DIAGNOSTIC ROLE OF CHEST CT USING CO-RADS CATEGORIZATION IN SARS-COV-2 INFECTION WITH EMPHASIS ON IMPACT OF CT IN PATIENTS WITH DELAYED OR NEGATIVE INITIAL RTPCR TEST

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-52
Author(s):  
Tharani Putta ◽  
Kaushik Deconda
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Lung Involvement ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Diagnostic Role ◽  
Pcr Test

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Role of chest CT in diagnosis of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest CT when utilizing COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). METHODOLOGY: Retrospective study including consecutive patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test (initial or repeat test) and chest CT done in our institute between June and September 2020. Spectrum of CT ndings, CO-RADS score and 25 point CT severity score (CTSS) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 300 consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in the analysis. Out of the 168 patients who underwent CT prior to positive RT-PCR result, 125 (74.4%) had CO-RADS 3, 4 or 5 score on chest CT. 32 study patients (10.6%) had initial negative RT-PCR of which 24 (75%) had CO-RADS 4 or 5 score. Of the total patients with CO-RADS 3 to 5 score (227), 20 (8.8%) had severe lung involvement (CTSS 18-25), 83 (36.6%) had moderate lung involvement (CTSS 8-17) and 124 (54.6%) had mild lung involvement (CTSS 1-7). The mean CTSS was 7.9 with mean lobar score being higher in lower lobes (RLL=1.82, LLL=1.78) compared to the upper and middle lobes (RUL=1.61, RML=1.19, LUL=1.53). CONCLUSION:CT using CO-RADS scoring system has good diagnostic performance. In addition to assessing disease severity, it plays a vital role in triage of patients with suspected COVID-19 especially when there is limited availability of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests, delay in RT-PCR test results or in negative RT-PCR cases when there is high index of clinical suspicion.

scholarly journals Screening COVID-19 with Chest CT in Preference to RT-PCR: Based on Mortality Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanlong Xie ◽  
Minhao Wu ◽  
Chong Zhang ◽  
Yufan Zhu ◽  
Kun Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mortality Analysis ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) became the outbreak of infectious diseases emergency worldwide. It remains unknown whether the RT-PCR test results was associated with the prognosis of COVID-19 patients or not. In this study, a total number of 495 patients with typical chest CT feature and symptom consistent with COVID-19 were retrospectively included from Jan 23, 2020 to Feb 26, 2020. 186 (37.58%), 32 (6.46%) and 277 (55.96%) COVID-19 patients had initial positive, suspected and negative RT-PCR results, respectively. The mean age was 58.55 years and 254(51.3%) were older than 60 years. 60.00% (297/495), 22.02% (109/495) and 17.98% (89/495) of COVID-19 patients were common, severe and critically type, respectively. There were no significant differences of age, gender, time from onset to hospitalization and severity classification in the patients with initial positive and negative RT-PCR result. The mortality rate of patients with positive and negative were 7.14% and 7.94%. Patients with initial negative or initial positive RT-PCR results had no significant difference of mortality rate (c2=4.079, p=0.130). The number of patients with lymphocyte ratios under the normal level was significantly larger in patients with initial negative RT-PCR results (59/92) compared with the patients with initial positive result (86/167), p=0.033. COVID-19 patients with positive or negative RT-PCR results had no significant difference in severity and mortality. Chest CT may be a more effective tool to screen COVID-19 in preference to RT-PCR.

scholarly journals Association Between rRT-PCR Test Results Upon Admission and Outcome in Hospitalized Chest CT-Positive COVID-19 Patients: A Provincial Retrospective Cohort with Active Follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Nemati ◽  
Hamid Reza Najari ◽  
Anita Eftekharzadeh ◽  
Amir Mohammad Kazemifar ◽  
Ali Qandian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Test

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic imposed the most devastating challenge on healthcare systems worldwide. Iran was among the first countries that had to confront serious shortages in reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and ventilators availabilities throughout the COVID-19 outbreak. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the clinical course of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with different real-time RT-PCR test results during the first three weeks of the outbreak in Qazvin province, Iran. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with a positive chest computed tomography (CT) scan for COVID-19 who were admitted to all 12 hospitals across Qazvin province, Iran, between February 20 and March 11, 2020, were included and followed up until March 27, 2020. A multivariate logistic regression model was applied to compare the independent associates of death among COVID-19 patients. Then, patients were categorized into six groups based on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and rRT-PCR test status (positive, negative, or no test). Also, multilevel logistic regression was used to compare the odds of surviving in each group against the reference group (PCR negative patients not-received ICU) to show if the rational allocation of ICU occurred while its capacity is limited. Results: In this study, we included 998 patients (57% male; median age: 54 years) with positive chest CT scan changes. Among them, 558 patients were examined with rRT-PCR test and 73.8% tested positive. Case fatality rate (CFR) was 20.68 and 7.53% among hospitalized patients with positive and negative tests, respectively. While only 5.2% of patients were admitted to the ICU, CFR outside ICU was 17.70 and 4.65% in patients with positive and negative results not admitted to the ICU, respectively. Conclusions: Total CFR in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Qazvin province during the first three weeks of the pandemic was 11.7%. Also, according to the results, the main risk factors included a positive rRT-PCR test, age more than 70 years, and having two or more comorbidities or just immunodeficiency disorders. Hence, the ICU admission criteria or prioritized ICU beds allocation should be considered with more emphasis on rRT-PCR results when the capacity of ICU beds is low.

