scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LV MASS ABNORMALITY, EJECTION FRACTION ABNORMALITY AND ABNORMAL E/A RATIO BETWEEN ALCOHOLIC AND NON ALCOHOLIC CIRRHOTICS

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Bharathraj M. Y
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Alcohol Consumption ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Alcoholic Cirrhosis ◽  
Medical Institute ◽  
2D Echocardiography ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Cardiovascular Evaluation

Background : In case of ischemic hepatic disease, patients with severe heart failure usually remain asymptomatic, while for patients with congestive hepatopathy, signs of right-sided heart failure could mask hepatic injury. However, changes in hepatic function, that are proven by laboratory tests are significant¬ in predicting the survival of patients with severe heart failure. There is possible considerable changes in the involvement of cardiac morbidity among both alcoholics and non alcoholics. This study evaluates the cardiac profile of cirrhotic individuals with respect to their alcohol consumption. Materials and methods : It is a comparative cross sectional study carried out at Medical department of SSIMS and RC, a tertiary medical institute in central part of the Karnataka. Study randomly selected patients with cirrhosis which comprised of 50 alcoholics and 50 non alcoholics. A normal group of 50 individuals without history of alcohol consumption and cirrhosis were selected for secondary comparison. Non Probability Purposive Sampling Technique is used and data was analyzed using latest SPSS for windows. Results : ECHO revealed that all the patients with alcoholic and non alcoholic cirrhosis had abnormal LVIDd (>56mm). LV mass abnormality was found among 76% of patients with non alcoholic cirrhosis compared to 66% of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. High Ejection fraction abnormality was found among only 4% of patients with non alcoholic cirrhosis. The abnormal E/A ratio was observed among 8% of patients with non alcoholic cirrhosis compared to 4% of alcoholic cirrhosis patients. Conclusion : 2D Echocardiography showed increase in LAD, LVIDd and LV mass among cirrhotic patients thereby suggesting definitive cardiac involvement. The cardiovascular abnormalities did not show much differences between the alcoholic and non alcoholic patients. all cirrhotic patients irrespective of their aetiology has to undergo a cardiovascular evaluation.

scholarly journals Left ventricular fibrosis and hypertrophy are associated with mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Garg ◽  
Hosamadin Assadi ◽  
Rachel Jones ◽  
Wei Bin Chan ◽  
Peter Metherall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
T1 Mapping ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Native T1 ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Ventricular Fibrosis

AbstractCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is emerging as an important tool in the assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of multiparametric CMR, including left and right heart volumetric assessment, native T1-mapping and LGE in HFpEF. In this retrospective study, we identified patients with HFpEF who have undergone CMR. CMR protocol included: cines, native T1-mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The mean follow-up period was 3.2 ± 2.4 years. We identified 86 patients with HFpEF who had CMR. Of the 86 patients (85% hypertensive; 61% males; 14% cardiac amyloidosis), 27 (31%) patients died during the follow up period. From all the CMR metrics, LV mass (area under curve [AUC] 0.66, SE 0.07, 95% CI 0.54–0.76, p = 0.02), LGE fibrosis (AUC 0.59, SE 0.15, 95% CI 0.41–0.75, p = 0.03) and native T1-values (AUC 0.76, SE 0.09, 95% CI 0.58–0.88, p < 0.01) were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality. The optimum thresholds for these were: LV mass > 133.24 g (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.1–2.2, p < 0.01); LGE-fibrosis > 34.86% (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.1–2.8, p = 0.01) and native T1 > 1056.42 ms (HR 2.36, 95% CI 0.9–6.4, p = 0.07). In multivariate cox regression, CMR score model comprising these three variables independently predicted mortality in HFpEF when compared to NTproBNP (HR 4 vs HR 1.65). In non-amyloid HFpEF cases, only native T1 > 1056.42 ms demonstrated higher mortality (AUC 0.833, p < 0.01). In patients with HFpEF, multiparametric CMR aids prognostication. Our results show that left ventricular fibrosis and hypertrophy quantified by CMR are associated with all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF.

scholarly journals Central and obstructive apneas prevalence in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Borrelli ◽  
P Sciarrone ◽  
F Gentile ◽  
N Ghionzoli ◽  
G Mirizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
2D Echocardiography

