Faculty Opinions recommendation of Self-renewal does not predict tumor growth potential in mouse models of high-grade glioma.

Author(s):  
Arthur Mercurio
Cancer Cell ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindy E. Barrett ◽  
Zvi Granot ◽  
Courtney Coker ◽  
Antonio Iavarone ◽  
Dolores Hambardzumyan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 714-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke A. de Vries ◽  
Jos H. Beijnen ◽  
Olaf van Tellingen

2012 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. S26
Author(s):  
V. Le Joncour ◽  
C. Lecointre ◽  
M. Jarry ◽  
J.E. Joubert ◽  
M.T. Schouft ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Brüningk ◽  
Jeffrey Peacock ◽  
Christopher J. Whelan ◽  
Renee Brady-Nicholls ◽  
Hsiang-Hsuan M. Yu ◽  
...  

AbstractRecurrent high grade glioma patients face a poor prognosis for which no curative treatment option currently exists. In contrast to prescribing high dose hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT, $$\ge 6$$ ≥ 6 Gy $$\times$$ × 5 in daily fractions) with debulking intent, we suggest a personalized treatment strategy to improve tumor control by delivering high dose intermittent radiation treatment (iRT, $$\ge 6$$ ≥ 6 Gy $$\times$$ × 1 every 6 weeks). We performed a simulation analysis to compare HFSRT, iRT and iRT plus boost ($$\ge 6$$ ≥ 6 Gy $$\times$$ × 3 in daily fractions at time of progression) based on a mathematical model of tumor growth, radiation response and patient-specific evolution of resistance to additional treatments (pembrolizumab and bevacizumab). Model parameters were fitted from tumor growth curves of 16 patients enrolled in the phase 1 NCT02313272 trial that combined HFSRT with bevacizumab and pembrolizumab. Then, iRT +/− boost treatments were simulated and compared to HFSRT based on time to tumor regrowth. The modeling results demonstrated that iRT + boost(− boost) treatment was equal or superior to HFSRT in 15(11) out of 16 cases and that patients that remained responsive to pembrolizumab and bevacizumab would benefit most from iRT. Time to progression could be prolonged through the application of additional, intermittently delivered fractions. iRT hence provides a promising treatment option for recurrent high grade glioma patients for prospective clinical evaluation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1286-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Lin ◽  
Mark C. de Gooijer ◽  
Diana Hanekamp ◽  
Gayathri Chandrasekaran ◽  
Levi C.M. Buil ◽  
...  

Theranostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 6361-6371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Brighi ◽  
Lee Reid ◽  
Laura A Genovesi ◽  
Marija Kojic ◽  
Amanda Millar ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (13) ◽  
pp. 3431-3441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke A. de Vries ◽  
Sophia W. Bruggeman ◽  
Danielle Hulsman ◽  
Hilda I. de Vries ◽  
John Zevenhoven ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i22-i22
Author(s):  
John DeSisto ◽  
Aaron Knox ◽  
Hannah Chatwin ◽  
Ilango Balakrishnan ◽  
Sujatha Venkataraman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG) are aggressive tumors that together constitute the most common cause of childhood cancer mortality. Tumor stem cells that drive proliferation of pHGG resist chemotherapy and radiation, complicating treatment. The arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 maintains self-renewal in neural stem cells through epigenetic modifications. We hypothesized that PRMT5, which we identified as a potential driver of diffuse midline glioma (DMG) through an shRNA screen, plays a similar role in pHGG. Methods Using lentiviral delivery of shRNA, we knocked down (KD) PRMT5 in cortical pHGG and DMG cell lines and performed phenotypic, mechanistic and self-renewal assays. We irradiated PRMT5 KD and control cells to study sensitization. We orthotopically injected mice with PRMT5 KD pHGG cells, and with DMG cells in which PRMT5 was knocked out (KO) using CRISPR-Cas. Results In cellular models of cortical pHGG and DMG, PRMT5 KD significantly reduced proliferation, inhibited cell cycle progression, increased apoptosis resistance, and decreased self-renewing cell frequency. A relative shift of PRMT5 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus accompanied differentiation induced by PRMT5 KD. Epigenetic changes accompanying PRMT5 KD included increased H3K27me3, a global transcription inhibitor, and decreased H3K27M expression in DMG. PRMT5 KD sensitized pHGG cells to radiation, increasing cell death 17–30%. PRMT5 KD/KO significantly increased survival in mice and decreased tumor aggressiveness and proliferation, but mice still died of tumor-related effects. Conclusions PRMT5 maintains self-renewal and drives proliferation in preclinical pHGG models. In cellular and in vivo models, PRMT5 KD/KO produces epigenetic changes, including increased H3K27me3 levels and diminished H3K27M, that may reduce proliferation and self-renewal. Future work includes elucidation of the mechanisms by which PRMT5 produces the observed changes. Because PRMT5 KD/KO does not eliminate tumor growth, we plan to further study combining PRMT5 KD/KO and clinical-grade small molecule PRMT5 inhibitors with radiation and chemotherapeutic agents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document