scholarly journals Potential Contribution of Sponsoring State and Its National Legislation to the Deep Seabed Mining Regime

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 10784
Author(s):  
Xiangxin Xu ◽  
Guifang (Julia) Xue
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Potential Contribution ◽  
State Party ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
The Status ◽  
Deep Seabed Mining ◽  
Seabed Mining ◽  
Clear Line ◽  
The Unclos

Companies and legal persons intending to conduct activities in the Area must be sponsored by a State Party of the UNCLOS, which constitute a “dual-track mechanism” with ISA as a primary regulator and sponsoring state as a secondary regulator. This regime setting places companies and legal persons subject to international and national legislation simultaneously. The sponsoring state’s national legislation is thus an integrated part of the DSM regime. This resolves the defects that private entities in DSM are not subject to international law and weak enforcement of international organizations. However, UNCLOS neither draws a clear line of competence between the sponsoring state and the ISA nor provides compulsory components that national legislation should contain, resulting in the disparity between the objective of the establishment of sponsorship and the status quo of the sponsoring state’s role and its national legislation. This paper analyzes the competence of a sponsoring state and regulatory aspects it should focus on to assist the ISA and further proposes such components of the national legislation contributing to the DSM regime.

ASEAN and Its Problematic Treaty-Making Practice: Can International Organizations Conclude Treaties “on Behalf of” Their Member States?

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhida CHEN
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Southeast Asian ◽  
The Other ◽  
Member States ◽  
The Real ◽  
Asean Member ◽  
Real Issue ◽  
The Status

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has, on various occasions, concluded treaties on behalf of its Member States. This raises some interesting questions: is ASEAN entitled to enter into treaties on behalf of its Member States; and if so, what should be the status of ASEAN and its Member States vis-à-vis the other party to the treaty? The issue is not one of whether the ASEAN Member States have consented to such a practice—it must be assumed that they have. Instead, the real issue is whether such treaty-making practice can and should be valid under international law, even if the Member States have consented for ASEAN to conclude these treaties on their behalf. This paper will argue that, under international law, ASEAN is entitled to conclude treaties on behalf of its Member States.

International Law within the Israel Legal System

1990 ◽  
Vol 24 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 451-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Lapidoth
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
Laws Of War ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Military ◽  
State Of Israel ◽  
High Seas

Since the establishment of the State and up to the present day, Israeli law has had to deal with a great number of various problems in the field of international law, e.g. whether the State of Israel is a successor to the obligations of the Mandatory government; the jurisdiction of the Israeli courts with regard to offences committed in demilitarized zones or beyond the State's boundaries (on the high seas or abroad); the immunity of foreign states and their representatives from the jurisdiction of Israeli courts and from measures of execution; the status of international organizations and of their employees; the effect and implications of official acts performed within the territory of a state which is at war with Israel; the effect of international treaties in Israel; the question whether the Eastern neighbourhoods of Jerusalem are part of Israel; various issues concerning extradition, and of course, many questions regarding the laws of war: the powers of the military governor, and in particular his power to expropriate land in the territories under Israeli control and to expel residents from the territories, the extent of his legislative powers, etc.

scholarly journals Brexit and the International Law Prohibitions on the Loss of eu Citizenship

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Thomas Worster
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law

This submission challenges the presumption that uk nationals will lose eu citizenship following Brexit. Until now, the dominant narrative has been drawn from the law on treaties or international organizations, and this article adds the human rights perspective to Brexit. Firstly, eu citizenship can be assimilated to nationality. While eu citizenship is unique, the status protected under international law is a legal bond a person has with a political entity. This protection certainly covers nationality, and this paper argues it can be understood to also protect eu citizenship. Secondly, international law prohibits arbitrary withdrawal of this legal bond with a person. The uk does not have jurisdiction over eu citizenship, so it is doubtful the uk can terminate eu citizenship unilaterally. Even if the eu were to withdraw eu citizenship on its initiative, it would still constitute retroactive law, discrimination, and infringement of sovereignty. It is also disproportionate, because the loss of eu citizenship is not necessary for Brexit. When Greenland withdrew from the eu, its residents retained eu citizenship. For these reasons, the revocation of eu citizenship would be arbitrary. A distinction must be made between the membership of a state in the eu which can be terminated, and the direct legal bond formed between a person and the Union, which is far harder to revoke. On this basis, any uk national who has acquired eu citizenship prior to Brexit, should not be divested of it following Brexit.

The Fortieth Session of the International Law Commission

1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Mccaffrey
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
State Responsibility ◽  
Draft Code ◽  
Peace And Security ◽  
The Status ◽  
International Liability ◽  
International Law Commission ◽  
Law Commission

The International Law Commission of the United Nations held its 40th session from May 9 to July 29, 1988, under the Chairmanship of Ambassador Leonardo Díaz-González. The Commission adopted 6 articles of the Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind and 14 articles on the law of non-navigational uses of international watercourses. Substantial time was devoted to both international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law and the status of the diplomatic courier and the diplomatic bag not accompanied by diplomatic courier. Reports on jurisdictional immunities of states and their property and state responsibility were introduced by the special rapporteurs for those topics but were not discussed by the Commission owing to lack of time. The remaining substantive item on the Commission’s agenda, relations between states and international organizations (second part of the topic), was not considered at this session. Finally, the Commission once again devoted substantial time to reviewing its procedures and methods of work.

The Scarborough Shoal Dispute: An Analysis of the Dispute Resolution Mechanisms under International Law

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RODEL A. TATON
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Choice Of Procedure ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
The Status ◽  
Rules And Principles ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Unclos

This comes at a time when the stand-off over the Scarborough Shoal has matured to the status of an international dispute. It involves rivaling claims on points of law or fact between the People’s Republic China (PRC) and the Republic of the Philippines (RP). PRC calls the shoal as Huangyan island while RP refers to it as Bajo de Masinloc or Panatag Shoal as advanced and published in their respective governmental positions, albeit their claims for de facto sovereignty and territory. Employing mainly descriptive, historical, documentary and content analyses techniques, this dwells on (a) the character of Scarborough Shoal in the perspective of international law, (b) the conflicting claims of the PRC and RP with their respective governmental positions, (c) the mechanisms for settlement of an international dispute as provided for by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and (d) whether or not the Philippines can avail of the said remedies and how can the Scarborough Shoal be settled employing international law, rules and principles. The UNCLOS provides for a mechanism in Part XV, for settlement of disputes, ranging from the pacific modes of dispute settlement to resort to compulsory mechanisms entailing binding decisions. It is also provided that sans a choice of procedure, only Arbitration under Annex VII, the Hamburg Tribunal, is available, and this, the Philippines followed when it submitted its notification and statement of claims. Based on the international jurisprudence on related issues, there are rarely a winner and a loser. However, having studied the current situation principally in the light of the UNCLOS III, which favors the position of the Philippines, one is forced to recognize that oceans and their basic rules - droit de la mer- existed before UNCLOS. Certainly, the final settlement of the issues hereinbefore presented will go beyond the confines of UNCLOS.Keywords: Social Sciences, International disputes, Law of the Sea, descriptive design,Philippine-China Relations, UNCLOS, Philippines, Southeast Asia

scholarly journals O Papel do Institut du Droit International e da International Law Association na Codificação das normas do Direito Internacional de Águas: entre hard law e soft law

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (39) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gildo Manuel Espada
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Soft Law ◽  
Water Law ◽  
Hard Law ◽  
The Status ◽  
International Water Law ◽  
International Water ◽  
Droit International ◽  
Vital Resource

