scholarly journals Trends in coronary artery disease screening before kidney transplantation

Kidney360 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.34067/KID.0005282021
Author(s):  
Xingxing S. Cheng ◽  
Sai Liu ◽  
Jialin Han ◽  
Margaret R. Stedman ◽  
Glenn M. Chertow ◽  
...  

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) screening in asymptomatic kidney transplant candidates is widespread but not well supported by contemporary cardiology literature. We describe here temporal trends in CAD screening before kidney transplant in the United States. Methods: Using the United States Renal Data System, we examined Medicare-insured adults who received a first kidney transplant from 2000 through 2015. We stratified analysis based on whether the patient's comorbidity burden met guideline definitions of high-risk for CAD. We examined temporal trends in non-urgent CAD tests within the year prior to transplant and the composite of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction in the 30 days after transplant. Results: Of 94,832 kidney transplant recipients, 37,139 (39%) underwent at least one non-urgent CAD test in the 1 year prior to transplant. From 2000 to 2015, The transplant program waitlist volume had increased as transplant volume stayed constant, while patients in the later eras had slightly higher comorbidity burden (older, longer dialysis vintage, and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and CAD). The likelihood of CAD test in the year prior to transplant increased from 2000 through 2003 and remained relatively stable thereafter. When stratified by CAD risk status, test rates decreased modestly in high-risk patients but remained constant in low-risk patients after 2008. Death or non-fatal myocardial infarction within 30 days after transplant decreased from 3.4% in 2000 to 1.5% in 2015. Nuclear perfusion scan was the most frequent modality of testing throughout examined time periods. Conclusions: CAD testing rates before kidney transplantation have remained constant from 2000 through 2015 despite widespread changes in cardiology guidelines and practice.

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1516-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
AUSTIN G. STACK ◽  
WENDY E. BLOEMBERGEN

Abstract. Despite the high prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), few studies have identified clinical correlates using national data. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical associations of CAD in a national random sample of new ESRD in the United States in 1996/1997 (n = 4025). Data on demographic characteristics and comorbidities were obtained from the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study, Wave 2. The principal outcome was CAD, defined as the presence of a previous history of CAD, myocardial infarction, or angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary angioplasty, or abnormal coronary angiographic findings. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of conventional factors and proposed uremic factors to the presence of CAD. CAD was present in 38% of patients. Of the total cohort, 17% had a history of myocardial infarction and 23% had angina. Several conventional risk factors, including advancing age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, were significantly associated with CAD. Of the proposed uremic factors, lower serum albumin levels but higher residual renal function and higher hematocrit values were significantly associated with the presence of CAD. Vascular comorbid conditions, structural cardiac abnormalities, white race, and geographic location were also strongly correlated with the presence of CAD. This national study suggests that several conventional CAD risk factors may also be risk factors for CAD among the ESRD population. This study identifies nonconventional factors such as serum albumin levels, vascular comorbid conditions, and structural cardiac abnormalities as important disease correlates. Future logitudinal studies are required to explore the relative importance of the relationships observed here.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-507
Author(s):  
Xingxing S. Cheng ◽  
Roy O. Mathew ◽  
Ravi Parasuraman ◽  
Ekamol Tantisattamo ◽  
Swee-Ling Levea ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Gianetti ◽  
Gianfranco Gensini ◽  
Raffaele De Caterina

SummaryAims. The recent publication of two large trials of secondary prevention of coronary artery disease with oral anticoagulants (WARIS and ASPECT) has caused a revival of the interest for this antithrombotic therapy in a clinical setting where the use of aspirin is common medical practice. Despite this, the preferential use of aspirin has been supported by an American cost-effectiveness analysis (JAMA 1995; 273: 965). Methods and Results. Using the same parameters used in that analysis and incidence of events from the Antiplatelet Trialists Collaboration and the ASPECT study, we re-evaluated the economic odds in favor of aspirin or oral anticoagulants in the Italian Health System, which differs significantly in cost allocation from the United States system and is, conversely, similar to other European settings. Recalculated costs associated with each therapy were 2,150 ECU/ patient/year for oral anticoagulants and 2,187 ECU/patient/year for aspirin. In our analysis, the higher costs of oral anticoagulants versus aspirin due to a moderate excess of bleeding (about 10 ECU/ patient/year) and the monitoring of therapy (168 ECU/ patient/year) are more than offset by an alleged savings for recurrent ischemic syndromes and interventional procedures (249 ECU/ patient/year). Conclusions. Preference of aspirin vs. oral anticoagulants in a pharmaco-economical perspective is highly dependent on the geographical situation whereupon calculations are based. On a pure cost-effectiveness basis, and in the absence of data of direct comparisons between aspirin alone versus I.N.R.-adjusted oral anticoagulants, the latter are not more expensive than aspirin in Italy and, by cost comparisons, in other European countries in the setting of post-myocardial infarction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Cullaro ◽  
Pratima Sharma ◽  
Jennifer Jo ◽  
Jasmine Rassiwala ◽  
Lisa VanWagner ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-334
Author(s):  
ARTHUR LAVIN ◽  
ALAN H. NAUSS

Atherosclerosis is the leading cause of death in the United States. Studies in adults have shown that intervention with combined diet and medication can reduce atherosclerotic plaque formation and, as a result, the incidence of symptomatic coronary artery disease.1-4 With a strong tradition of preventive medicine, the pediatric community has begun exploring the prevention of adult atherosclerosis through intervention in childhood. Although issues such as universal vs selective high-risk screening, ideal age for screening and intervention, and treatment regimens remain unresolved and controversial, many preventive cardiology clinics, as well as individual pediatricians, have been screening and treating children.5,6 As part of an initial evaluation of hypercholesterolemic children and prior to any intervention, it is important to determine whether other disease processes are contributing to the child's dyslipoproteinemia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document