scholarly journals Political Discourse of Jordan: A Critical Discourse Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Ali Al-Momani
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Analysis Theory ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Status ◽  
Psychological Dimensions

Based on the critical discourse analysis theory, the main purpose of this study is to highlight the social and psychological dimensions of the political discourse of Jordan through analyzing king Abdullah’s address to the American Congress in 2007 from socio-cognitive, socio-ideological, and socio-stylistic perspectives. Additionally, the paper uses the critical discourse analysis theory to examine selected quotations from the king’s address in order to see how the Jordanian political discourse is influenced by the status, ideologies, and attitudes of the congressmen to whom it is directed.

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Political Purpose

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

scholarly journals The Political Discourse Behind Canada’s Unusually Harsh Detention Practices: The MV Sun Sea Case

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaina Singh
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Asylum Seekers ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Ideologies ◽  
Analysis Strategy ◽  
The Government

On August 13th 2010, the MV Sun Sea ship carrying 492 Tamil asylum seekers arrived off of the coast of British Columbia. Immediately upon arrival the Tamil asylum seekers were detained for a prolonged period of time, subjected to intensified interrogation techniques, and unfairly questioned even when in possession of identifying documents. This paper examines how the government used political discourse to try and justify the unusually harsh detention of asylum seekers. Through a critical discourse analysis strategy, eight newspaper articles will be analyzed and the theories of securitization, discourse, and orientalism will be used to advance certain political ideologies. The political justifications of detention operate through the theme of the egocentric state, and the theme of categorizing and demonizing asylum seekers. The final theme discussed is the concept of victimization, which will offer an alternate perspective to this paper’s main focus on political discourse.

scholarly journals POSTKOMODIFIKASI PORTAL BERITA DI KOMPAS.COM PADA PEMBERITAAN VAKSIN COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayquni Bayquni ◽  
Prasetya Yoga Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Political Competition ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Discursive Practice ◽  
The Political ◽  
Partisan Identity ◽  
The Government

The coverage of the Covid 19 vaccine on Kompas.com is the object of this research. The purpose of this study is to find out, analyze, and reveal how the political discourse in the news of the Covid 19 Vaccine and how post-commodification of information occurs through the news of the Covid 19 vaccine on Kompas.com. The technique used is documentation. This research is an interpretive qualitative research with a critical paradigm with Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse analysis in this theory is carried out at three levels, namely text, discursive practice, and sociocultural practice. The results showed that the political discourse that developed in the news of the Covid 19 vaccine on Kompas.com was in the practice of media commodification. Political discourse in the news of the Covid-19 vaccine is represented as an identity battle between related parties, especially in government circles. The news on the Covid 19 vaccine, narrated by Kompas.com, is very political to gain recognition, support, and representation of media ideology by turning news into a millennial industry, ammunition for political competition and political partisan identity within the government.

scholarly journals Bahasa dan Ekspresi Politik (Studi Critical Discourse Analysis terhadap Akun Instagram Satir @Nurhadi_Aldo)

ARISTO ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Nunik Hariyanti ◽  
Senja Yustitia
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
New Media ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Identity Politics ◽  
Text Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Media Freedom ◽  
Analysis Theory ◽  
Three Stages

Reforms bring consequences of freedom in political, contending, and media freedom. In the freedom of media, the presence of new media is dynamic in the process of delivering messages and opinions, especially in the realm of democracy. Black issues, polarisation supporters until identity politics also coloring the Indonesian elections in Indonesia in 2019, until finally, the figure @nurhadi_aldo emerged as the presidential candidate version of the Cyber Society. This research discusses text analysis in a discourse, according to Fairclough, the presence of text is a representation of the understanding of the creator, and this is open to interpretation. The purpose of this study describes the use of sexuality and satire language as a form of political expression in Indonesia, especially those that appear on the Nurhadi - Aldo Instagram account (@nurhadi_aldo). There are three stages to analyzing discourse based on Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis theory, namely representation, relation, and identity. The research results show that the language of sexuality and satire used by @nurhadi_aldo is a form of honesty expression to criticize the loss of the essence of an election contestation in Indonesia. Then found bizarre disclosure techniques, hyperbola, contrast, and unexpected techniques of logic use as an attempt to criticize the political phenomenon with @nurhadi_aldo. 

scholarly journals Langue de bois, or, discourse in defense of an offshore financial center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Weeks
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Language Use ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Rationality ◽  
The Social ◽  
Financial Center ◽  
Language Strategies

Abstract This article brings together trends in Critical Discourse Analysis dating from the 1980s – which examine how language use and ideologies (re)produce social inequality – with current research in the social sciences on neoliberalism and other emerging politico-economic formations. The article addresses such a problematic with an empirical case: the language strategies, dubbed langue de bois, that people affiliated with Luxembourg’s offshore financial center employ to justify their practices. The contribution herein surveys the political rationality of the country’s financial center by analyzing the langue de bois that its representatives and boosters use. These language strategies, furthermore, enable Luxembourg’s finance elites to socialize the domestic public’s understanding of their activities.

