scholarly journals Fit for Educational Purpose? The Findings of a Mixed Methods Study of Nurses’ Decisions to Participate in Professional Development and Recognition Programmes

2020 ◽  
pp. 50-59
Author(s):  
Samantha Heath ◽  
Sally Clendon ◽  
Roberta Hunter
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Educational Purpose

scholarly journals Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a mixed methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Snowdon ◽  
Michelle Sargent ◽  
Cylie M. Williams ◽  
Stephen Maloney ◽  
Kirsten Caspers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Clinical Supervision ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Supervisory Relationship ◽  
Allied Health Professionals

Abstract Background Clinical supervision is recommended for allied health professionals for the purpose of supporting them in their professional role, continued professional development and ensuring patient safety and high quality care. The aim of this mixed methods study was to explore allied health professionals’ perceptions about the aspects of clinical supervision that can facilitate effective clinical supervision. Methods Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted on a purposive sample of 38 allied health professionals working in a metropolitan public hospital. Qualitative analysis was completed using an interpretive description approach. To enable triangulation of qualitative data, a quantitative descriptive survey of clinical supervision effectiveness was also conducted using the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale (MCSS-26). Results Three main themes emerged from qualitative analysis: Allied health professionals reported that clinical supervision was most effective when their professional development was the focus of clinical supervision; the supervisor possessed the skills and attributes required to facilitate a constructive supervisory relationship; and the organisation provided an environment that facilitated this relationship together with their own professional development. Three subthemes also emerged within each of the main themes: the importance of the supervisory relationship; prioritisation of clinical supervision relative to other professional duties; and flexibility of supervision models, processes and approaches to clinical supervision. The mean MCSS-26 score was 79.2 (95%CI 73.7 to 84.3) with scores ranging from 44 to 100. MCSS-26 results converged with the qualitative findings with participants reporting an overall positive experience with clinical supervision. Conclusions The factors identified by allied health professionals that influenced the effectiveness of their clinical supervision were mostly consistent among the professions. However, allied health professionals reported using models of clinical supervision that best suited their profession’s role and learning style. This highlighted the need for flexible approaches to allied health clinical supervision that should be reflected in clinical supervision policies and guidelines. Many of the identified factors that influence the effectiveness of clinical supervision of allied health professionals can be influenced by health organisations.

Faculty Motivation for Pursuit of Entrepreneurial Mindset Professional Development

2021 ◽  
pp. 251512742098851
Author(s):  
Alexandra Jackson ◽  
Cara Mawson ◽  
Cheryl A. Bodnar
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Course Development ◽  
Faculty Motivation ◽  
Engineering Faculty ◽  
Future Workshop ◽  
Personal Interests

Entrepreneurial mindset (EM) has recently been adapted and integrated into various engineering classes and programs globally. Studies have shown that this integration can be effective and lead to beneficial student outcomes. To ensure broader integration of EM, faculty need to be trained on this construct and how it can be implemented within class-based environments. This study examines faculty motivation to attend professional development opportunities focused on EM offered by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN). Through this mixed methods study it was found that faculty are often motivated by the value the workshop holds for them personally and for their career, and its usefulness in their courses. They are also motivated by their personal interests and enjoyment of professional development opportunities. The faculty in our study indicated being enabled by the workshop content's relevance to their teaching, especially in terms of course development, and its effectiveness in helping them become better instructors. Depending on the circumstances, faculty were either enabled or dissuaded by the timing of the workshop and the available funding for them to attend. The results of this study can help future workshop designers tailor their workshops to meet the needs of engineering faculty both nationwide and globally.

scholarly journals Does being a coach benefit clinician-educators? A mixed methods study of faculty self-efficacy, job satisfaction and burnout

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha J. Elster ◽  
Patricia S. O’Sullivan ◽  
Virginie Muller-Juge ◽  
Leslie Sheu ◽  
Sunitha V. Kaiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Clinician Educators

Abstract Introduction Coaching is a growing clinician-educator role. Self-efficacy is a powerful faculty motivator that is associated positively with job satisfaction and negatively with burnout. This study examines self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and burnout in coaches and other clinician-educators. Methods We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey followed by qualitative interviews of faculty at the University of California, San Francisco. Coaches (funded 20% full-time equivalents), faculty with other funded education positions (“funded”), and faculty without funded education positions (“unfunded”) completed a 48-item survey addressing self-efficacy (teaching, professional development, and scholarship), job satisfaction, and burnout. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by post-hoc tests and chi-square tests. To elaborate quantitative results, we conducted qualitative interviews of 15 faculty and analyzed data using framework analysis. Results 202 of 384 faculty (52.6%) responded to the survey; 187 complete surveys were analyzed. Teaching self-efficacy was similar across groups. Coaches and funded educators had significantly higher professional development self-efficacy and job satisfaction than unfunded educators. Burnout was more prevalent in coaches and unfunded educators. Qualitative analysis yielded three themes: sources of reward, academic identity, and strategies to mitigate burnout. Educator roles provide reward that enhances self-efficacy and job satisfaction but also generate competing demands. Coaches cited challenges in forming professional identities and working with struggling learners. Discussion The coaching role provides faculty with benefits similar to other funded educator roles, but the particular demands of the coach role may contribute to burnout.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document