PROGRESSIVE INCOME TAXATION: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
E. A. LEPESHKINA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Important Change ◽  
Research Topic ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Progressive Income Taxation

The relevance of the research topic is due to the fact that in 2021 there was an important change in wages-the introduction of a progressive personal income tax rate. This system of income taxation is just be-ginning to be implemented and, of course, will be subject to further changes. The state has an important task to carry out this process consistently, taking into account the peculiarities of the country and relying on the successful experience of developed countries. The article reveals the concepts of progressive and propor-tional taxation, considers the views of supporters of these types of taxation systems, examines foreign expe-rience in applying the progressive personal income tax rate, and makes suggestions for improving the existing system.

scholarly journals Evaluation the impact of the personal income tax reform in the Czech Republic in 2021 on effective tax rate and tax progressivity

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-145
Author(s):  
M. Krajňák ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Tax Reform ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Effective Tax Rate ◽  
Tax Base ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Tax Progressivity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Income Tax Reform

Legislation governing personal income taxation is often subject to changes. A significant personal income tax reform was carried out in the Czech Republic in 2021. The reform implements a progressive tax rate, changes the way the tax base is determined, and increases the tax relief for the taxpayer. The aim of the article is to evaluate the impact of the personal income tax reform on the effective tax rate and tax progressivity. To that end, methods of regression analysis have been used. The source of information for analysis was the data published by the Czech Statistical Office. It was found that in 2021, in comparison with 2020, the tax burden represented in this study by the effective tax rate, in all cases became lower, approximately by 5%. The main reason for this decline is the adjustment of the method of construction of the tax base, which, for the first time in the history of the Income Tax Act, is gross wages. Until the end of 2020, the tax base was a super-gross wage, or the gross wage increased by social security contribution borne by the employer at his costs. The second factor that reduces the tax burden is a CZK 3,000 increase in the deduction per taxpayer per year. This fact increases the degree of tax progressivity, as confirmed by the results of the progressivity analysis and the regression analysis. The changes that have taken place in the personal income tax this year have a positive impact on the taxpayer, but from the point of view of the state, this reform has reduced the state budget revenues.

scholarly journals Can Tax Incentives for Electronic Payments Curtail the Shadow Economy? Korea`s Attempt to Reduce Underreporting in Retail Businesses

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-134
Author(s):  
Sung Myung Jae ◽  
Awasthi Rajul ◽  
Lee Hyung Chul
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Shadow Economy ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Tax Incentives ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Gini Coefficients ◽  
Korean Economy ◽  
Business Income

Increasing tax revenues by curtailing the shadow economy has been a central goal of tax policy and administration in the Republic of Korea since the National Tax Service was established as an independent agency in 1966. This paper examines the Tax Incentives for Electronically Traceable Payments (TIETP) introduced by the Korean tax authorities in 1999 to promote payments made using credit cards, debit cards, and electronic cash receipts in business-to-consumer transactions. TIETP allows wage and salary earners to claim tax deductions for eligible purchases made using electronically traceable payments when they file their year-end income tax return. This tax incentive scheme has greatly contributed to transforming the Korean economy into a cashless economy over the last decade and a half. Card payments as a ratio of Korea`s GDP have ranked highest in the world since 2005, reaching 49% in 2014. TIETP has increased the percentage of business income earners who pay taxes from stagnant at around 30% up to the late 1990s to approximately 80% at present. The effective personal income tax rate for business income followed a continuous upward trend from 3.4% in 1998 to 6.3% in 2013. The total revenue increase driven by TIETP has been estimated as \3.4 trillion, with TIETP costs reaching \1.9 trillion. The net gain is an estimated \1.4 trillion (approximately US$1.3 billion), an increase of personal income tax revenue by 4.2%. TIETP also had a positive impact on income redistribution, decreasing Gini coefficients by 0.11 percentage points.

scholarly journals Income taxation of self-employed attorney and peculiarities of single social contribution payment

1970 ◽  
pp. 112-116
Author(s):  
Olena Hedziuk
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Tax Law ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Social Contribution

