scholarly journals Inequalities in the distribution of the general practice workforce in England: a practice-level longitudinal analysis

BJGP Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. BJGPO.2021.0066
Author(s):  
Claire Nussbaum ◽  
Efthalia Massou ◽  
Rebecca Fisher ◽  
Marcello Morciano ◽  
Rachel Harmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Recent Trends ◽  
Unadjusted Analysis ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Deprived Areas

BackgroundIn England, demand for primary care services is increasing and GP shortages are widespread. Recently introduced primary care networks (PCNs) aim to expand the use of additional practice-based roles such as physician associates (PAs), pharmacists, paramedics, and others through financial incentives for recruitment of these roles. Inequalities in general practice, including additional roles, have not been examined in recent years, which is a meaningful gap in the literature. Previous research has found that workforce inequalities are associated with health outcome inequalities.AimTo examine recent trends in general practice workforce inequalities.Design & settingA longitudinal study using quarterly General Practice Workforce datasets from 2015–2020 in England.MethodThe slope indices of inequality (SIIs) for GPs, nurses, total direct patient care (DPC) staff, PAs, pharmacists, and paramedics per 10 000 patients were calculated quarterly, and plotted over time, with and without adjustment for patient need.ResultsFewer GPs, total DPC staff, and paramedics per 10 000 patients were employed in more deprived areas. Conversely, more PAs and pharmacists per 10 000 patients were employed in more deprived areas. With the exception of total DPC staff, these observed inequalities widened over time. The unadjusted analysis showed more nurses per 10 000 patients employed in more deprived areas. These values were not significant after adjustment but approached a more equal or pro-poor distribution over time.ConclusionSignificant workforce inequalities exist and are even increasing for several key general practice roles, with workforce shortages disproportionately affecting more deprived areas. Policy solutions are urgently needed to ensure an equitably distributed workforce and reduce health inequities.

scholarly journals Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (686) ◽  
pp. e595-e604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Hammersley ◽  
Eddie Donaghy ◽  
Richard Parker ◽  
Hannah McNeilly ◽  
Helen Atherton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Information Giving ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians

BackgroundGrowing demands on primary care services have led to policymakers promoting video consultations (VCs) to replace routine face-to-face consultations (FTFCs) in general practice.AimTo explore the content, quality, and patient experience of VC, telephone (TC), and FTFCs in general practice.Design and settingComparison of audio-recordings of follow-up consultations in UK primary care.MethodPrimary care clinicians were provided with video-consulting equipment. Participating patients required a smartphone, tablet, or computer with camera. Clinicians invited patients requiring a follow-up consultation to choose a VC, TC, or FTFC. Consultations were audio-recorded and analysed for content and quality. Participant experience was explored in post-consultation questionnaires. Case notes were reviewed for NHS resource use.ResultsOf the recordings, 149/163 were suitable for analysis. VC recruits were younger, and more experienced in communicating online. FTFCs were longer than VCs (mean difference +3.7 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1 to 5.2) or TCs (+4.1 minutes, 95% CI = 2.6 to 5.5). On average, patients raised fewer problems in VCs (mean 1.5, standard deviation [SD] 0.8) compared with FTFCs (mean 2.1, SD 1.1) and demonstrated fewer instances of information giving by clinicians and patients. FTFCs scored higher than VCs and TCs on consultation-quality items.ConclusionVC may be suitable for simple problems not requiring physical examination. VC, in terms of consultation length, content, and quality, appeared similar to TC. Both approaches appeared less ‘information rich’ than FTFC. Technical problems were common and, though patients really liked VC, infrastructure issues would need to be addressed before the technology and approach can be mainstreamed in primary care.

scholarly journals Setting the scene for paramedics in general practice: What can we expect?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal Mahtani ◽  
Georgette Eaton ◽  
Matthew Catterall ◽  
Alice Ridley
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Workforce ◽  
Clinical Complexity ◽  
Or Practice ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Gp Care

