scholarly journals DISPOSITIONAL TRAITS AS PREDICTORS OF SELF-EFFICACY

2020 ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
Elena Lisá ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Achievement Motivation ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Career Decision ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Personality Theory ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Specific Career ◽  
General Self Efficacy

Introduction: We started from Bandura's theory of self-efficacy, the onion model of achievement motivation according to Schuler & Prochaska, and the 5-factor personality theory by Costa & McCrae. The study aimed to analyze the predictive power of achievement motivation and personality traits on general self-efficacyand domain-specific career decision self-efficacy. We expected the more significant relationship of stable personality characteristics with general self-efficacy than with specific-domain career decision self-efficacy. Methods: 690adult participants (university students and working adults) completed a career decision self-efficacy questionnaire,and 268of them a general self-efficacy scale. All participants also fulfilled an achievement motivation questionnaire and afive-factor personality theory questionnaire. Results: All five personality traits, combined with four dimensions of achievement motivation (dominance, confidence in success, self-control, and competitiveness) explain 61% of general self-efficacy variability. Extraversion, agreeableness, andconscientiousness with six achievement motivation dimensions (dominance, engagement, confidence in success, fearlessness, competitiveness, and goal setting) explain 42.5% of career decision self-efficacy variability. Discussion: Stable traits and achievement motivation dimensions had more significant predictive power on general self-efficacy than on domain-specific career decision self-efficacy. For further research, there is a suggestion about a theoretically and empirically integrated model of dispositional and social-cognitive approaches.

The Joint Roles of Career Decision Self-Efficacy and Personality Traits in the Prediction of Career Decidedness and Decisional Difficulty

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee T. Penn ◽  
Robert W. Lent
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Cognitive Model ◽  
Career Decision ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Career Decision Making ◽  
The Social ◽  
Social Cognitive Model

We examined the differential roles that career decision-making self-efficacy and the Big Five traits of neuroticism, extroversion, and conscientiousness may play in relation to career decision status and decisional difficulty. Following assumptions of the social cognitive model of career self-management, we hypothesized that the relations of the personality traits to level of decidedness and choice/commitment anxiety (CCA), a key source of indecision, would be mediated by self-efficacy. We also examined the possibility that the traits could function to moderate the relation of self-efficacy to the dependent variables. Employing a sample of 182 undergraduates, we found support for a mediational model in which each of the personality traits relates to self-efficacy which, in turn, predicts CCA and decidedness. In addition, conscientiousness was found to moderate the relation of career decision-making self-efficacy to CCA, and extroversion moderated the relation of self-efficacy to decidedness. We consider the findings in relation to the social cognitive model and discuss their implications for future research and career decision-making interventions.

scholarly journals Predictive power of task orientation, general self-efficacy and self-determined motivation on fun and boredom

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Ruiz-González ◽  
Antonio Videra ◽  
Juan Antonio Moreno-Murcia
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Task Orientation ◽  
Likert Scales ◽  
Educational Task ◽  
Structural Regression ◽  
Task Oriented ◽  
Sport Motivation Scale ◽  
General Self Efficacy

Abstract The aim of this study was to test the predictive power of dispositional orientations, general self-efficacy and self-determined motivation on fun and boredom in physical education classes, with a sample of 459 adolescents between 13 and 18 with a mean age of 15 years (SD = 0.88). The adolescents responded to four Likert scales: Perceptions of Success Questionnaire, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Sport Motivation Scale and Intrinsic Satisfaction Questionnaire in Sport. The results showed the structural regression model showed that task orientation and general self-efficacy positively predicted self-determined motivation and this in turn positively predicted more fun and less boredom in physical education classes. Consequently, the promotion of an educational task-oriented environment where learners perceive their progress and make them feel more competent, will allow them to overcome the intrinsically motivated tasks, and therefore they will have more fun. Pedagogical implications for less boredom and more fun in physical education classes are discussed.