scholarly journals Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Candidate Chest CT Features: A Systematic Review of Extracted Imaging Features from 7571 Individuals

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Zahiri ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Afsharinia ◽  
Zhaleh Hekmati ◽  
Mohsen Khodarahmi ◽  
Shahrzad Hekmati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Lung Involvement ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Bilateral Lung ◽  
Pcr Test

AbstractSince the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) causing novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-infected pneumonia (NCIP), over 45 million affected cases have been reported worldwide. Many patients with COVID-19 have involvement of their respiratory system. According to studies in the radiology literature, chest computed tomography (CT) is recommended in suspected cases for initial detection, evaluating the disease progression and monitoring the response to therapy. The aim of this article is to review the most frequently reported imaging features in COVID-19 patients in order to provide a reliable insight into expected CT imaging manifestations in patients with positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results, and also for the initial detection of patients with suspicious clinical presentation whose RT-PCR test results are false negative. A total of 60 out of 173 initial COVID-19 studies, comprising 7571 individuals, were identified by searching PubMed database for articles published between the months of January and June 2020. The data of these studies were related to patients from China, Japan, Italy, USA, Iran and Singapore. Among 40 reported features, presence of ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidation, bilateral lung involvement and peripheral distribution are the most frequently observed ones, reported in 100%, 91.7%, 85%, and 83.3% of articles, respectively. In a similar way, we extracted CT imaging studies of similar pulmonary syndromes outbreaks caused by other strains of coronavirus family: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). For MERS and SARS, 2 out of 21 and 5 out of 153 initially retrieved studies had CT findings, respectively. Herein, we have indicated the most common coronavirus family related and COVID-19 specific features. Presence of GGO, consolidation, bilateral lung involvement and peripheral distribution were the features reported in at least 83% of COVID-19 articles, while air bronchogram, multi-lobe involvement and linear opacity were the three potential COVID-19 specific CT imaging findings. This is necessary to recognize the most promising imaging features for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, we identified co-existed CT imaging features.

scholarly journals Diagnostic performance of chest computed tomography during the epidemic wave of COVID-19 varied as a function of time since the beginning of the confinement in France

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242840
Author(s):  
Samia Boussouar ◽  
Mathilde Wagner ◽  
Victoria Donciu ◽  
Nicoletta Pasi ◽  
Joe Elie Salem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
First Line ◽  
Chest Computed Tomography ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Epidemic Wave

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the initial chest CT to diagnose COVID-19 related pneumonia in a French population of patients with respiratory symptoms according to the time from the onset of country-wide confinement to better understand what could be the role of the chest CT in the different phases of the epidemic. Material and method Initial chest CT of 1064 patients with respiratory symptoms suspect of COVID-19 referred between March 18th, and May 12th 2020, were read according to a standardized procedure. The results of chest CTs were compared to the results of the RT-PCR. Results 546 (51%) patients were found to be positive for SARS-CoV2 at RT-PCR. The highest rate of positive RT-PCR was during the second week of confinement reaching 71.9%. After six weeks of confinement, the positive RT-PCR rate dropped significantly to 10.5% (p<0.001) and even 2.2% during the two last weeks. Overall, CT revealed patterns suggestive of COVID-19 in 603 patients (57%), whereas an alternative diagnosis was found in 246 patients (23%). CT was considered normal in 215 patients (20%) and inconclusive in 1 patient. The overall sensitivity of CT was 88%, specificity 76%, PPV 79%, and NPV 85%. At week-2, the same figures were 89%, 69%, 88% and 71% respectively and 60%, 84%, 30% and 95% respectively at week-6. At the end of confinement when the rate of positive PCR became extremely low the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CT were 50%, 82%, 6% and 99% respectively. Conclusion At the peak of the epidemic, chest CT had sufficiently high sensitivity and PPV to serve as a first-line positive diagnostic tool but at the end of the epidemic wave CT is more useful to exclude COVID-19 pneumonia.

