
Cosimo Costantino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standardized Tests ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Physical Tests ◽  
Measurement Units

Gait and jump anomalies are often used as indicators to identify the presence and state of disorders that involve motor symptoms. Physical tests are often performed in specialized laboratories, which offer reliable and accurate results, but require long and costly analyses performed by specialized personnel. The use of inertial sensors for gait and jump evaluation offers an easy-to-use low-cost alternative, potentially applicable by the patients themselves at home. In this paper, we compared three inertial measurement units that are available on the market by means of well-known standardized tests for the evaluation of gait and jump behavior. The aim of the study was to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each of the tested sensors, considered in different tests, by comparing data collected on two healthy subjects. Data were processed to identify the phases of the movement and the possible inaccuracies of each sensor. The analysis showed that some of the considered inertial units could be reliably used to identify the gait and jump phases and could be employed to detect anomalies, potentially suggesting the presence of disorders.

scholarly journals Using Inertial Measurement Units and Electromyography to Quantify Movement during Action Research Arm Test Execution

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Repnik ◽  
Urška Puh ◽  
Nika Goljar ◽  
Marko Munih ◽  
Matjaž Mihelj
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Movement Time ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Trunk Stability ◽  
Movement Smoothness ◽  
Trajectory Similarity ◽  
Measurement Units

In patients after stroke, ability of the upper limb is commonly assessed with standardised clinical tests that provide a complete upper limb assessment. This paper presents quantification of upper limb movement during the execution of Action research arm test (ARAT) using a wearable system of inertial measurement units (IMU) for kinematic quantification and electromyography (EMG) sensors for muscle activity analysis. The test was executed with each arm by a group of healthy subjects and a group of patients after stroke allocated into subgroups based on their clinical scores. Tasks were segmented into movement and manipulation phases. Each movement phase was quantified with a set of five parameters: movement time, movement smoothness, hand trajectory similarity, trunk stability, and muscle activity for grasping. Parameters vary between subject groups, between tasks, and between task phases. Statistically significant differences were observed between patient groups that obtained different clinical scores, between healthy subjects and patients, and between the unaffected and the affected arm unless the affected arm shows normal performance. Movement quantification enables differentiation between different subject groups within movement phases as well as for the complete task. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient shows strong correlations between patient’s ARAT scores and movement time as well as movement smoothness. Weak to moderate correlations were observed for parameters that describe hand trajectory similarity and trunk stability. Muscle activity correlates well with grasping activity and the level of grasping force in all groups.

scholarly journals Analysis of ergonomic and unergonomic human lifting behaviors by using Inertial Measurement Units

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Kuschan ◽  
Henning Schmidt ◽  
Jörg Krüger
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Musculoskeletal System ◽  
Occupational Diseases ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Main Components

Abstract:This paper presents an analysis of two distinct human lifting movements regarding acceleration and angular velocity. For the first movement, the ergonomic one, the test persons produced the lifting power by squatting down, bending at the hips and knees only. Whereas performing the unergonomic one they bent forward lifting the box mainly with their backs. The measurements were taken by using a vest equipped with five Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) with 9 Dimensions of Freedom (DOF) each. In the following the IMU data captured for these two movements will be evaluated using statistics and visualized. It will also be discussed with respect to their suitability as features for further machine learning classifications. The reason for observing these movements is that occupational diseases of the musculoskeletal system lead to a reduction of the workers’ quality of life and extra costs for companies. Therefore, a vest, called CareJack, was designed to give the worker a real-time feedback about his ergonomic state while working. The CareJack is an approach to reduce the risk of spinal and back diseases. This paper will also present the idea behind it as well as its main components.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document