scholarly journals Demokrasi Sebagai Pola Hidup Menurut John Dewey

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
C.B Mulyatno

Abstract: John Dewey expresses repeatedly that the significance of democracy is more than political discourse. He invites us to realize that democracy is primarily moral idea that animates a process of living and should be actualized continuously. He underlines that the idea of liberty, equality and fraternity, which is the democratic trinity, is ethical ideal of humanity in which personality is at the centre of reflection. Every human individual is free to actualize its self-realization. His liberty is based on the belief that every human individual has a right to equal opportunity with every other person to develop whatever endowment he has. Then, democracy indicates fraternity as an ethical value, which every human individual is able to actualize his capacities only in actively cooperative relationship with other. Political and social democracy presenting in a real association of life will be effectively sustained if its values of ideal hu-manity becomes an animating force of life. In other words, he envisions that democracy becomes a personal way of life.  Keywords: values of democracy, social responsibility, culture of democracy,  transformation of life, peaceful life.   Absrak: John Dewey menyatakan berulangkali bahwa demokrasi lebih dari sekedar persoalan politik. Ia menunjukkan bahwa demokrasi pertama-tama merupakan sebuah gagasan etis yang menjiwai proses hidup secara terus-menerus. Kebebasan, kesederajatan, dan persaudaraan yang menjadi inti demokrasi merupakan nilai-nilai etis kemanusiaan yang menjadi arah hidup manusia di dalam kehidupan bersama di tengah masyarakat. Setiap individu adalah bebas untuk mewujudkan dirinya. Kebebasannya didasarkan pada keyakinan bahwa setiap individu mempunyai hak dan kesempatan yang sama untuk mengembangkan diri sesuai dengan potensi yang dianugerahkan kepadanya. Persaudaraan merupakan nilai etis yang menegaskan bahwa setiap individu hanya mampu mewujudkan diri di dalam relasi dan kerjasama dengan sesamanya. Ketiga nilai etis tersebut seharusnya menjiwai tata hidup bersama. Dengan kata lain, demokrasi seharusnya menjadi pola hidup setiap pribadi sebagai anggota masyarakat. Kata-kata Kunci: nilai-nilai demokrasi, tanggung jawab sosial, budaya demo-krasi, transformasi hidup, hidup damai.

2019 ◽  
pp. 38-59
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Stitzlein

This chapter explains that hope is not something that one merely holds or asserts, but rather is a way of life. This chapter focuses in on the unique pragmatist view of habits as proclivities and predispositions to act. Drawing on the work of philosopher John Dewey, this chapter explains how habits are formed and nurtured as well as changed through inquiry and reflection. It argues that hope is best understood as a set of habits that predispose citizens toward possibility and change for the betterment of each citizen and, often, others. The chapter explains how this understanding of hope is more deeply social and political than the individualist notions typically used. By linking citizens in action to each other, hope as habits chart new paths for reviving democracy, in part by building trust and agency among citizens. The chapter closes out by noting some of the benefits and shortcomings of a pragmatist account of political hope, some of which are most pronounced in the struggles of citizens of color.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-345
Author(s):  
Amrita Bharadwaj ◽  
Divyangna Singh

Tata Steel is an equal opportunity employer where diversity & inclusion (D&I) is not a choice but a way of life. Our vision is to make Tata Steel a world class equal opportunity employer where everyone is respected, every voice is heard. We are proud to feature amongst the IWEI 2020 Top Employers for LGBTQ+ inclusion. This recognition reaffirms our commitment to foster a culture of allyship to actively promote LGBTQ+ empowerment and build a benchmark workplace. We have been working relentlessly towards curating a workplace where people can bring their authentic selves to work through structured interventions around LGBTQ+ representation, policies and infrastructure, proactive allyship and community engagement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-62
Author(s):  
William O’Meara

Much moral speculation has been devoted to the problem, of equating personal happiness and regard for the general good, note John Dewey and Tufts. If I do what is morally right for justice and benevolence, will I necessarily be happy or rewarded with happiness? In fact, some very bad people are happy, and some very good people suffer terribly. The problem thus put seems insoluble in this life and soluble only in the next life in which the bad will be punished and the good will be rewarded. However, Dewey and Tufts argue: “‘the problem is insoluble because it is artificial.’” The argument of Dewey is not that morality is to be viewed as a means to an external end of happiness whether in this life or in a life after death but that morality involves a profound transformation of the self in an ongoing process that aims to transform the self so that one is a fit member of the developing moral community that all moral agents may seek even if one were to die in being true to the moral transformation of the self and of the community. This paper will support Dewey’s argument by a consideration of the way Socrates confronts his death as interpreted by Plato especially in The Apology which is agnostic about the immortality of the soul rather than in The Phaedo which affirms the immortality of the soul. For the dying of Socrates for the central moral value of his life, the examined way of life, is not unique as a moral decision. On the contrary, it is a moral decision that exemplifies what should be going on in moral decisions all the time, that is, precisely the subordination of earlier felt desires and impulses and social roles from babyhood and childhood to the highest moral ideals of the examined way of life and the life of mutual respect in the virtues which Dewey does not, of course, grasp as eternal Platonic forms of moral values. Socrates has always subordinated his life of sensation and emotion to the more lasting values of morality, and he is more deeply happy in finding his self-realization in striving to realize something greater than himself, the ongoing, social self involved in the moral community of self-examination and of virtue than in merely continuing to live.


2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-92
Author(s):  
Eva Angerler ◽  
Barbara Liegl

This article deals with the political discourse on corporate social responsibility in Austria and presents two organisations that represent social partner organisations and NGOs promoting CSR, although they focus on different topics and elements of CSR. Standardisation, transparency and credibility are important aspects in a broad range of CSR initiatives. Codes of corporate governance are cited as an example of the problems faced when introducing voluntary instruments in the CSR context. Although many different organisations are participating in the CSR debate and have launched various initiatives, companies have not implemented holistic CSR measures aiming at sustainable development to a significant degree.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jón Ólafsson

John Dewey famously argued that we should think of democracy as a “way of life”. What this consists in he described as participating according to capacity in public decisions and participating according to need or desire in forming values. He also characterized democracy as “a mode of associated living, of conjoint communicated experience” (Dewey 1966 p. 87; 1954 p. 147; 1957 p. 209). Such and other passages in Dewey’s works show that his conception of democracy is complex. He did not think of it simply as a way of decision-making, nor is democratic procedure of particular importance to him. Concepts such as “associated living” or “communicated experience” point to the social dimensions Dewey was particularly interested in. Dewey also repeatedly claims that democracy demands “social return” from every individual and that democracy enables everyone to develop “distinct capacities” (Dewey 1966, p. 122). A related claim emphasizes how, in a democracy, “all share in useful service and enjoy a worthy leisure” (Dewey 1966, p. 256).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document