Sex Differences in Management and Mortality of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction National Registry)

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 751
Author(s):  
Nir Harish
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
National Registry ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation

A kórházi felvétel idején rögzített EKG jelentősége a szívinfarktus miatt kezelt betegek prognózisának meghatározásában

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (17) ◽  
pp. 677-681
Author(s):  
András Jánosi ◽  
Péter Ofner ◽  
János Tomcsányi ◽  
Gábor Müller ◽  
Richárd Hável ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
National Registry ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract: Introduction and aim: By using the database of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, the authors examine the prognosis of patients treated with acute myocardial infarction, in case of whom there was new or presumably new left bundle branch block (nLBBB) on the ECG recorded at hospitalization. Method: We recorded the details of 18 091 patients treated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2015 in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. In case of 8334 patients, the clinical diagnosis was ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), whereas in 9757 cases it was non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). In the STEMI population we examined the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with ST-elevation (n = 7937) and nLBBB (n = 397). We used the proportional hazards regression model (Cox-regression) to examine mortality. Results: In the AMI patient population, we found LBBB in 1274 cases (7%). In case of STEMI clinical diagnosis, the patients belonging to the nLBBB subpopulation (n = 397) were older, and the proportion of men and the occurrence of co-morbidities was higher than in case of those who had ST-elevation on their ECG recorded at hospitalization. The mortality rate of the LBBB population was higher than that of the ST-elevation patient population in both the 30-day (25.4% versus 12.4%) and the 1-year period (47.3 versus 19.9%). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) had significantly lower mortality in both populations. In the course of a multifactorial analysis we verified the independent prognostic significance of LBBB: the hazard ratio compared to ST-elevation was 1.33 (95% confidence interval: 1.10–1.62), checked for gender, age, occurrence of PCI, systolic blood pressure, cardiac frequency, serum creatinine difference, and the details of five anamneses/co-morbidities. Conclusion: The admission ECG has prognostic significance. Patients with LBBB have poorer prognosis compared to patients with ST-elevation on admission ECG. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(17): 677–681.

The effect of preloading statins prior to primary reperfusion on in-hospital mortality risk in a contemporary large-scale cohort of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Fu ◽  
C.X Song ◽  
X.D Li ◽  
Y.J Yang
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background The benefit of statins in secondary prevention of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been well established. However, the benefit of preloading statins, i.e. high-intensity statins prior to reperfusion therapy remains unclear. Most previous studies included all types of ACS patients, and subgroup analysis indicated the benefit of preloading statins was only seen in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the sample size of subgroup population was relatively small and such benefit requires further validation. Objective To investigate the effect of loading dose of statins before primary reperfusion on 30-mortality in patients with STEMI. Methods We enrolled patients in China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry from January 2013 to September 2014. CAMI registry was a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute acute myocardial infarction in China. Patients were divided into two groups according to statins usage: preloading group and control group. Patients in preloading group received loading does of statins before primary reperfusion and during hospitalization. Patients in control group did not receive statins during hospitalization or at discharge. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Baseline characteristics, angiographic characteristics and outcome were compared between groups. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to mitigate baseline differences between groups and examine the association between preloading statins on in-hospital mortality risk. The following variables were used to establish PS matching score: age, sex, classification of hospitals, clinical presentation (heart failure at presentation, cardiac shock, cardiac arrest, Killip classification), hypertension, diabetes, prior angina, prior myocardial infarction history, prior stroke, initial treatment. Results A total of 1169 patients were enrolled in control group and 6795 in preloading group. A total of 833 patients (334 in control group and 499 in preloading group) died during hospitalization. Compared with control group, preloading group were younger, more likely to be male and present with Killip I classification. The proportion of hypertension and diabetes were higher in preloading group. After PS matching, all the variables used to generate PS score were well balanced. In the PS-matched cohort, 30-day mortality risk was 26.3% (292/1112) in the control group and 11.9% (132/1112) in the preloading group (p<0.0001). Conclusions The current study found preloading statins treatment prior to reperfusion therapy reduced in-hospital mortality risk in a large-scale contemporary cohort of patients with STEMI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

scholarly journals Are there sex differences in the effect of type 2 diabetes in the incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction? A matched-pair analysis using hospital discharge data