Primary care services in England may be reaching saturation point. Demands to see a GP or practice nurse have increased substantially. Clinical complexity has also increased; patients are living longer, but with more multimorbidity.(1) These demands are mirrored by a decline in the GP workforce, despite political pledges to reverse this.(2) New strategies are needed to tackle the current pressures in general practice and reduce the risks of harm to patients. The NHS England GP Forward View advocates investing and developing new models of care, including expansion of a multidisciplinary, integrated primary care team.(3) These recommendations reflect the findings of the Primary Care Workforce Commission, who highlighted the potential roles for clinical pharmacists, physician associates, and physiotherapists, all substituting into current GP care pathways.(4) The Commission also recommended that general practices should consider more opportunities to use the skills of paramedics in primary care. Specific roles may include running clinics, triaging and managing minor illnesses, as well as provide continuity for patients with complex health needs. Further roles may include assessment and management of requests for same-day urgent home visits, as well as regular visits to homebound patients with long-term conditions.The commision highlighted that these innovative roles should be subject to further evaluation. Nevertheless, historical and current perspectives allow us to model how the role could be fully used.

Advancing general practice nursing in Australia: roles and responsibilities of primary healthcare organisations

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riki Lane ◽  
Elizabeth Halcomb ◽  
Lisa McKenna ◽  
Nicholas Zwar ◽  
Lucio Naccarella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Leadership Development ◽  
Postgraduate Education ◽  
System Level ◽  
Delphi Consensus ◽  
Practice Nurses ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Australian General Practice

Objectives Given increased numbers and enhanced responsibilities of Australian general practice nurses, we aimed to delineate appropriate roles for primary health care organisations (PHCOs) to support this workforce. Methods A two-round online Delphi consensus process was undertaken between January and June 2012, informed by literature review and key informant interviews. Participants were purposively selected and included decision makers from government and professional organisations, educators, researchers and clinicians from five Australian states and territories Results Of 56 invited respondents, 35 (62%) and 31 (55%) responded to the first and second invitation respectively. Participants reached consensus on five key roles for PHCOs in optimising nursing in general practice: (1) matching workforce size and skills to population needs; (2) facilitating leadership opportunities; (3) providing education and educational access; (4) facilitating integration of general practice with other primary care services to support interdisciplinary care; and (5) promoting advanced nursing roles. National concerns, such as limited opportunities for postgraduate education and career progression, were deemed best addressed by national nursing organisations, universities and peak bodies. Conclusions Advancement of nursing in general practice requires system-level support from a range of organisations. PHCOs play a significant role in education and leadership development for nurses and linking national nursing organisations with general practices. What is known about the topic? The role of nurses in Australian general practice has grown in the last decade, yet they face limited career pathways and opportunities for career advancement. Some nations have forged interprofessional primary care teams that use nurses’ skills to the full extent of their scope of practice. PHCOs have played important roles in the development of general practice nursing in Australia and internationally. What does this paper add? This study delineates organisational support roles for PHCOs in strengthening nurses’ roles and career development in Australian general practice. What are the implications for practitioners? Effective implementation of appropriate responsibilities by PHCOs can assist development of the primary care nursing workforce.

