scholarly journals Replication and Spread of Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus in Solid Tumors

Viruses ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Bangxing Hong ◽  
Upasana Sahu ◽  
Matthew P. Mullarkey ◽  
Balveen Kaur

Oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) is a highly promising treatment for solid tumors. Intense research and development efforts have led to first-in-class approval for an oHSV for melanoma, but barriers to this promising therapy still exist that limit efficacy. The process of infection, replication and transmission of oHSV in solid tumors is key to obtaining a good lytic destruction of infected cancer cells to kill tumor cells and release tumor antigens that can prime anti-tumor efficacy. Intracellular tumor cell signaling and tumor stromal cells present multiple barriers that resist oHSV activity. Here, we provide a review focused on oncolytic HSV and the essential viral genes that allow for virus replication and spread in order to gain insight into how manipulation of these pathways can be exploited to potentiate oHSV infection and replication among tumor cells.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3139-3139
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Jialin Tang ◽  
Qing Chang ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
...  

3139 Background: There have been limited reports concerning treatment outcomes of oncolytic viruses in solid tumors other than melanoma. OH2 is a genetically engineered oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 2 designed to selectively amplify in tumor cells and express GM-CSF to enhance tumor-specific immune responses. Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-center, phase 1 study. Eligible pts were 18-75 years of age; had histologically confirmed advanced solid tumor; had progressed after standard systemic treatments. Pts were required to have tumor(s) deemed safe to inject, with a longest diameter of at least 0.5cm. Other eligibility criteria included measurable lesion as per RECIST v1.1; ECOGPS score of 0-1 and adequate organ functions. A 3+3 dose-escalation strategy was used in the study and 3 dose levels (106, 107 and 108 CCID50/mL) of OH2 were assessed. OH2 was administered intratumorally every 3 weeks for the first cycle and every 2 weeks.Treatment may continue afterwards in ptswith potential clinical benefit at the discretion of the investigators. The primary objective was the safety and tolerability of OH2 injection as defined by the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) within the first 3 weeks of therapy, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included efficacy and immunogenicity of OH2. Results: 11 pts were enrolled between April 17, 2019 and November 4, 2019. The median follow-up duration was 8.36 months (95%CI: 5.64-11.08). OH2 was well-tolerated as no DLTs were reported and no MTD reached. Before the end of the DLT assessment period,1 pt withdrew consent, and 1 pt died of arrhythmia unrelated to OH2, with negative OH2 DNA copies in serum, urine and saliva samples. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) observed were of grade 1-2, except that 1 pt in the 108 CCID50/mL group developed grade 3 fever. The most common TRAEs were fever (n =5) and blood bilirubin level increase (n = 4). There were no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs. One pt(rectal cancer) had PR and 2 (appendix cancer and ovarian cancer) had SD as per RECIST v1.1. One patient (esophageal cancer) achieved iPR as per iRECIST criteria. The duration of follow-up for the 2 responders were 9.70 months and 8.36 months, respectively, and both had ongoing responses. Notably, regression of a non-injected lesion was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions: OH2 had a favorable safety profile with no DLTs and MTD. The dose expansion study in selected tumor types is currently underway. Clinical trial information: NCT03866525 .


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e86843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Megison ◽  
Lauren A. Gillory ◽  
Jerry E. Stewart ◽  
Hugh C. Nabers ◽  
Elizabeth Mroczek-Musulman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document