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Lopez-de-Andres ◽  
Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia ◽  
Valentin Hernández-Barrera ◽  
Jose M. de Miguel-Yanes ◽  
Romana Albaladejo-Vicente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background To analyze incidence, use of therapeutic procedures, and in-hospital outcomes in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) according to the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Spain (2016–2018) and to investigate sex differences. Methods Using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database, we estimated the incidence of myocardial infarctions (MI) in men and women with and without T2DM aged ≥ 40 years. We analyzed comorbidity, procedures, and outcomes. We matched each man and woman with T2DM with a non-T2DM man and woman of identical age, MI code, and year of hospitalization. Propensity score matching was used to compare men and women with T2DM. Results MI was coded in 109,759 men and 44,589 women (30.47% with T2DM). The adjusted incidence of STEMI (IRR 2.32; 95% CI 2.28–2.36) and NSTEMI (IRR 2.91; 95% CI 2.88–2.94) was higher in T2DM than non-T2DM patients, with higher IRRs for NSTEMI in both sexes. The incidence of STEMI and NSTEMI was higher in men with T2DM than in women with T2DM. After matching, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was less frequent among T2DM men than non-T2DM men who had STEMI and NSTEMI. Women with T2DM and STEMI less frequently had a code for PCI that matched that of non-T2DM women. In-hospital mortality (IHM) was higher among T2DM women with STEMI and NSTEMI than in matched non-T2DM women. In men, IHM was higher only for NSTEMI. Propensity score matching showed higher use of PCI and coronary artery bypass graft and lower IHM among men with T2DM than women with T2DM for both STEMI and NSTEMI. Conclusions T2DM is associated with a higher incidence of STEMI and NSTEMI in both sexes. Men with T2DM had higher incidence rates of STEMI and NSTEMI than women with T2DM. Having T2DM increased the risk of IHM after STEMI and NSTEMI among women and among men only for NSTEMI. PCI appears to be less frequently used in T2DM patients After STEMI and NSTEMI, women with T2DM less frequently undergo revascularization procedures and have a higher mortality risk than T2DM men.

scholarly journals DIFFERENTIAL CELL COUNT AS DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC MARKER OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Sri Anita ◽  
Liong Boy Kurniawan ◽  
Darwati Muhadi
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cell Count ◽  
Inflammatory Marker ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Differential Cell Count ◽  
Differential Cell ◽  
St Elevation

Myocardial infarction is a necrosis of myocardial cells due to lack of blood and oxygen supply caused by obstruction of coronary arteries, mostly due to atherosclerosis processes. Increased inflammatory marker level is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. This study was aimed to know whether leukocytes count, differential cell count and the Ratio of Neutrophils-Lymphocytes (RNL) could distinguish between types of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and to evaluate its correlation with mortality. This was a cross-sectional retrospective study using medical records patients which were diagnosed as AMI by clinicians in Cardiac Centre of the Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital during the period of April 1st, 2015 - May 31st, 2016. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney and Chi-Square test, p<0.05 was considered as significant. The total subjects were 435 patients divided into 289 ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and 146 Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI). There were significant differences in that mean of leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils counts and RNL between STEMI and NSTEMI (p <0.05). Significant differences were also found in leukocyte, neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, basophils and RNL mean between those who died and survived (p <0.05) and a significant correlation between increased leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils counts with mortality (p <0.05). In conclusion, the number of leukocytes and leukocyte count can be used as diagnostic markers of AMI between STEMI and NSTEMI, as well as prognostic markers among patients who died and survived. Routine blood sampling cohort studies in patients with AMI can avoid the bias of the results obtained. 

