Low excitation spur gears with variable tip diameter

2021 ◽  
Vol 263 (5) ◽  
pp. 1275-1285
Author(s):  
Joshua Götz ◽  
Sebastian Sepp ◽  
Michael Otto ◽  
Karsten Stahl

One important source of noise in drive trains are transmissions. In numerous applications, it is necessary to use helical instead of spur gear stages due to increased noise requirements. Besides a superior excitation behaviour, helical gears also show additional disadvantageous effects (e.g. axial forces and tilting moments), which have to be taken into account in the design process. Thus, a low noise spur gear stage could simplify design and meet the requirements of modern mechanical drive trains. The authors explore the possibility of combining the low noise properties of helical gears with the advantageous mechanical properties of spur gears by using spur gears with variable tip diameter along the tooth width. This allows the adjustment of the total length of active lines of action at the beginning and end of contact and acts as a mesh stiffness modification. For this reason, several spur gear designs are experimentally investigated and compared with regard to their excitation behaviour. The experiments are performed on a back-to-back test rig and include quasi-static transmission error measurements under load as well as dynamic torsional vibration measurements. The results show a significant improvement of the excitation behaviour for spur gears with variable tip diameter.

2012 ◽  
Vol 215-216 ◽  
pp. 917-920
Author(s):  
Rong Fan ◽  
Chao Sheng Song ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Wen Ji Liu

Dynamic modeling of beveloid gears is less developed than that of spur gears, helical gears and hypoid gears because of their complicated meshing mechanism and 3-dimsional dynamic coupling. In this study, a nonlinear systematic coupled vibration model is created considering the time-varying mesh stiffness, time-varying transmission error, time-varying rotational radius and time-varying friction coefficient. Numerical integration applying the explicite Runge-Kutta formula and the implicit direct integration is used to solve the nonlinear dynamic model. Also, the dynamic characteristics of the marine gear system are investigated.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncai Lei ◽  
Xiannian Kong ◽  
Siyu Chen ◽  
Jinyuan Tang ◽  
Zehua Hu

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the dynamic responses of a spur gear pair with unloaded static transmission error (STE) excitation numerically and experimentally and the influences of the system factors including mesh stiffness, error excitation and torque on the dynamic transmission error (DTE). Design/methodology/approach A simple lumped parameters dynamic model of a gear pair considering time-varying mesh stiffness, backlash and unloaded STE excitation is developed. The STE is calculated from the measured tooth profile deviation under the unloaded condition. A four-square gear test rig is designed to measure and analyze the DTE and vibration responses of the gear pair. The dynamic responses of the gear transmission are studied numerically and experimentally. Findings The predicted numerical DTE matches well with the experimental results. When the real unloaded STE excitation without any approximation is used, the dynamic response is dominated by the mesh frequency and its high order harmonic components, which may not be result caused by the assembling error. The sub-harmonic and super-harmonic resonant behaviors are excited because of the high order harmonic components of STE. It will not certainly prevent the separations of mesh teeth when the gear pair is under the condition of high speed and heavy load. Originality/value This study helps to improve the modeling method of the dynamic analysis of spur gear transmission and provide some reference for the understanding of the influence of mesh stiffness, STE excitation and system torque on the vibration behaviors.


Author(s):  
Isaias Regalado ◽  
Donald R. Houser

Abstract The theoretical advantage of conjugate action in involute gears is lost due to the deflection of the teeth under load and due to manufacturing and assembling errors. These factors produce instantaneous variations in the gear ratio commonly referred to as transmission error. The transmission error has been proven to have a strong relationship with the noise emitted by the transmission. In order to reduce the transmission error, the contacting surfaces of the gears are modified to compensate for the deflections and errors. These modifications may be performed in the direction of the profile, the lead or in a more general sense it may be topographical (defined point by point). This paper describes a non-iterative procedure for the calculation of the modifications for minimum transmission error based on a predefined load distribution. The results presented agree with the common practice for spur gears of tip relief in the direction of the profile and crowning in the direction of the lead, but for helical gears the need for a more complicated modification is observed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-310
Author(s):  
Benny Thomas ◽  
K. Sankaranarayansamy ◽  
S. Ramachandra ◽  
Suresh Kumar S.P.

Asymmetric spur gears are finding application in many fields including aerospace propulsion and automobile which demand unidirectional or relatively higher load on one side of the gear flank. Design intend to maximise the load carrying capacity of the drive side of asymmetric gear by increasing the pressure angle is achieved at the expense of coast side capacity. Multiple solution for coast to drive side pressure angle exist for a given contact ratio and each of these have relative merits and demerits. In the present work asymmetric spur gears of theoretically equal contact ratio as that of corresponding symmetric gears are selected to investigate the change in gear tooth static transmission error and dynamic behaviour with coast and drive side pressure angle. Study shows that dynamic factor of normal contact ratio asymmetric spur gears below resonance speed are relatively lower than corresponding symmetric gears of same module, contact ratio, number of teeth, coast side pressure angle and fillet radii. Results also show that, coast and drive side pressure angle can be suitably selected for a given contact ratio to reduce the single tooth and double tooth contact static transmission error and dynamic factor of asymmetric spur gears.