 The paper is designed to present the legal regulation of income taxation of self-employed attorney. For tax purposes, the attorney who carries out the activity is an individually self-employed person, namely, a person who pursues an independent professional activity.      An individual who intends to pursue independent professional activity is obliged to register with the supervisory authorities at their place of residence as self-employed persons. If a person is registered as an entrepreneur and at the same time this person carries out an independent professional activity, such an individual is accounted for the controlling bodies as an entrepreneur with a sign of pursuing the independent professional activity.       Income received during the calendar year from conducting independent professional activity is taxed on the personal income tax at the rate of 18%. Taxable income is the cumulative net income, that is the difference between the income and the documented expenses required to pursue a certain type of independent professional activity. Individuals engaged in an independent professional activity are obliged to keep records of income and expenses from such activity.       In addition to the personal income tax, attorneys also pay a military levy and a single social contribution.      Discussion issues in the enforcement of tax law were distinguished: the issue of taking into account expenses in determining taxable income for taxation of income received by an attorney, as well as problem of payment of the single social contribution in the case of combining business activity and independent professional activity. In this situation, the tax authorities believe that the taxpayer must pay a single social contribution twice as an entrepreneur and as a person who provides independent professional activity. Courts often support taxpayers and confirm that a person should only pay a single social contribution as an entrepreneur. Tax authorities’ explanations remain unchanged.     To avoid double taxation and to ensure the implementation of the principles of tax law, in our opinion, this issue needs attention from the tax authorities and an up-to-date analysis tax legislation.

scholarly journals EUROPEAN PRIORITIES FOR PERSONAL INCOME TAXATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 77-87
Author(s):  
Fedir TKACHYK ◽  
Victoriia OSTAPCHUK
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Social Aspects ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Important Place ◽  
Personal Income Taxation

Introduction. In the current conditions of globalization of socio-economic development and formation of a new financial civilization, social aspects of tax policy take a important place. The system of taxation of income of citizens in Ukraine today is not fully coping with the performance of their functions. The experience of developed European countries on the formation of an effective mechanism of taxation of personal income will contribute to the establishment of the newest social and fiscal-oriented paradigm of taxation of citizens in Ukraine. The increased interest in the procedures for administering the personal income tax is also explained by the fact that this tax is one of the main sources of income to the budget of Ukraine. The purpose is to determine the peculiarities of taxation of personal income tax in Ukraine, to find out the common and different features tax system in Ukraine and European countries, to systematize recommendations on improving the mechanism of taxation of personal income. Results. The international typology of personal income tax systems is given. The general features of personal income taxation and mechanisms of application of personal income tax rates in some countries of the European Union are considered. It is argued that the implementation of the European tax experience will facilitate a faster transition to a new and effective system of personal income taxation in Ukraine. To improve personal income taxation in Ukraine, it is necessary to revise personal income tax rates, increase the amount of tax-free minimum incomes, ensure the full functioning of electronic declaration of personal incomes, optimize concessional policies, increase tax literacy and tax culture. Prospects. Further research will focus on the social aspects of taxing citizens' income in terms of differentiation of tax rates, the logic of using preferences in taxing personal income, the introduction of an effective threshold of the non-taxable minimum income, promoting the right to tax rebates, etc.

scholarly journals Personal Income Taxation in Poland

Ekonomika ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edyta Małecka-Zieńska
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Tax Exemptions ◽  
Tax Deductions ◽  
The One ◽  
Taxation System