Delays in Presentation by Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suhaib Almashari ◽  
Yasir Al-Malki ◽  
Adil Al-Riyami ◽  
Sunil K Nadar
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Public Education ◽  
Primary Angioplasty ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Sultan Qaboos University ◽  
Early Evaluation ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Patient Factor

Objectives: To assess causes of delay for presentation with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at our institution. Methods: We included patients with a STEMI that were taken up for primary angioplasty, who had presented from Jan 2017 to December 2019 to the emergency department at Sultan Qaboos university hospital, Muscat. Results: 101 patients (Mean age 54.8+10.8 years; 80 (79.2%) male) were included. The median (IQR) pain to door time was 60 (30-120) minutes.  66 (66%) patients arrived within 90 minutes. All except one arrived by privately arranged transport. Feeling that the pain was not important (60%) or not cardiac (22%) were the main reasons for delay. Being diabetic was the only patient factor that predicted delay. Conclusion: A high proportion of patients presenting to our institution with a STEMI arrived within recommended times. However more public education is required to improve awareness about the importance of early evaluation of chest pain. Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; prehospital delay

scholarly journals Postpartum Coronary Vasospasm with Literature Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayanth Koneru ◽  
Matthew Cholankeril ◽  
Kunal Patel ◽  
Fadi Alattar ◽  
Ashraf Alqaqa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Postpartum Period ◽  
Coronary Vasospasm ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Postpartum Woman ◽  
First Case ◽  
St Elevation

Acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy or the postpartum period is rare. We report a case of a 39-year-old postpartum woman who developed non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to severe diffuse coronary vasospasm. To our knowledge, this is the first case of angiographically evidenced coronary vasospasm, in a postpartum woman, with resistance to intracoronary nitroglycerin.

Participation in a research study related to acute myocardial infarction is not a guarantee to live more longer: results from the FAST-MI registries

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Puymirat ◽  
F Schiele ◽  
F Roubille ◽  
V Tea ◽  
J Ferrieres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Research Study ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background The main potential benefits of participating in a clinical trial is to have access to a treatment that is not available yet and to have a regular and careful attention from physicians. Several data have suggested that inclusion in a research study was associated with better clinical outcome. Aims The aim of this study is to describe the prevalence of inclusions in a research study (i.e., device or medication), clinical characteristics, management and clinical outcome in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) according to participation in a research study (versus not) using data from the French registries of Acute ST-or non-ST-elevation Myocardial infarction (FAST-MI) 2010 and 2015. Methods We used data from 2 one-month French registries, conducted 5 years apart, including 9,414 AMI admitted to coronary or intensive care units. We analyzed baseline characteristics, management and one-year survival according to participation in a research study. Results From 2010 to 2015, the prevalence of patients included in a research study decreased from 6.8% to 3.6% (P&lt;0.001). Inclusions were performed mainly in university hospitals (8%). Clinical characteristics according to participation in a research study were strongly different. Overall, patients included in a research study were younger (61.2±12.7 vs 65.7±14.1; P&lt;0.001) with less previous medical history and co-morbidities. Clinical presentation was preferentially a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI: 70% vs 52%; P&lt;0.001) in these patients who had a lower GRACE score (133±32 vs. 141±35; P&lt;0.001). The use of invasive strategies was more used in patients included in a research study (coronary angiogram: 99% vs 95%, P&lt;0.001) as prescriptions of recommended medications (i.e., antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and statins) at discharge (72% vs 63%; P&lt;0.001). In a cox multivariate analysis, participation in a research study was not associated with lower mortality at one-year (HR= 0.68, 95% CI, 0.39–1.18, P=0.17). Similar results were observed in patients discharge alive (HR= 0.81, 95% CI, 0.44–1.48, P=0.49). Recommended medications were however more used in patients included in a clinical trial (OR=1.34; 95% CI, 1.09–1.65; P=0.007). Conclusions The number of inclusions in a research study related to AMI in France is low. Our data suggest that patients included in a research study are selected and received more recommended medications and invasive strategies. However, this management is not associated with a lower mortality at one-year. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document