Author(s):  
S Du ◽  
R B Randall ◽  
D W Kelly

A modified transmission error (TE) model is introduced for analysing the effects on the transmission error of variation of tooth body stiffness with load application point, and a simulation program for transmission error computation with varying stiffness has been developed. In order to obtain the case where the tooth deflection component is the dominant source of the TE, nylon gears were used in this study. All the simulation results have been compared with the measured transmission errors from a single-stage gearbox. Even though carried out on low precision gears, the validity of the model for the more flexible nylon gears indicates that the model can be used for analysing the transmission error of high-precision gear sets.


Author(s):  
Seney Sirichai ◽  
Ian Howard ◽  
Laurie Morgan ◽  
Kian Teh

Abstract This paper considers a Finite Element Model which is used to predict the torsional mesh stiffness and static transmission error of a pair of spur gears in mesh. The model involves the use of 2D plain strain elements, coupled with contact elements at the points of contact between the meshing teeth. A simple strategy of how to determine an appropriate value of the penalty parameter of the contact elements (gap element) is also presented. When gears are unloaded, a pinion and gear with perfect involute profiles, should theoretically run with zero transmission error. However, when gears with involute profiles are loaded, the individual torsional mesh stiffness of each gear changes throughout the mesh cycle, causing variations in angular rotation of the gear body and subsequent transmission error. The theoretical changes in the torsional mesh stiffness throughout the mesh cycle are developed using finite element analysis and related to the static transmission error. A 5mm through thickness tooth crack is also modelled, and the comparison of the torsional mesh stiffness and static transmission error with and without the tooth crack is discussed.


Author(s):  
Bing Yuan ◽  
Shan Chang ◽  
Geng Liu ◽  
Lan Liu ◽  
Lehao Chang

The numerical calculation model of time-varying mesh stiffness, static transmission error and composite mesh error of modified helical gears is developed based on loaded tooth contact analysis (LTCA) model. To minimize the fluctuation of vibration excitation force, the optimal modification parameters of three modification methods under designed applied torque and ideal tooth contact condition are determined, and the effects of three modification methods on time-varying mesh stiffness, static transmission error and composite mesh error are analyzed. In order to analyze the sensitivity of the three modification methods to applied torque and gear misalignment, the effects of applied torque in wide range and gear misalignment on vibration excitation force and dynamic transmission error are investigated. The results show that the difference of time-varying mesh stiffness, static transmission error, composite mesh error of helical gears with different modifications methods are obvious. However, the fluctuation of vibration excitation force of helical gears is reduced significantly. When the applied torque is higher than the designed applied torque, the three modification methods show a great reduction of system vibration. When the applied torque is too low, the vibration of modified helical gears is larger than unmodified ones. Meanwhile, the resonance speed of the helical gears is slightly lower. With the increase of gear misalignment, the resonance speed becomes lower correspondingly and the effect of the three modification methods on the reduction of vibration excitation force is not obvious any more. The results can provide effective reference for establishing robust optimization method for tooth surface modification.


Author(s):  
Rodney Glover

The main purpose of the supercharger timing gears is to keep the rotors from contacting each other. They are often lightly loaded and designed for low noise. As timing gears, they have by definition a ratio of 1.0. Furthermore, the timing gears are presently spur gears due to the cost of assembling helical gears onto the rotor shafts without allowing timing errors between the rotors. The original timing gear designs were spur gears with contact ratios slightly above 2.0. A major NVH issue has been gear whine noise, because most applications are in luxury vehicles and are evaluated with the hood open and the engine at idle. In this operating condition, the background noise is very low and any tonal gear whine noise is audible. The first effort was to push the gear manufacturing quality to the limits of modern grinding capability. In order to further reduce gear whine noise, the designs have evolved to finer pitch gearing with a contact ratio over 3.0 to reduce transmission error. Micro-geometries were optimized for low transmission error (TE) at low load. OSU Gear Lab’s RMC and LDP became primary tools in optimizing the gear designs for minimum TE. An important factor when increasing the contact ratio is to not increase the sliding friction significantly to keep the fixed oil sump temperature from increasing too much and cause wear issues in operation. Typically, the new high contact ratio spur gear designs in production have reduced the gear whine levels by more than 6 dB and have had very few noise complaints.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document