Abstract Background Central apneas (CA) and obstructive apneas (OA) are highly prevalent in heart failure (HF) both with reduced and preserved systolic function. However, a comprehensive evaluation of apnea prevalence across HF according to ejection fraction (i.e HF with patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction- HFrEf, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively) throughout the 24 hours has never been done before. Materials and methods 700 HF patients were prospectively enrolled and then divided according to left ventricular EF (408 HFrEF, 117 HFmrEF, 175 HFpEF). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation including: 2D echocardiography; 24-h Holter-ECG monitoring; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; neuro-hormonal assessment and 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring. Results In the whole population, prevalence of normal breathing (NB), CA and OA at daytime was 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively, while at nighttime 15%, 55%, and 30%, respectively. When stratified according to left ventricular EF, CA prevalence decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF and HFpEF: (daytime CA: 57% vs. 43% vs. 42%, respectively, p=0.001; nighttime CA: 66% vs. 48% vs. 34%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001), while OA prevalence increased (daytime OA: 5% vs. 8% vs. 18%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001; nighttime OA: 20 vs. 29 vs. 53%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001). When assessing moderte-severe apneas, defined with an apnea/hypopnea index &gt;15 events/hour, prevalence of CA was again higher in HFrEF than HFmrEF and HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe CA: 28% vs. 19% and 23%, respectively, p&lt;0.05) and at nighttime (nighttime moderate-severe CA: 50% vs. 39% and 28%, respectively, p&lt;0.05). Conversely, moderate-severe OA decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF to HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe OA: 1% vs. 3% and 8%, respectively, p&lt;0.05) and nighttime (noghttime moderate-severe OA: 10% vs. 11% and 30%, respectively, p&lt;0.05). Conclusions Daytime and nighttime apneas, both central and obstructive in nature, are highly prevalent in HF regardless of EF. Across the whole spectrum of HF, CA prevalence increases and OA decreases as left ventricular systolic dysfunction progresses, both during daytime and nighttime. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 13944: Biracial Proteomic Profiling Reveals Novel Candidate Pathways in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Incident Heart Failure Specific to Black Individuals

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H Katz ◽  
Usman A Tahir ◽  
Debby Ngo ◽  
Mark Benson ◽  
Yan Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Proteomic Profiling ◽  
2D Echocardiography ◽  
Heart Study ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
Leukotriene A4 ◽  
Incident Cases

Background: Increased left ventricular (LV) mass is associated with future adverse cardiovascular events including heart failure (HF). Both increased LV mass and HF disproportionately affect black individuals. To understand the mechanisms that drive disease, particularly in black individuals, we undertook a proteomic screen in a black cohort and compared it to a white cohort. Methods: We measured 1305 plasma proteins using an aptamer-based proteomic platform (SOMAscan™) in 1772 black participants in the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) with available baseline LV mass as assessed by 2D echocardiography, as well as 1600 free of HF with follow-up assessment of incident cases. Mean follow-up time was 11 years; 152 cases of incident HF hospitalization were identified. Models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate (as calculated by CKD-EPI equation), systolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, presence of diabetes, total/HDL cholesterol, prevalent coronary disease, and current smoking status. Incident HF models were also adjusted for incident coronary heart disease. We then compared protein associations in JHS to those observed in whites from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) to examine significant differences. Results: In JHS, there were 112 proteins associated with LV mass and 10 proteins associated with incident HF hospitalization with FDR <5%. Several proteins showed expected associations with both LV mass and HF, including N-terminal pro-BNP (β = 0.04 [0.02, 0.05], p = 1.0 x 10 -8 , HR = 1.46 [1.20, 1.79], p = 0.0002). The strongest association with LV mass was more novel: leukotriene A4 hydrolase (LKHA4) (β = 0.05 [0.04, 0.06], p = 2.6 x 10 -15 ). Conversely, Fractalkine/CX3CL1 showed a novel association with incident HF (HR = 1.32 [1.14, 1.54], p = 0.0003). While proteins like Cystatin C and N-terminal pro-BNP showed consistent effects in FHS, LKHA4 and Fractalkine were significantly different. Conclusions: We identify several novel biological pathways specific to black individuals hypothesized to contribute to the pathophysiologic cascade of LV hypertrophy and incident HF including LKHA4 and Fractalkine. Further studies are needed to validate these results and elucidate the detailed underlying mechanisms.

The use of peripherally inserted central catheter reduced the incidence of phlebitis in heart failure patients: A randomized trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110596
Author(s):  
Eunice Vieira Cavalcante Silva ◽  
Marcelo Eidi Ochiai ◽  
Kelly Regina Novaes Vieira ◽  
Antonio Carlos Pereira Barretto
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Peripheral Venous Access ◽  
And Control

Background: During decompensated heart failure, the use of intravenous inotropes can be necessary. With peripheral venous access, prolonged inotrope infusion can cause phlebitis. However, traditional central venous catheters have possible complications. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) may be an alternative to traditional catheters. Aim: Our objective was to compare the incidence of phlebitis between patients with PICC and those with peripheral venous access catheter indwelling. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, the patients were randomized to PICC and control groups, with 40 patients in each group. The inclusion criteria were hospitalized patients with advanced heart failure, ejection fraction of <0.45, and platelet count of >50,000/mm3 and current use of continuous intravenous infusion of dobutamine. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a PICC or keep their peripheral venous access. The primary end point was the occurrence of phlebitis. Results: The PICC and control groups included 40 patients each. The median age was 61.5 years; ejection fraction, 0.24; and dobutamine dose, 7.73 µg/(kg min). Phlebitis occurred in 1 patient (2.5%) in the PICC group and in 38 patients (95.0%) in the control group, with an odds ratio of 0.10% (95% confidence interval: 0.01%–1.60%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, in severe heart failure patients who received intravenous dobutamine, PICC use reduced the incidence of phlebitis when compared to patients with peripheral venous access. Therefore, the PICC use should considered over peripheral venous access for prolonged intravenous therapy in heart failure patients.