scholarly journals How Did Radiologists’ Diagnostic Accuracy Have Changed in Covid-19 Pneumonia; a Single Centre Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Murat Koc ◽  
Levent Altın ◽  
Türker Acar ◽  
Alpay Arı ◽  
Zehra Hilal Adıbelli
Keyword(s):  
Chest Ct ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Educational Activities ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Interpretation Errors ◽  
Concomitant Factors ◽  
Level Of Experience ◽  
Pcr Test

Aims Delay and false positivity in PCR test results have necessitated accurate chest CT reporting for management of patients with COVID-19 suspected symptoms. Pandemic related workload and level of experience on covid-dedicated chest CT scans might have effected diagnostic performance of on-call radiologists. The aim of this study is to reveal the interpretation errors in chest-CT reports of COVID-19 suspected patients admitted to the ER. Methods COVID-19 dedicated chest-CT scans which were performed between March and June 2020 were re-evaluated and compared with the former reports of these scans and PCR test results. CT scan results were classified into four groups. Parenchymal involvement ratios, radiology departments’ workload, COVID-19 related educational activities have examined. Results Out of 5721 Chest-CT scans, 783 CTs belonging to 664 patients (340 female, 324 male) were included to this study. RT-PCR test was positive in 398; negative in 385 cases. PCR positivity was found to be highest in “normal” and “typical for covid” groups whereas lowest in “atypical for covid” and “not covid” groups. 5-25% parenchymal involvement ratio was found in 84.2% of the cases. Regarding number of chest CT scans performed, radiologists’ workload have found to be increased six-folds compared to the same months of the former year. With the re-evaluation, a total of 145 IEs (18.5%) have been found. IEs were mostly precipitated in the first two months (88.3%) and mostly in “not covid” class (60%) regardless of PCR positivity. COVID-19 and radiology entitled educational activities along with the ER admission rates within the first two months of pandemic have seem to be related with the decline of IEs within time. Conclusion COVID-19 pandemic made a great impact on radiology departments with an inevitable burden of daily chest-CT reporting. This workload and concomitant factors have possible effects on diagnostic challenges in COVID-19 pneumonia.

scholarly journals Spectrum of CT appearance and CT severity index of COVID-19 pulmonary infection in correlation with age, sex, and PCR test: an Iraqi experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ammar Mosa Al-Mosawe ◽  
Hiba mohammed Abdulwahid ◽  
Noor Abbas Hummadi Fayadh
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Lung Involvement ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Pulmonary Changes ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Background Since June 2020, an explosion in number of new COVID-19 patients has been reported in Iraq with a steady increment in new daily reported cases over the next 3 months. The limited number of PCR kits in the country and the increment in the number of new COVID-19 cases makes the role of CT scan examinations rising and becoming essential in aiding the health institutions in diagnosing and isolating infected patients and those in close contacts. This study will review the spectrum of CT pulmonary changes due to COVID-19 infection and estimate the CT severity score index and its relation to age, sex, and PCR test results. Results The ground glass opacities were the most common encountered pattern of pulmonary changes and were seen in (79%). There was strong positive correlation between higher CT severity score and male gender (p value = 0.0002, R2 = 0.9). Also, there was significant correlation of CT severity score and increasing age (p value less than 0.00018). Significant correlation was seen between CT scan percentage of lung involvement and positive PCR test results (p value = 0.001917), as the CT severity index is increasing, the PCR test is more likely to be positive. Conclusions Chest CT is an important and fast imaging tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19-infected patients especially in developing countries. In addition, chest CT can predict the disease severity by showing the percentage of lung involvement and hence give an idea about the prognosis of the disease. Higher CT severity score is significantly correlated with male gender, older age group patients and likely positive PCR test.

scholarly journals Chest CT features of COVID-19 in the region of Abu Dhabi, UAE- A single institute study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghufran Aref Saeed ◽  
Abeer Ahmed Al Helali ◽  
Safaa Almazrouei ◽  
Asad Shah ◽  
Luai A. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Abu Dhabi ◽  
Ground Glass ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Chest Ct Scan ◽  
Ct Features ◽  
Pcr Test

AbstractOBJECTIVEOur aim is to investigate high resolution CT features of COVID-19 infection in Abu Dhabi, UAE, and to compare the diagnostic performance of CT scan with RT-PCR test.METHODSData of consecutive patients who were suspected to have COVID-19 infection and presented to our hospital, was collected from March 2, 2020, until April 12, 2020. All patients underwent RT-PCR test; out of which 53.8% had chest CT scan done. Using RT-PCR as a standard reference, the sensitivity and specify of CT scan was calculated. We also analyzed the most common imaging findings in patients with positive RT-PCR results.RESULTSThe typical HRCT findings were seen in 50 scans (65.8%) out of total positive ones; 44 (77.2%) with positive RT-PCR results and 6 (31.6%) with negative results. The peripheral disease distribution was seen in 86%, multilobe involvement in 70%, bilateral in 82%, and posterior in 82% of the 50 scans.The ground glass opacities were seen in 50/74 (89.3%) of positive RT-PCR group. The recognized GGO patterns in these scans were: rounded 50%, linear 38%, and crazy-paving 24%.Using RT-PCR as a standard of reference, chest HRCT scan revealed sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 70%.CONCLUSIONThe commonest HRCT findings in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were peripheral, posterior, bilateral, multilobe rounded ground glass opacities.

