scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Nitsche
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
The Brain

scholarly journals Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Alekseichuk ◽  
Arnaud Y. Falchier ◽  
Gary Linn ◽  
Ting Xu ◽  
Michael P. Milham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
The Brain

scholarly journals Electric Field Dynamics in the Brain During Multi-Electrode Transcranial Electric Stimulation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Alekseichuk ◽  
Arnaud Y. Falchier ◽  
Gary Linn ◽  
Ting Xu ◽  
Michael P. Milham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Neural Oscillations ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Multiple Electrodes ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
Mechanistic Understanding ◽  
Linear Manner ◽  
The Brain

ABSTRACTNeural oscillations play a crucial role in communication between remote brain areas. Transcranial electric stimulation with alternating currents (TACS) can manipulate these brain oscillations in a non-invasive manner. Of particular interest, TACS protocols using multiple electrodes with phase shifted stimulation currents were developed to alter the connectivity between two or more brain regions. Typically, an increase in coordination between two sites is assumed when they experience an in-phase stimulation and a disorganization through an anti-phase stimulation. However, the underlying biophysics of multi-electrode TACS has not been studied in detail, thus limiting our ability to develop a mechanistic understanding. Here, we leverage direct invasive recordings from two non-human primates during multi-electrode TACS to show that the electric field magnitude and phase depend on the phase of the stimulation currents in a non-linear manner. Further, we report a novel phenomenon of a “traveling wave” stimulation where the location of the electric field maximum changes over the stimulation cycle. Our results provide a basis for a mechanistic understanding of multi-electrode TACS, necessitating the reevaluation of previously published studies, and enable future developments of novel stimulation protocols.

scholarly journals Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in human and nonhuman primates

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Opitz ◽  
Arnaud Falchier ◽  
Chao-Gan Yan ◽  
Erin Yeagle ◽  
Gary Linn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Electrode Arrays ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Crucial Information ◽  
Cebus Monkeys ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
The Brain

AbstractTranscranial electric stimulation (TES) is an emerging technique, developed to non-invasively modulate brain function. However, the spatiotemporal distribution of the intracranial electric fields induced by TES remains poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear how much current actually reaches the brain, and how it distributes across the brain. Lack of this basic information precludes a firm mechanistic understanding of TES effects. In this study we directly measure the spatial and temporal characteristics of the electric field generated by TES using stereotactic EEG (s-EEG) electrode arrays implanted in cebus monkeys and surgical epilepsy patients. We found a small frequency dependent decrease (10%) in magnitudes of TES induced potentials and negligible phase shifts over space. Electric field strengths were strongest in superficial brain regions with maximum values of about 0.5 mV/mm. Our results provide crucial information for the interpretation of human TES studies and the optimization and design of TES stimulation protocols. In addition, our findings have broad implications concerning electric field propagation in non-invasive recording techniques such as EEG/MEG.

scholarly journals Transcranial electric stimulation seen from within the brain

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel V Peterchev
Keyword(s):  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Computer Models ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
The Brain

Computer models can make transcranial electric stimulation a better tool for research and therapy.

scholarly journals Effects of electrodes length and insulation for transcranial electric stimulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Tomio
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Lower Threshold ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Stimulation Threshold ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
The Brain

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of length and insulation of the corkscrew electrodes for transcranial motor evoked potential (tMEP) monitoring. Methods: We used the finite element method to visualize the electric field in the brain, which was generated by electrodes of different lengths (4, 7, and 12 mm). Two types of head models were generated: A model that included a subcutaneous fat layer and another without a fat layer. Two insulated needle types of conductive tip (5 and 2 mm) were studied. The stimulation threshold levels of hand tMEP were measured in a clinical setting to compare normal corkscrew and insulated 7-mm depth corkscrew. Results: The electric field in the brain depended on the electrode depths in the no fat layer model. The deeper the electrodes reached, the stronger the electric fields generated. Electrode insulation made a difference in the fat layer models. The threshold level recordings of tMEP revealed that the 7-mm insulated electrodes showed a lower threshold than the normal electrodes by one-side replacement in each patient: 33.6 ± 9.6 mA and 36.3 ± 11.0 mA (n =16, P < 0.001), respectively. The 7-mm insulated electrodes also showed a lower threshold than the normal electrodes when both sides, electrodes were replaced: 34.4 ± 8.6 mA and 37.5 ± 9.2 mA (n =10, P = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: The electrodes depth reached enough to skull is considered to be efficient. Insulation of the electrodes with a conductive tip is efficient when there is subcutaneous fat layer.

scholarly journals Can transcranial electric stimulation with multiple electrodes reach deep targets?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Huang ◽  
Lucas C Parra
Keyword(s):  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Head Model ◽  
Multiple Electrodes ◽  
Realistic Head Model ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Deep Target ◽  
Deep Brain ◽  
Intense Stimulation

To reach a deep target in the brain with transcranial electric stimulation (TES), currents have to pass also through the cortical surface. Thus, it is generally thought that TES cannot achieve focal deep brain stimulation. Recent efforts with interfering waveforms and pulsed stimulation have argued that one can achieve deeper or more intense stimulation in the brain. Here we argue that conventional transcranial stimulation with multiple current sources is just as effective as these new approaches. The conventional multi-electrode approach can be numerically optimized to maximize intensity or focality at a desired target location. Using such optimal electrode configurations we find in a detailed and realistic head model that deep targets may in fact be strongly stimulated, with cerebrospinal fluid guiding currents deep into the brain.

scholarly journals A Computational Modeling Study to Investigate the Use of Epicranial Electrodes to Deliver Interferential Stimulation to Subcortical Regions

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Khatoun ◽  
Boateng Asamoah ◽  
Myles Mc Laughlin
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Computational Modeling ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Cortical Stimulation ◽  
Tetrahedral Mesh ◽  
Subcortical Region ◽  
Subcortical Stimulation ◽  
Transcranial Electric Stimulation ◽  
Subcortical Regions

Background: Epicranial cortical stimulation (ECS) is a minimally invasive neuromodulation technique that works by passing electric current between subcutaneous electrodes positioned on the skull. ECS causes a stronger and more focused electric field in the cortex compared to transcranial electric stimulation (TES) where the electrodes are placed on the scalp. However, it is unknown if ECS can target deeper regions where the electric fields become relatively weak and broad. Recently, interferential stimulation (IF) using scalp electrodes has been proposed as a novel technique to target subcortical regions. During IF, two high, but slightly different, frequencies are applied which sum to generate a low frequency field (i.e., 10 Hz) at a target subcortical region. We hypothesized that IF using ECS electrodes would cause stronger and more focused subcortical stimulation than that using TES electrodes.Objective: Use computational modeling to determine if interferential stimulation-epicranial cortical stimulation (IF-ECS) can target subcortical regions. Then, compare the focality and field strength of IF-ECS to that of interferential Stimulation-transcranial electric stimulation (IF-TES) in the same subcortical region.Methods: A human head computational model was developed with 19 TES and 19 ECS disk electrodes positioned on a 10–20 system. After tetrahedral mesh generation the model was imported to COMSOL where the electric field distribution was calculated for each electrode separately. Then in MATLAB, subcortical targets were defined and the optimal configurations were calculated for both the TES and ECS electrodes.Results: Interferential stimulation using ECS electrodes can deliver stronger and more focused electric fields to subcortical regions than IF using TES electrodes.Conclusion: Interferential stimulation combined with ECS is a promising approach for delivering subcortical stimulation without the need for a craniotomy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document