scholarly journals P738 Association of galectin-3 and soluble ST2, and their changes, with echocardiographic parameters and development of heart failure after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tyminska ◽  
A Kaplon-Cieslicka ◽  
K Ozieranski ◽  
M Budnik ◽  
A Wancerz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
Galectin 3 ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background The occurrence of HF (heart failure) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has risen significantly over the past decade. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and soluble ST2 (sST2) are involved in inflammatory processes and fibrosis and might be useful in estimation of the risk of HFpEF development after myocardial infarction (MI).Purpose: To investigate the association of Gal-3 and sST2, and their follow-up changeswith echocardiographic parameters of systolic and diastolic dysfunctionin patients (pts) with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods:A prospective, observational study, BIOSTRAT (NCT03735719), enrolled 117 pts. Gal-3 and sST2 serum collection and echocardiography were performed twice (during index hospitalization and on a control visit at one-year follow-up). Assessedat baseline and at one-year echocardiographic indices included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), atrial and ventricular size, LV posterior wall and septal thickness, LV hypertrophy based on LV mass index, mitral inflow velocities, and early diastolic tissue velocities at the lateral and medial mitral annulus. Results:Mean baseline concentrations of Gal-3 and sST2 (7.5 and 26.4 ng/mL, respectively) were increased at one-year follow-up (8.5 ng/mL, p &lt; 0.001 and 31.4 ng/mL, p = 0.001, respectively). Fifty of 105 pts (48%) developed HF and 30% of the study population had LVEF &lt;50% at one-year. There were no significant differences between pts with LVEF &lt;50% and ≥50% in terms of baseline, follow-up, nor changes in Gal-3 and sST2 concentrations from baseline to the one-year visit. Gal-3 and sST2 concentrations at baseline, after one-year, and their changes were correlated with echocardiographic parameters. Correlation analysis revealed that higher baseline Gal-3 concentrations correlated inversely only with LV end-diastolic volume at one-year. There were no other significant correlations of baseline, follow-up, nor changes in Gal-3 concentration with echocardiographic parameters. Baseline sST2 values correlated positively with LV end-diastolic diameter, LV end-systolic volume, LV mass index, and inversely with LVEF at one-year, but not with baseline echocardiographic parameters. Changes in sST2 concentration correlated positively only with LVEF at one-year. There were no significant correlations of sST2 concentrations at follow-up with echocardiographic parameters. Only pts with a higher sST2 baseline level had lower LVEF at baseline and after one-year, and pts with higher concentrations of both Gal-3 and sST2 at baseline were more likely to have LV hypertrophy initially and after one-year. There was no clear association of rising biomarkers’ quartiles with other echocardiographic parameters. Conclusions:There was no clear association between both biomarkers and echocardiographic parametersof diastolic dysfunction. Increasing levels of Gal-3 and sST2 do not reflect the HFpEF development in pts after STEMI.

scholarly journals Differential left ventricular and left atrial remodelling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients with and without diabetes

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 204201881986159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav S. Gulsin ◽  
Prathap Kanagala ◽  
Daniel C. S. Chan ◽  
Adrian S. H. Cheng ◽  
Lavanya Athithan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Markers Of Inflammation ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
Mass Volume

Background: Attempts to characterize cardiac structure in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have yielded inconsistent findings. We aimed to determine whether patients with HFpEF and T2D have a distinct pattern of cardiac remodelling compared with those without diabetes and whether remodelling was related to circulating markers of inflammation and fibrosis and clinical outcomes. Methods: We recruited 140 patients with HFpEF (75 with T2D and 65 without). Participants underwent comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and plasma biomarker profiling. Results: Patients with T2D were younger (age 70 ± 9 versus 75 ± 9y, p = 0.002), with evidence of more left ventricular (LV) concentric remodelling (LV mass/volume ratio 0.72 ± 0.15 versus 0.62 ± 0.16, p = 0.024) and smaller indexed left atrial (LA) volumes (maximal LA volume index 48 ± 20 versus 59 ± 29 ml/m2, p = 0.004) than those without diabetes. Plasma biomarkers of inflammation and extracellular matrix remodelling were elevated in those with T2D. Overall, there were 45 hospitalizations for HF and 22 deaths over a median follow-up period of 47 months [interquartile range (IQR) 38–54]. There was no difference in the primary composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF and mortality between groups. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, age, prior HF hospitalization, history of pulmonary disease and LV mass/volume were independent predictors of the primary endpoint. Conclusions: Patients with HFpEF and T2D have increased concentric LV remodelling, smaller LA volumes and evidence of increased systemic inflammation compared with those without diabetes. This suggests the underlying pathophysiology for the development of HFpEF is different in patients with and without T2D. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03050593.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document