scholarly journals Evaluation of primary care services in Hungary: a comprehensive description of provision, professional competences, cooperation, financing, and infrastructure, based on the findings of the Hungarian-arm of the QUALICOPC study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imre Rurik ◽  
Anna Nánási ◽  
Zoltán Jancsó ◽  
László Kalabay ◽  
Levente István Lánczi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Health Care Provision ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Process Indicators ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Background: Primary health care provision in terms of quality, equity, and costs are different by countries. The Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICOPC) study evaluated these domains and parameters in 35 countries, using uniformized method with validated questionnaires filled out by family physicians/general practitioners (GPs). This paper aims to provide data of the Hungarian-arm of the QUALICOPC study and to give an overview about the recent Hungarian primary care (PC) system. Methods: The questionnaires were completed in 222 Hungarian GP practices, delivered by fieldworkers, in a geographically representative distribution. Descriptive analysis was performed on the data. Findings: Financing is based mostly on capitation, with additional compensatory elements and minor financial incentives. The gate-keeping function is weak. The communication between GPs and specialists is often insufficient. The number of available devices and equipment are appropriate. Single-handed practices are predominant. Appointment instead of queuing is a new option and is becoming more popular, mainly among better-educated and urban patients. GPs are involved in the management of almost all chronic condition of all generations. Despite the burden of administrative tasks, half of the GPs estimate their job as still interesting, burn-out symptoms were rarely found. Among the evaluated process indicators, access, continuity, comprehensiveness, and coordination were rated as satisfactory, together with equity among health outcome indicators. Financing is insufficient; therefore, many GPs are involved in additional income-generating activities. The old age of the GPs and the lack of the younger GPs generation contributes to a shortage in manpower. Cooperation and communication between different levels of health care provision should be improved, focusing better on community orientation and on preventive services. Financing needs continuous improvement and appropriate incentives should be implemented. There is a need for specific PC-oriented guidelines to define properly the tasks and competences of GPs.

Polypharmacy perspectives in general practice environments

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 342-347
Author(s):  
Gerri Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Practice Nurses ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Medication Reviews ◽  
Funding Cuts

Practice nurses need to keep up-to-date with the latest prescribing guidelines, especially for patients taking multiple medications. Gerri Kaufman discusses some of the challenges facing polypharmacy and considers the roles of deprescription and medicines reviews Polypharmacy refers to the use of multiple medicines. A combination of medicines can be appropriate and beneficial for the patient; however, polypharmacy can also be problematic where the risk of harm outweighs the benefits of treatment. Polypharmacy is associated with increasing age, the presence of multi-morbidities, a culture of single condition guideline-based prescribing, obesity and lower wealth. Managing polypharmacy is a challenge for prescribers working in general practice and primary care. Polypharmacy is associated with adverse outcomes, including adverse drug reactions, falls, increased length of stay in hospital, and mortality. Vigilance around the safer aspects of prescribing, undertaking structured medication reviews and deprescribing are considered important in addressing issues with polypharmacy, and enhancing the management of patients on multiple medicines. Comprehensive guidance is available on the medication review process and deprescribing; however, the process is time-consuming, complex and requires investment. The NHS Long Term Plan put forward proposals to increase investment in primary care services, which include addressing medication safety. Workforce shortages and funding cuts for continuing professional development are both perceived as barriers to its implementation. Both individual prescribers and the systems in which they work are accountable for improving safe medicine use in polypharmacy.

scholarly journals Setting the scene for paramedics in general practice: What can we expect?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal Mahtani ◽  
Georgette Eaton ◽  
Matthew Catterall ◽  
Alice Ridley
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Workforce ◽  
Clinical Complexity ◽  
Or Practice ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Gp Care

Primary care services in England may be reaching saturation point. Demands to see a GP or practice nurse have increased substantially. Clinical complexity has also increased; patients are living longer, but with more multimorbidity.(1) These demands are mirrored by a decline in the GP workforce, despite political pledges to reverse this.(2) New strategies are needed to tackle the current pressures in general practice and reduce the risks of harm to patients. The NHS England GP Forward View advocates investing and developing new models of care, including expansion of a multidisciplinary, integrated primary care team.(3) These recommendations reflect the findings of the Primary Care Workforce Commission, who highlighted the potential roles for clinical pharmacists, physician associates, and physiotherapists, all substituting into current GP care pathways.(4) The Commission also recommended that general practices should consider more opportunities to use the skills of paramedics in primary care. Specific roles may include running clinics, triaging and managing minor illnesses, as well as provide continuity for patients with complex health needs. Further roles may include assessment and management of requests for same-day urgent home visits, as well as regular visits to homebound patients with long-term conditions.The commision highlighted that these innovative roles should be subject to further evaluation. Nevertheless, historical and current perspectives allow us to model how the role could be fully used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document