Background:
ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) follow-up within several weeks of hospital discharge. Recommendations regarding intensity of following-up in the year following AMI are not provided. The relationship between frequency of follow-up and use of evidence-based therapies following AMI is unknown.
Methods:
6,838 patients from 2 multicenter prospective AMI registries, PREMIER and TRIUMPH registries were studied. We divided the number of patient self-reported outpatient follow-up visits with cardiologists, primary care providers, or both into tertiles: low, medium, and high. The primary outcome was use of statins, beta blockers, aspirin, ACE/ARBs, and a composite of all four medications at 12 months among eligible patients. The association between tertiles of visits following AMI among patients who had at least one visit and primary outcome was evaluated using hierarchical multivariable modified Poisson models.
Results:
Mean number of follow-up visits in the year following AMI was 6 (IQR 3 - 8) and 189 (4%) of patients had no visits. In lowest tertile, patients had 1 to < 4 visits, in the medium tertile, 4 to < 7 visits, and in highest tertile, 7 to 59 visits. Patients in medium and high intensity tertiles were older, more likely to have insurance, and had higher GRACE 6-month mortality risk scores compared to the lowest tertile. In multivariable analyses, patients in the medium tertile were more likely to use statins and ASA than those in the lowest tertile (Figure). There were no differences in use of individual medications when comparing the highest and medium tertiles although individuals in the highest tertile were less likely to use all four medications.
Conclusions:
Significant variability exists in follow-up frequency following AMI and 4% of the cohort had no follow-up. Patients who had medium intensity visits were more likely to use some evidence-based medications than those with low intensity. Higher intensity visits was not associated with greater medication use. It is possible that the observed differences may be attributed to unmeasured differences among patients rather than the actual follow-up visits. Prospective studies are needed to assess key elements of outpatient visits that may lead to better utilization of evidence-based therapies.
Twenty Year Trends and Sex Differences in Young Adults Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction
