scholarly journals Evaluation Program for the Career Development of Indonesian Navy Civilian Personnel using the Cipp Evaluation Model and Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1309-1316

Nowadays, the implementers of Civilian Personnel (Pegawai Negeri Sipil/PNS) Career Development Programs within the Indonesian Navy are still one with military personnel where their existence is only complementary so that they become less optimal/less focused. In its implementation, it is only carried out by officials at the level of Head of Affair (Superintendent/PNS class III/c), the impacts are low of performance, competence and confidence that can be related with weakening work performance. This study aims to provide an evaluation of Civilian Personnel career development programs within the Indonesian Navy by using the CIPP evaluation approach (Content, Input, Process, Product) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods. Based on the results of the program evaluation study, it can be seen that the results of the Context aspect evaluation amounted to 85.84% with the Excellent category; Input aspects amounted to 76.38% with good categories; Process aspects were 79.77% with good categories; Product aspect is 82.48 in the excellent category. So, the overall evaluation of the Civilian Personnel career development program is 81.12% with an Excellent category. The results of the recommendations state that career development programs need to be revised on several aspects of the criteria.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Dave ◽  
Cheryl Noble ◽  
Caroline Chandler ◽  
Giselle Corbie-Smith ◽  
Claudia S.P. Fernandez

Leadership development programs are notoriously difficult to evaluate, and when evaluations are attempted, they often do not go beyond measuring low-level, short-term outcomes of the impacts experienced by participants. Many leadership development programs do not systematically assess changes that are catalyzed within the organizations, communities and systems in which participants lead. To address these challenges, evaluators of the Clinical Scholars National Leadership Institute (CNLI) have designed a comprehensive, mixed-methods evaluation approach to determine the effectiveness of the training and explore the impacts of participants in the spheres in which they lead. Guided by Michael Patton’s Developmental Evaluation approach and framed by Kirkpatrick’s Training Evaluation Model, the CSNLI evaluation collects data on multiple levels to provide a robust picture of the multiple outcomes of the program. The approach focuses on individual participant outcomes, by measuring competency changes over time and exploring how participants use the competencies gained through the training in their work. Social network analysis is utilized to measure the development and expansion of participants’ networks and collaboration within the teams, cohorts, and across sectors and disciplines throughout their time in the CSNLI. The Most Significant Change methodology and semi-structured alumni interviews are used to measure impacts participants identify as occurring as a result of their participation. Finally, Concept Mapping is implemented to explore how Fellows make meaning of the foundational concepts and values of the CSNLI. The outcome and impact evaluation activities employed by the CSNLI, in combination with quality improvement-focused process evaluation, support innovation and excellence in the provision of a health equity-grounded leadership development program.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Hery Sunandar

The problem of work performance at the foundation has not been maximally measured, only a review of achievements based on an assessment that is considered not perspective because it is not based on accurate points from employees. Regarding solving complex problems based on employee assessments, foundation leaders need to be careful to collect more detailed, accurate, and complete data. Therefore, it is necessary to have a program that can analyze the work and achievements of employees at the foundation. So one of the ways to analyze the assessment is the Analytical Hierarchy Process.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Santic

The significant changes in work and workplaces are making organisational career development programs imperative from both an organisational and individual perspective. Queensland Transport has responded to the demand from its employees for career development tools and resources by committing to the development and implementation of a departmental Career Development Program. This paper outlines the Queensland Transport Career Development Program with a particular emphasis on how it came about, what it entails and the challenges faced. Various initiatives have been implemented to date, yet many challenges lie ahead.


Author(s):  
Xiaoqin Zhang ◽  
Shengxin Wang ◽  
Yanling Cao ◽  
Guangqi Chen

There are two major problems in the evaluation of the teaching quality of English writing: the weak logic of the evaluation system and the low reliability of the evaluation model. To solve the problems, this paper put forward an evaluation method for the teaching quality of English writing based on the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Firstly, the authors reviewed the current evaluation methods for the teaching quality of English writing. Next, hierarchical evaluation systems were established for the teaching quality of English writing from the perspectives of teachers and students, respectively. After that, the AHP method and the grey theory were introduced to set up an evaluation model for the teaching quality of English writing. Finally, several strategies were presented to improve the teaching quality of English writing. The proposed evaluation systems and model enriched the theories on teaching quality evaluation of English writing, and promoted the teaching quality of English writing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh Xuan Cuong ◽  
Hoang Thi Hien ◽  
Tran Long

The commercial banks (CBs) performance evaluating has been a necessary problem in currently integration trend and usually implemented by a committee of experts under criteria selected. Therefore, it is considered as a Multi - Criteria Decision - Making model (MCDM). Nowadays, there have been many researches proposing various standards and models to evaluate and rank CBs. But in Vietnam, the number of studies related to the Vietnamese banking evaluation model have still been limited. As a result, this study develops a multi-criteria decision model integrating Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Fuzzy the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). The proposed model has evaluated and ranked five Vietnamese commercial banks including CTG, VCB, BIDV, TCB and MB. The paper revealed their ranks. Besides, the results of the research show that the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model is suitable for applying it to the process evaluating bank performance.


2011 ◽  
Vol 474-476 ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Hu ◽  
Zhi Bin Liu ◽  
Kai Qi Zou

Based on the characteristic of oilfield development programs, we comprehensive analyzed the influence of development and economical factors on development program, and constructed a comparative evaluation factors system of oilfield development program. In addition, based on the comparative analysis of grey theory and fuzzy evaluation, a grey-fuzzy appraisal method was set up and successfully applied to the evaluation of oilfield development programs. Grey theory was used to describe the factors that are difficult to quantification, and the analytic hierarchy process was used to confirm the appraisal factor’s weight and grey level. Furthermore, we chose eight development programs of an oilfield as our evaluation target and get an option sequence by using the grey-fuzzy method. The result shows that, grey-fuzzy methods have more advantage than fuzzy method in the evaluation of oilfield development programs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 816-817 ◽  
pp. 933-937
Author(s):  
Ru Xin Gou ◽  
Ting Jie Lu

Information systems had been built to meet the requirement of enterprise operations, But the ever-changing market environment leads to unceasing adjustment on enterprise goals, organization structure, business processes of telecommunication companies .The IT architecture should also be adjusted to meet the requirements of enterprise operations. This paper try to investigate on the method of build an evaluation model on IT architecture of a telecommunication company using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The evaluation of the IT architecture is based on a number of criteria (e.g. Completeness, effectiveness, compliance), Measurements need human judgments to estimate their importance and from that importance to develop order and measures priorities, but the pertinent data are difficult to be quantified. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is an effective approach in dealing with this kind of decision problems. Based on experiential knowledge and also by the views of several experts, we can construct a hierarchy model for the evaluation, and a well researched methodology has been adopted for the synthesis of priorities and the measurement of consistencies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document