scholarly journals Analisis Wacana Kritis Konsepsi Relasi Agama dan Negara Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mufatihatul Islam ◽  
Sudono Syueb
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Text Analysis ◽  
Mass Communication ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Communication Media ◽  
The Political ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religion And State

One of the political religious organizations whose influence is strong enough is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia with Islamic Political Discourse Khilafah Islamiyah. The political discourse adopted by Hizb ut-Tahrir certainly reap the controversy in Indonesia whose status is the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which is based on the ideology of Pancasila. Various efforts were made by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia to enforce its political discourse to penetrate mass communication media such as magazines, tabloids and weekly bulletins. The construction of news in such a way is also always in the sequence as interesting and sepersuasif possible as to influence its readers.Critical discourse analysis is a model of media text analysis that will construct how a medium writes its message, through critical discourse analysis to know the purpose of writing the news. In this study, researchers will construct news content on Al Wa'ie magazine Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia especially on the news "Religion Religion and State" in Rubric Afkar.Keywords: Discourse Analysis, Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, Politic

scholarly journals Bahasa dan Ekspresi Politik (Studi Critical Discourse Analysis terhadap Akun Instagram Satir @Nurhadi_Aldo)

ARISTO ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Nunik Hariyanti ◽  
Senja Yustitia
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
New Media ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Identity Politics ◽  
Text Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Media Freedom ◽  
Analysis Theory ◽  
Three Stages

Reforms bring consequences of freedom in political, contending, and media freedom. In the freedom of media, the presence of new media is dynamic in the process of delivering messages and opinions, especially in the realm of democracy. Black issues, polarisation supporters until identity politics also coloring the Indonesian elections in Indonesia in 2019, until finally, the figure @nurhadi_aldo emerged as the presidential candidate version of the Cyber Society. This research discusses text analysis in a discourse, according to Fairclough, the presence of text is a representation of the understanding of the creator, and this is open to interpretation. The purpose of this study describes the use of sexuality and satire language as a form of political expression in Indonesia, especially those that appear on the Nurhadi - Aldo Instagram account (@nurhadi_aldo). There are three stages to analyzing discourse based on Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis theory, namely representation, relation, and identity. The research results show that the language of sexuality and satire used by @nurhadi_aldo is a form of honesty expression to criticize the loss of the essence of an election contestation in Indonesia. Then found bizarre disclosure techniques, hyperbola, contrast, and unexpected techniques of logic use as an attempt to criticize the political phenomenon with @nurhadi_aldo.

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Political Purpose

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

scholarly journals WHO ARE AMERICANS? ANALYSIS OF OBAMA AND TRUMP’S POLITICAL SPEECHES ON IMMIGRATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-87
Author(s):  
Sonia Tinshe ◽  
Junaidi Junaidi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
The Political ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
The Social ◽  
Political Speeches ◽  
American Society

Immigration has been a crucial discussion in the American politics ever since the nation was still writing its constitution. Seeing how immigrants have shaped the American society, it is important to see how they are perceived, as minorities, by significant political figures, such as the president. The objective of this paper is to understand the ideology behind Obama and Trump’s political speeches about immigration, as well as its relevance to the political discourse and social context in America. Five political speeches from Obama (2009-2014), as well as two political speeches from Trump (2016-2017) are analyzed, as the primary data, using Critical Discourse Analysis, particularly Fairclough’s (1993) three-dimensional framework. The finding shows that Obama’s and Trump’s ideology on immigration is related with their idea of the immigrant’s identity in American society. It is shown through their word choice, such as pejorative adjective, and the theme related with the issue of immigration. Seen from the political discourse, the speeches are showing perceived superiority that the presidents have over immigrants. Moreover, from the social perspective, it dehumanizes and reduces the identity of immigrants.

scholarly journals WHO ARE AMERICANS? ANALYSIS OF OBAMA AND TRUMP’S POLITICAL SPEECHES ON IMMIGRATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Sonia Tinshe ◽  
Junaidi Junaidi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
The Political ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
The Social ◽  
Political Speeches ◽  
American Society

Immigration has been a crucial discussion in the American politics ever since the nation was still writing its constitution. Seeing how immigrants have shaped the American society, it is important to see how they are perceived, as minorities, by significant political figures, such as the president. The objective of this paper is to understand the ideology behind Obama and Trump’s political speeches about immigration, as well as its relevance to the political discourse and social context in America. Five political speeches from Obama (2009-2014), as well as two political speeches from Trump (2016-2017) are analyzed, as the primary data, using Critical Discourse Analysis, particularly Fairclough’s (1993) three-dimensional framework. The finding shows that Obama’s and Trump’s ideology on immigration is related with their idea of the immigrant’s identity in American society. It is shown through their word choice, such as pejorative adjective, and the theme related with the issue of immigration. Seen from the political discourse, the speeches are showing perceived superiority that the presidents have over immigrants. Moreover, from the social perspective, it dehumanizes and reduces the identity of immigrants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document