Faculty Opinions recommendation of First-line therapy with fludarabine compared with chlorambucil does not result in a major benefit for elderly patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Author(s):  
Ulrich Wedding
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (16) ◽  
pp. 3382-3391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara F. Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽  
Martina Stauch ◽  
Manuela A. Bergmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of elderly patients, subjects older than 65 years are heavily underrepresented in clinical trials. The German CLL study group (GCLLSG) initiated a multicenter phase III trial for CLL patients older than 65 years comparing first-line therapy with fludarabine with chlorambucil. A total of 193 patients with a median age of 70 years were randomized to receive fludarabine (25 mg/m2 for 5 days intravenously, every 28 days, for 6 courses) or chlorambucil (0.4 mg/kg body weight [BW] with an increase to 0.8 mg/kg, every 15 days, for 12 months). Fludarabine resulted in a significantly higher overall and complete remission rate (72% vs 51%, P = .003; 7% vs 0%, P = .011). Time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the chlorambucil arm (11 vs 18 months; P = .004), but no difference in progression-free survival time was observed (19 months with fludarabine, 18 months with chlorambucil; P = .7). Moreover, fludarabine did not increase the overall survival time (46 months in the fludarabine vs 64 months in the chlorambucil arm; P = .15). Taken together, the results suggest that in elderly CLL patients the first-line therapy with fludarabine alone does not result in a major clinical benefit compared with chlorambucil. This trial is registered with www.isrctn.org under identifier ISRCTN 36294212.


Haematologica ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Moreno ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Fatih Demirkan ◽  
Alessandra Tedeschi ◽  
Bertrand Anz ◽  
...  

iLLUMINATE is a randomized, open-label phase 3 study of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (n=113) versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (n=116) as first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥65 years, or


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4970-4970
Author(s):  
J.E. Novoa ◽  
A.L. Rojo ◽  
B. Beñaran ◽  
R. Draper ◽  
H. Calvo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: fludarabine (F) has become the standard first line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in younger patients. Treatment of early stage patients with chlorambucil without risk stratification has not been shown to prolong survival. In recent years effective and potentially curative approaches such as nucleosides analogues, stem cell transplantation or monoclonal antibodies have been developed. The attraction of monoclonal antibodies is based on selective targeting of tumor - relevant surface markers and a distinct mechanism of action (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity). Aims: to assess the efficacy, safety and quality of life of F in previously untreated B-cell CLL patients in a group of medical institutions in Uruguay during 11 years (1995–2006). Methods: 168 patients between the period 1995 – 2006 were evaluated.120 of them received F intravenous formulation (1995–2006) and 48 the oral one (2002–2006). Age: 48 – 85 years old, media 67 years old. Gender: male 90, female 78. Inclusion criteria for B-cell CLL was Binet stages B, C and A progressive (Ap), 18 to 85 years old, non multiorganic failure, performance status 0 – 2 (WHO), written informed consent. First condition was non previous treatment. Staging: Binet A 12/168, B 116/168 & C 40/168. Treatment: as first line therapy all the patients received (minimum): 6 cycles of i.v. Fludarabine (Fludara®, Schering) 25 mg/m2/daily (5 days) e/30 days or Oral Fludarabine, 40 mg/m2/daily (5 days), 6 cycles. Results: on this B-cell CLL cohort the overall response rate (ORR) was 78% (CR+PR), 80% of them have immunophenotypic response. Safety: on the 1100 cycles in 168 patients, the toxicity was: 1 AIHA, 2 pancytopenia, 3 plaquetopenia. Grade 3–4 infection rate was 1,3%. No alopecia was observed in any patient. Kaposi sarcoma (0,7%). Mortality rate: 1,7% (3/168 patients). Other adverse factors to overall survival were, age over 65 (p=0,0001) and hepatic impairment (p=0,0001). Toxicity: (WHO>2): granulocytopenia 28%, thrombocytopenia 8%, infection 2%. Although fludarabine-treated patients experienced more significant myelosuppression, no difference in the treatment group was demonstrated. Causes of death: Richter 12%, sepsis 5%, associated disease 34%, second malignancy 17% and others 30%. Comparing oral with intravenous formulation in overall survival the results were: CLL 34% vs 36% (p= NS). Conclusions: fludarabine monofosfate (Fludara®) looks like an effective and safe treatment for B-cell CLL. The oral and intravenous formulations have a similar response rate in elderly and young patients. The challenge remains to integrate new information to apply novel therapies in a disease-specific and risk-adapted maner. A longer follow up and a larger trial, might be needed to confirm these results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1269-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Cuneo ◽  
Monia Marchetti ◽  
Giovanni Barosi ◽  
Atto Billio ◽  
Maura Brugiatelli ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (21) ◽  
pp. 1796-1801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Woyach