scholarly journals Role of CT scan thorax in nCovid19—a case-based review

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu sharma Moleyar ◽  
Anupama Noojibail ◽  
Nagaraj shetty I ◽  
Harsha D S ◽  
Nithish Bhandary M
Keyword(s):  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Health Care Expenditure ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Lung Involvement ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pulmonary Angiogram ◽  
Chest Ct Scan ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Background Most of the morbidity and mortality in nCovid19 is due to pneumonia which can be reduced by early diagnosis and treatment. Chest CT scan plays an important role in the early diagnosis and management of respiratory complications due to nCovid19. Clinicians should be aware about the indications for the CT scan of the thorax, timing of investigation, and limitations of CT. Main body of abstract Chest CT scan is indicated in patients with moderate to severe respiratory symptoms and pretest probability of nCovid19 infection, when RT-PCR test results are negative, and in patients for whom an RT-PCR test is not performed or not readily available. When a rapid antigen test is negative and an RT-PCR test report takes time, CT can be used in seriously ill patients to decide whether it is COVID or not. For patients who are dependent on oxygen even after 2 weeks, CT may help to show the extent of lung involvement and predict long-term prognosis. CT may be done to exclude nCovid19 pneumonia. For patients with high risk for nCovid19 who require an immediate diagnosis to rule out lung involvement, CT can be done. A normal CT excludes nCovid19 pneumonia. CT scan is required in confirmed cases of nCovid19 pneumonia when complications are suspected clinically. These include pulmonary thromboembolism, pneumothorax, mediastinal/surgical emphysema, bacterial pneumonia, and unexplained deterioration with new shadows in chest X-ray. CT pulmonary angiogram is indicated when pulmonary embolism is suspected, and in other cases, plain CT should be done. In pre-operative cases where emergency surgery is required, nCovid19 disease is suspected clinically, and RT-PCR report awaited or not available, CT thorax can be done. Conclusion CT scan is useful for early diagnosis of lung involvement, detection complications, triaging of cases, risk stratification, and preoperative evaluation in select cases. CT scan should be done only when there is a definite indication so to reduce radiation hazards and to reduce health care expenditure. Normal CT excludes nCovid19 lung involvement, but the patient may have upper respiratory involvement which may progress later to involve lungs.

scholarly journals Diagnostic performance of chest CT in differentiating COVID-19 from other causes of ground-glass opacities

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali H. Elmokadem ◽  
Dalia Bayoumi ◽  
Sherif A. Abo-Hedibah ◽  
Ahmed El-Morsy
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Pulmonary Nodules ◽  
Ground Glass Opacity ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Ground Glass ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Halo Sign ◽  
Traction Bronchiectasis ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

Abstract Background To evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest CT in differentiating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 causes of ground-glass opacities (GGO). Results A total of 80 patients (49 males and 31 females, 46.48 ± 16.09 years) confirmed with COVID-19 by RT-PCR and who underwent chest CT scan within 2 weeks of symptoms, and 100 patients (55 males and 45 females, 48.94 ± 18.97 years) presented with GGO on chest CT were enrolled in the study. Three radiologists reviewed all CT chest exams after removal of all identifying data from the images. They expressed the result as positive or negative for COVID-19 and recorded the other pulmonary CT features with mention of laterality, lobar affection, and distribution pattern. The clinical data and laboratory findings were recorded. Chest CT offered diagnostic accuracy ranging from 59 to 77.2% in differentiating COVID-19- from non-COVID-19-associated GGO with sensitivity from 76.25 to 90% and specificity from 45 to 67%. The specificity was lower when differentiating COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 viral pneumonias (30.5–61.1%) and higher (53.1–70.3%) after exclusion of viral pneumonia from the non-COVID-19 group. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to have lesions in lower lobes (p = 0.005), peripheral distribution (p < 0.001), isolated ground-glass opacity (p = 0.043), subpleural bands (p = 0.048), reverse halo sign (p = 0.005), and vascular thickening (p = 0.013) but less likely to have pulmonary nodules (p < 0.001), traction bronchiectasis (p = 0.005), pleural effusion (p < 0.001), and lymphadenopathy (p < 0.001). Conclusions Chest CT offered reasonable sensitivity when differentiating COVID-19- from non-COVID-19-associated GGO with low specificity when differentiating COVID-19 from other viral pneumonias and moderate specificity when differentiating COVID-19 from other causes of GGO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document