scholarly journals Predictors of Poor Quality of Life after Primary Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Perspective from a Developing Nation

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Nadeem Ahmad Siddiqui ◽  
Muhammad Asad Moosa ◽  
Fareed Ahmad Shaikh ◽  
Noman Shahzad ◽  
Shahid Nazir ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
RHW Strijkers ◽  
CWKP Arnoldussen ◽  
CHA Wittens

Introduction Acute thrombus removal therapies may reduce post-thrombotic syndrome in certain deep venous thrombosis patients. The LET classification is designed to identify patients at high risk for developing post-thrombotic syndrome in the acute phase using thrombus location and extent. This study evaluates the use of the LET classification to predict post-thrombotic syndrome in a cohort of patients after deep venous thrombosis. Methods A cohort of 660 deep venous thrombosis patients was invited to participate and fill out a questionnaire with Quality of life questionnaires, basic information, a modified self-assessment version of the Villalta scale for post-thrombotic syndrome and potential confounders. Original data on thrombus extension was available, and the LET classes were determined. Obtained information was analysed using ANOVA and in a multiple logistic regression model to correct for confounders. All different LET classes were compared to post-thrombotic syndrome occurrence, post-thrombotic syndrome prediction and disease specific quality of life scores (VEINES-Sym/Qol). Results Three hundred and fifteen patients responded, and in 309 a post-thrombotic syndrome score was distilled. LET I,II,III ( n = 63) had an odds ratio of 3.4(1.2–9.2) for predicting severe post-thrombotic syndrome, and LET II ( n = 17) had an odds ratio of 5.1(1.3–20.8) compared to LET class I ( n = 97). Both the VEINES-Sym and VEINES-Qol score were significantly lower for LET I,II,III compared to LET I, and LET II compared to LET I. Conclusion The LET classification can be used to classify patients according to acute thrombus location and extent. Extensive and centrally located (LET I,II,III) deep venous thrombosis showed the highest probability in developing severe post-thrombotic syndrome and lower disease specific quality of life.


2000 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Comerota ◽  
Richard C. Throm ◽  
Susan D. Mathias ◽  
Signe Haughton ◽  
Mark Mewissen

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed AH Taha ◽  
Andrew Busuttil ◽  
Roshan Bootun ◽  
Alun H Davies

Objectives The aim is to evaluate venous stent patency, the development of post-thrombotic syndrome, recurrence, quality of life and the optimal post-procedural anticoagulation regimen in the treatment of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Method and results EMBASE and Medline databases were interrogated to identify studies in which acute deep venous thrombosis patients were stented. Twenty-seven studies and 542 patients were identified. Primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates 12 months after stent placement ranged from 74 to 95, 90 to 95 and 84 to 100%, respectively. The observed post-thrombotic syndrome rate was 14.6%. The incidence of stent re-thrombosis was 8%. In 26% of studies, patients received additional antiplatelet therapy. Quality of life questionnaires employed in 11% of studies, demonstrating an improvement in the chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (22.67 ± 3.01 versus 39.34 ± 6.66). Conclusion Venous stenting appears to be an effective adjunct to early thrombus removal; however, further studies are needed to identify optimal anticoagulant regimen and effect on quality of life.


Author(s):  
Ewa Hedner ◽  
Jonas Carlsson ◽  
Károly R. Kulich ◽  
Lennart Stigendal ◽  
Anders Ingelgård ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inês Mendes-Andrade ◽  
Marina Dias-Neto ◽  
João Rocha-Neves ◽  
Armando Mansilha

Introduction: Post-thrombotic syndrome is a frequent and disabling complication of deep venous thrombosis. Its incidence is not described in the Portuguese population. The objective of this study is to report the incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome after the initial episode of deep venous thrombosis.Material and Methods: This is an observational, unicentric, retrospective cohort of patients who had a first episode of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limb, documented with duplex ultrasound (n = 101). The modified Villalta score was applied by phone interview for the diagnosis and staging of post-thrombotic syndrome. The quality of life of patients was measured with the modified CIVIQ 14 classification.Results: Median follow-up time was six years (interquartile range 1). Severe post-thrombotic syndrome was present in 27% of patients and moderate in 33%. Performing physical activity at the time of the interview was associated with lower incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (relative risk 0.489; 95% confidence interval = 0.320 - 0.748). Body weight gain after deep venous thrombosis (relative risk 2.188; 95% confidence interval 1.137 - 4.210) and lower education levels (relative risk 2.005; 95% confidence interval 1.297 - 3.098) were associated positively with post-thrombotic syndrome. Quality of life was 90 ± 17 vs 64 ± 18 vs 43 ± 15 in patients without postthrombotic syndrome, with moderate post-thrombotic syndrome and with severe post-thrombotic syndrome, respectively (p < 0.001).Discussion: The long-term incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome in a cohort of patients from Northern Portugal is higher than in other studies and correlates with worse adjusted CIVIQ-14 scores.Conclusion: Large studies of prospective nature could provide more definitive evidence.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 130-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H W Strijkers ◽  
C H A Wittens ◽  
S R Kahn

The post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a common, debilitating complication following deep venous thrombosis. PTS is a syndrome for which it has been difficult to provide a clear definition. PTS was defined as chronic venous signs/symptoms after a deep venous thrombosis. A number of scales are available to diagnose PTS, but there is a strong need for standardization. The Villalta scale was chosen as the standardized PTS scale. The Villalta scale has been validated in several studies and shows good correlation with generic and disease-specific quality of life scales. The inter-observer rate between study nurses and physicians was shown to be very good. Furthermore, the scale shows good discriminative properties among the different severity groups of PTS. The Villalta scale is useful for use in randomized controlled trials and it allows pooling of data from different studies. The Villalta scale should undergo further validation on intra-rater reliability. Ongoing randomized controlled trials will further validate the Villalta scale for use in PTS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document