RESUMOA importância da água como recurso vital para a humanidade e as disputas sobre o acesso a este recurso são cada vez mais intensas. Aliado a estes factos, acontece que grande parte dos recursos de água do planeta faz parte de recursos hídricos partilhados entre dois ou mais Estados. Este facto fez com que algumas organizações internacionais, mormente o Institut du Droit International e a International Law Association se esforçassem em codificar o Direito Internacional de Águas. Entretanto, apesar de todo o esforço feito, as normas aprovadas não obtiveram o estatuto de hard law, sendo aplicadas na qualidade de normas de soft law. Discutimos aqui a validade e importância de tais normas, no âmbito da Codificação do Direito de Águas. Para tal, fazemos um levantamento bibliográfico que visa o resgate histórico do surgimento do Direito de Águas, e trazemos importantes conceitos aplicáveis à temática. PALAVRAS-CHAVECodificação. Direito. Águas. ABSTRACTThe importance of water as a vital resource for humanity and the disputes over access to this resource are increasingly intense. Together with these facts, a large part of the planet´s water resources are shared between two or more States. These facts have led to a number of international organizations, including the Institut de Droit International and the International Law Association to embark in efforts to codify the International water Law.  However, despite all the efforts made, the rules adopted did not obtain the status of hard law, being only accepted and applied as soft law. We discuss here the validity and importance of such standards, within the framework of the codification of water law. To do this, we make a bibliographical research that aims to review the emergence of Water Law historically, and to bring important concepts applicable to this thematic. KEYWORDSCodification. Law. Water.

Chronology of Practice: Chinese Practice in Public International Law in 2018*

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-931
Author(s):  
Xiaohui Wu
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
International Conventions ◽  
Foreign Ministry

Abstract This Survey covers materials reflecting Chinese practice in 2018 relating to: treaties, agreements and other documents signed or ratified by the People’s Republic of China; national legislation; statements made by Chinese representatives at the meetings of the UN and other international organizations, international conferences, and those made by the Foreign Ministry spokespersons, with respect to various branches of international law; and judicial decisions, in particular on the applicability and application of international conventions, by Chinese courts.

A Methodological Approach to Deep Seabed Mining by Non-state Actors

2021 ◽  
pp. 11-42
Author(s):  
Joanna Dingwall
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
International Investment ◽  
International Investment Law ◽  
International Legal System ◽  
State Actors ◽  
Deep Seabed Mining ◽  
Seabed Mining

Chapter 1 places this study within its broader methodological framework. Firstly, it offers a method of analysis for evaluating the deep seabed mining regime, drawing on the international legal system more generally, and including elements of formalism and the New Haven approach. Secondly, it provides a methodological perspective on one of this study’s key strands: the role of non-state actors (specifically, corporations). It does so by addressing the terminology concerning non-state actors and corporate entities; considering the means by which corporate nationality can be established as a matter of international law (including by reference to the law of diplomatic protection, international investment law and the concept of flag state nationality); assessing the role of corporations within the international legal system; and providing an initial analysis of the necessary conditions for corporate rights and corporate obligations under international law. This analysis provides the necessary conceptual backdrop against which this book can evaluate the role of corporate activities within deep seabed mining.

THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NATIONAL LAW IN THE FIRST ITALIAN PROSECUTION OF PIRACY: THE M/V MONTECRISTO CASE

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 289-314
Author(s):  
Marta Bo
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Horn Of Africa ◽  
New Era ◽  
The Us ◽  
Un Security Council ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
State Cooperation ◽  
The Unclos

This note scrutinizes the complex relationship between international law and national criminal law in the prosecution of piracy. UN Security Council Resolutions on Somalia have marked the beginning of a new era in counter-piracy, with much wider involvement of States and international organizations in patrols in the Horn of Africa and with an increasing number of piracy trials in courts in Europe, the US, and Africa. Increased State cooperation in enforcement and adjudication has evinced the weaknesses and ambiguities inherent in the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which deal with piracy. This article questions the suitability of the UNCLOS definition of piracy as a standalone legal basis for detention in light of the requirements of legal certainty that must be satisfied in order to permit the arrest and the “pre-transfer arrest” of piracy suspects. This question seems to have been recently overlooked by the Italian Court of Cassation whose reasoning, while correct in relation to the assertion of jurisdiction over the pirates arrested on board the M/V Montecristo, seems flawed with regard to the assumption of jurisdiction over the pirates captured aboard the “mothership” and then transferred to Italy by the British unit participating to the NATO counter-piracy mission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document