Background:Understanding key mechanisms of flare development and sustained remission is one of the acute goals in modern rheumatology. Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are the most abundant and specific autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, the impact of ACPA of IgA isotype is poorly defined. IgA ACPA were previously shown to have a higher percentage of IgA2 in comparison to total IgA; and a correlation between IgA2% ACPA with the DAS28 score was observed in a previous study [1]. Of note, IgA1 and IgA2 were shown to exhibit different effector functions, with IgA2 being pro-inflammatory, which might be the background for its role in RA [1].Objectives:We aimed to investigate, whether IgA ACPA could be used as a predictive factor for flare development in RA; and to look further into the changes in IgA ACPA levels in patients remaining in stable remission versus patients developing flare.Methods:We analysed serum of 111 patients from a multicentre randomized controlled trial ‘RETRO’. The study observational period was 12 months. Patients in the trial had to be in stable remission (DAS28-ESR<2.6) for a minimum of 6 months and were randomized into 3 different treatment arms: continuation of treatment, tapering by 50% or a gradual tapering until discontinuation [2]. IgA ACPA concentrations were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on CCP2-pre-coated plates.Results:60% of patients had IgG-ACPA. IgA ACPA levels were higher among the IgG-ACPA-positive patients (median 4.7 versus 2.24 µg/ml, p<0.0001). Baseline IgA1 and 2 ACPA levels were not different between patients who had a flare later on in the study period and those remaining in remission, showing no predictive value for flare development. However, the percentage of IgA2 in ACPA was correlating with the first registered DAS28 after flare (r=0.36, p=0.046). After the 12 months study period, IgA2 ACPA as well as IgA2% ACPA decreased significantly in patients who remained in stable remission by 17.5% (median, p<0.0001) and 13.6% (p=0.0006), respectively. By contrast, there was no significant change in IgA2 ACPA levels over time in patients who developed a flare. IgA1 ACPA levels remained stable over time. Disease management strategies did not seem to influence IgA ACPA levels in a specific way, as baseline levels were similar between patients on biological and conventional DMARDs and changes in levels after 12 months did not depend on the assignment to either of the study arms.Conclusion:Neither IgA1 nor IgA2 ACPA levels were predictive of flare development or associated with treatment strategies (though rituximab, JAK-inhibitors and abatacept were not amongst treatment options). However, in patients remaining in sustained remission after 1 year a decrease in IgA2 and IgA2% ACPA was observed and IgA2% ACPA was associated with DAS28 score registered after flare. This could be an indication towards ACPA of IgA2 isotype contributing to the severity of flare, alongside other factors, and its reduction being associated with a prolonged state of remission.References:[1]Steffen U, Koeleman CA, Sokolova MV, et al. IgA subclasses have different effector functions associated with distinct glycosylation profiles. Nat Commun 11, 120 (2020).[2]Haschka J, Englbrecht M, Hueber AJ, et al. Relapse rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in stable remission tapering or stopping antirheumatic therapy: interim results from the prospective randomised controlled RETRO study. Ann Rheum Dis. 75:45-51 (2016).Disclosure of Interests:None declared
Faculty Opinions recommendation of IgA subclasses have different effector functions associated with distinct glycosylation profiles.