New trend of authentic leadership skills in nursing education: The key role of perfectionism and self-efficacy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariusz Jaworski ◽  
Mariusz Panczyk ◽  
Anna Leńczuk-Gruba ◽  
Agnieszka Nowacka ◽  
Joanna Gotlib
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Authentic Leadership ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Personal Variables ◽  
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Beta Coefficient ◽  
General Self Efficacy

Abstract Background: In the literature the need to shape leadership skills in nursing in the process of education is stressed. In order for it to be effective, actions need to be undertaken including some personality traits which may frequently be observed in students of nursing (e.g. perfectionism and self-efficacy). The role of personality traits in acquiring leadership skills is not recognized well. The aim of the study was determining whether perfectionism may be treated as a mediator between the feeling of one’s own efficacy, and authentic leadership skills in students of nursing.Methods: The group of people studied consisted of 615 students of nursing (Women = 96.3%, n=592; Men = 3.7%, n=23), who made up 67.51 % all students of the discipline. The following research tools were used: Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES).Results: The level of perfectionism is a significant mediator of relations between self-efficacy (GSES) and the level of authentic leadership (Sobel Test: t = 6.958; p = 0.000). The relation, without a mediating factor, is positive, and standardized beta coefficient for the feeling of own efficacy totals beta = 0.470 (p = 0.000), while in the presence of a mediator the strength of the correlation is smaller and amounts to beta = 0.366 (p = 0.000).Conclusions: Taking into account personal variables (perfectionism and self-efficacy) in the process of shaping skills is of key importance. In order to increase the efficacy, the programs of teaching these skills should include mutual relation between perfectionism and self-efficacy.

At-Risk Boys’ Social Self-Efficacy and Physical Activity Self-Efficacy in a Summer Sports Camp

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Su ◽  
Ping Xiang ◽  
Ron E. McBride ◽  
Jiling Liu ◽  
Michael A. Thornton
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Prosocial Behaviors ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Social Self ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Summer Sports Camp

This study examined at-risk boys’ social self-efficacy and physical activity self-efficacy within Bandura’s self-efficacy framework. A total of 97 boys, aged between 10 and 13 years, attending a summer sports camp completed questionnaires assessing their social self-efficacy, physical activity self-efficacy, prosocial behaviors, and effort. Results indicated that social self-efficacy and physical activity self-efficacy were clearly distinguishable. However, the two constructs had a strong positive correlation. Both social self-efficacy and physical activity self-efficacy predicted prosocial behaviors significantly, with social self-efficacy having a stronger predictive power. Physical activity self-efficacy was a better predictor of effort than social self-efficacy. This study provides initial empirical evidence supporting Bandura’s conceptualization of the domain-specific features and predictive power of self-efficacy in a summer sports camp setting, and thus enables a better understanding of the nature and effects of self-efficacy.

Association between the Five Factor personality traits and perceived stress: is the effect mediated by general self-efficacy?

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Frost Ebstrup ◽  
Lene Falgaard Eplov ◽  
Charlotta Pisinger ◽  
Torben Jørgensen
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
General Self Efficacy

Effects of Yoga on Psychological Health in Older Adults

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1334-1341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberlee Bethany Bonura ◽  
Gershon Tenenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Psychological Health ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Control ◽  
And Control ◽  
General Self Efficacy

Background:The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a yoga intervention on psychological health in older adults.Method:A randomized controlled trial study, conducted at 2 North Florida facilities for older adults. Subjects were 98 older adults, ages 65 to 92. Participants were randomly assigned to chair yoga, chair exercise, and control groups and assessed preintervention, postintervention, and 1-month follow-up on the State Anger Expression Inventory, State Anxiety Inventory, Geriatric Depression Scale, Lawton’s PGC Morale Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales, and Self- Control Schedule.Results:Yoga participants improved more than both exercise and control participants in anger (Cohen’s d = 0.89 for yoga versus exercise, and 0.90 for yoga versus control, pretest to posttest; and d = 0.90 and 0.72, pretest to follow-up), anxiety (d = 0.27, 0.39 and 0.62, 0.63), depression (d = 0.47, 0.49 and 0.53, 0.51), well-being (d = 0.14, 0.49 and 0.25, 0.61), general self-efficacy (d = 0.63, 1.10 and 0.30, 0.85), and self-efficacy for daily living (d = 0.52, 0.81 and 0.27, 0.42). Changes in self-control moderated changes in psychological health.Conclusions:Over a 6-week period, our findings indicate yoga’s potential for improving psychological health in older adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document