scholarly journals How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries

Author(s):  
Deon Lingervelder ◽  
Hendrik Koffijberg ◽  
Jon D. Emery ◽  
Paul Fennessy ◽  
Christopher P. Price ◽  
...  

Background: In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point of care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary care, it would be beneficial to have an overview of the structure of healthcare operations and the transactions between stakeholders (also referred to as value networks). The aim of this paper is to identify the current value networks in place applying to POCT implementation at general practices (GPs) in England, Australia, Norway and the Netherlands and to compare these networks in terms of seven previously published factors that support the successful implementation, sustainability and scale-up of innovations. Methods: The value networks were described based on formal guidelines and standards published by the respective governments, organizational bodies and affiliates. The value network of each country was validated by at least two relevant stakeholders from the respective country. Results: The analysis revealed that the biggest challenge for countries with low POCT uptake was the lack of effective communication between the several organizations involved with POCT as well as the high workload for GPs aiming to implement POCT. It is observed that countries with a single national authority responsible for POCT have a better uptake as they can govern the task of POCT roll-out and management and reduce the workload for GPs by assisting with set-up, quality control, training and support. Conclusion: Setting up a single national authority may be an effective step towards realizing the full benefits of POCT. Although it is possible for day-to-day operations to fall under the responsibility of the GP, this is only feasible if support and guidance are readily available to ensure that the workload associated with POCT is limited and as low as possible.

2009 ◽  
Vol 190 (11) ◽  
pp. 624-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya K Bubner ◽  
Caroline O Laurence ◽  
Angela Gialamas ◽  
Lisa N Yelland ◽  
Philip Ryan ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e006857-e006857 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. C. Schot ◽  
S. van Delft ◽  
A. M. J. Kooijman-Buiting ◽  
N. J. de Wit ◽  
R. M. Hopstaken

2010 ◽  
Vol 60 (572) ◽  
pp. e98-e104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline O Laurence ◽  
Angela Gialamas ◽  
Tanya Bubner ◽  
Lisa Yelland ◽  
Kristyn Willson ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Harvey

BACKGROUND: Critical care practitioners are searching for ways to improve the quality and outcomes of care while decreasing cost and length of stay. One technological advance that may facilitate meeting these objectives is bedside or point-of-care laboratory equipment. Evaluation of point-of-care testing for application in each institution requires information about the devices available; knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of the technologies, the clinical impact, and cost of the process change; and strategies for successful implementation. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on point-of-care testing and the experience of healthcare professionals who have already successfully implemented this type of testing. METHODS: A total of 81 relevant published articles were reviewed, and 21 critical care units in 8 facilities that use point-of-care testing were visited. Open-ended interviews were conducted with 83 subjects: 56 nurses, 14 laboratory personnel, 9 respiratory therapists, and 4 others. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care testing is a technological innovation with the potential for improving patients' care without increasing costs. It most likely will soon become part of the standard of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document