This article provides a comprehensive review of the first-line therapy in the rapidly evolving field of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 337-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Jerzy Z. Blonski ◽  
Joanna Gora-Tybor ◽  
Marek Kasznicki ◽  
Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of cladribine alone (2-CdA) and in combination with cyclophosphamide - CY (CC) or CY and mitoxantrone - MIT (CMC) in previously untreated patients with progressive or symptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a randomized, multicenter study. 2-CdA was given at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg/d in 2 h I.V. infusion for 5 consecutive days in monotherapy and for 3 days in combination. In CC and CMC programmes cyclophosphamide was administered at a dose of 650 mg/m2 I.V. on day 1 and additionally mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 I.V. on day 1 in CMC. Courses were repeated at 28 day intervals or longer if myelosuppression and/or infection developed, for a maximum of 6 courses. The response criteria were those recommended by NCI sponsored Working Group. Minimal residual disease (MRD) were evaluated by flow cytometry if CR was achieved. In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that 2-CdA combined with CY or CY+MIT as first line therapy give higher CR rate than 2-CdA alone. However, CMC is more toxic than 2-CdA or CC. We recommend CC combination for further studies. Treatment 2-CdA CC CMC p value Entered pts 167 169 163 Evaluated pts 143 152 139 CR 37 (25.9%) 43 (28.3%) 55 (39.6%) 0.03 OR 106 (74.1%) 125 (82.2%) 110 (79.1%) 0.2 MRD 15 (46.9%) 22 (82.2%) 25 (56.8%) 0.7 Median OR duration (years) 1.67 1.81 1.43 0.1 Relapse 48 (45.3%) 45 (29.6%) 43 (30.9%) 0.2 AIHA 10 (7.0%) 10 (6.6%) 5 (3.6%) 0.4 Thrombocytopenia grIII/IV 25 (17.5%) 25 (16.4%) 32 (23.0%) 0.3 Neutropenia grIII/IV 27 (18.9%) 43 (28.3%) 52 (37.4%) <0.001 Infections 39 (27.3%) 47 (30.9%) 53 (38.1%) 0.07 Died 39 (27.3%) 30 (19.7%) 37 (26.6%) 0.4


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4606-4606
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Knauf ◽  
Wolfgang Abenhardt ◽  
Ali Aldaoud ◽  
Christian Lerchenmüller ◽  
Michaela Koska ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4606 Introduction: The treatment of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) has changed significantly over the last years. To select an appropriate treatment, multiple factors have to be considered. In particular, the stage of disease, patient’s age, comorbidities and personal preferences, respectively, influence decision making. The clinical tumor registry on lymphoid neoplasms (TLN Registry) conducted by the iOMEDICO AG in collaboration with the Arbeitskreis Klinische Studien (AKS) and the Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome (KML) was established to collect data on the daily practice treatment of 3000 non-selected patients with lymphoid neoplasms. Here, we present data regarding treatment and sequences of regimes in patients (pts) with CLL treated by office-based hematologists in Germany. Methods: While targeting 500 CLL pts, the registry prospectively collects data on pts characteristics, tumor history, treatment, response rates and sequences of regimes. In addition data on adverse drug reactions and concomitant diseases are documented. CLL pts older than 18 years receiving a first- or second line therapy which has started no longer than 4 weeks before patient enrolment can be recruited into the registry if informed written consent is present. All pts are followed for 5 years. Currently, 116 sites across Germany are participating. Results: The TLN Registry started in May 2009. Currently, 492 pts with CLL have been recruited. The mean age at the start of first line therapy is 69 years. The majority of pts (63%) are male. About 20% of the pts in first line therapy are treated within clinical trials. Median time between diagnosis and start of first line therapy is 22 months (range 0 – 285 months). Most of the pts receive Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR, 34%) or Fludarabin/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR, 21%) in first line therapy. Overall, 97% of the first line therapies were successful (91% CR/PR, 6% SD). In particular, 99% of BR (98% CR/PR, 1% SD) and 100% of FCR (98% CR/PR, 2% SD) therapies were successful. Over time, a change in treatment selection becomes apparent. 50% of the pts started first line therapy before October 2009. They mainly received BR (19%), Bendamustine (16%), FCR (16%) or Chlorambucil (15%), respectively. Pts starting first line therapy after October 2009 mainly received BR (43%) or FCR (24%). Bendamustine-containing regimens are more often used as first line therapy in pts older than 75 years as compared to younger ones (62% vs. 42%). Fludarabine-containing regimens are more often used in pts younger than 75 years (37% vs. 6%). Similar to the first line therapy, BR is the most often used second line therapy (52%). About 41% of the pts have completed first line therapy and have not yet started second line therapy. The median treatment-free interval since the end of the first line therapy is 10 months. Data on second line therapy are available in 24% of the pts. The majority of these pts (73%) were recruited at the start of second line therapy. Most of them receive BR as second line therapy after first line therapy either with Chlorambucil (17%) or Bendamustine (13%). The median treatment-free interval between the end of first line therapy and the start of second line therapy is 16 months (range 1 – 49 months). Conclusion: The registry provides an overview on particularities and changes in routine treatment of pts with CLL treated by office-based hematologists in Germany. Implementation of new standards affecting treatment preferences are currently under evaluation. BR and FCR are widely accepted and very effective as first line therapies. Our data indicate that age is an important factor for selecting the appropriate treatment. Further analyses will investigate additional variables influencing the choice of treatment. With more data becoming available the sequences of regimes and their effectiveness can be analyzed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document