The Polish taxation system has been undergoing substantial changes in recent years, aimed at creating a more transparent system and conforming to the taxation standards of market economy countries. The two most important changes were introduction of the personal income tax (PIT) in 1992 and replacement of the turnover tax with the value added tax (VAT) in 1993. The uniform personal income tax covered all incomes generated by natural persons irrespective of where the sources of income are located. The reform provided also a more equitable distribution of the tax burden by introducing a progressive system with three nominal tax rates (in 1992-20%, 30%, 40%).A comparative study of the effective PIT rate for pensioners and other groups of PIT payers is the main goal of this paper. The study refers to our own research on data received from The information of Polish Ministry of Finance about accounting of PIT in several subsequent years. Statistics cover a period from 1993 to 2003. However, numbers of taxpayers refer also to year 1992 when the PIT has been established and a period from 2004 to 2006.Concluding the situation in Poland, taxpayers with the highest income make exhaustive use of tax reductions. There are occurring situations when well-off people benefit more than people with relatively minor income (e. g. pensioners). It happens even if most of deductions were aimed generally at all taxpayers. Such a situation reduces the impression of the system fairness. Because tax deductions reduce budgetary revenues, the foregone revenues have to be compensated by other taxes or / and higher rates. Therefore, the system of deductions and relief, on the one hand, supports the special gains (e. g. house building), however, on the other it generates costs. It is possible that the reduction of tax rate for the I tax bracket and removal of some tax exemptions and deductions would make the Polish personal income tax more transparent, equal and simple.

scholarly journals Penyesuaian Lapisan dan Tarif PPh Orang Pribadi: Agresif atau Progresif?

Owner ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 709-721
Author(s):  
Kalyana Mitta Kristanti
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Tax Harmonization ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government

In 2022, Indonesia would apply changes in tax brackets and rates for personal income tax. This adjustment is based on the Article 17 Paragraph 1 Tax Harmonization Law Number 7 of 2021. The government tries to accommodate the needs of the community through formulating process of this regulation. In particular, it provides convenience to the lower-middle income community and encourages an even distribution of income. People belonging to the high wealth income will be subject to the highest tariffs that have just been set through this law. Through a qualitative descriptive method in which data collection is carried out by taking from literature review; law, articles, books, and website, the author tries to analyze changes in brackets and rates of personal income tax. This study presents illustrations of the calculation to explain the difference in the amount of income tax payable before and after the implementation of the Tax Harmonization Law. In addition, the analysis of the principles of equity and democracy on the adjustment of layers and tax rates is elaborated in this paper. The results obtained explain that with the application of the new tax rate, taxpayers get a tax burden relief because the tax expense is lower due to the broadening of income range. However, wealthy taxpayers will pay more taxes because of the higher tax rates. This condition proves that the new tax rate supports vertical fairness in the taxation system. In addition, the implementation of regulations related to tax rates adjustment provides evidence that the implementation of democracy has been implemented. The adjustment of tax brackets and rates has a positive impact on the community and the government so that the allocation of tax revenues can run optimally to support the welfare of the community.

scholarly journals FISCAL AND SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF PERSONAL INCOME TAXATION

2021 ◽  
pp. 163-173
Author(s):  
Volodymyr UHRYN
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Social Aspect ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
State Budgets ◽  
Fiscal Efficiency ◽  
Personal Income Taxation

Introduction. Direct taxes are an important financial regulator of socio-economic processes, they are one of the most important sources of budgeting and an essential tool of state regulation. The personal income tax is the main tax through which social policy is implemented in the developed countries of the world. The advantages of this tax include its social justice and fiscal efficiency, as it is able to make the level of taxation directly dependent on the amount of income of taxpayers. In addition, progressive tax rates and benefits can reduce the tax burden on the poor and increase it on high-income earners. The purpose of the article is to considerate the theoretical and practical aspects of administration of the personal income tax in the conditions of reforming of fiscal policy of Ukraine, systematization of directions of improvement of collecting of the personal income tax to local and state budgets. Methods. Methods of dialectical analysis and synthesis, deduction, induction logical generalization, comparison and formalization are used in the article. Results. The article is devoted to the study of the essence and role of personal income tax administration. Peculiarities of citizens’ income formation as an object of taxation are considered. Monitoring and analysis of indicators of personal income tax to local and state budgets was carried out. The growth rates of nominal revenues of personal income tax and military duty, real and nominal wages are studied. It was found that the main factors reducing the level of fiscal efficiency of personal income tax in Ukraine are the shadowing of incomes and the outflow of labor, including skilled personnel. Ukraine’s tax policy for the last five years is fiscally oriented and does not take into account the social aspect of personal income taxation. As a result of the research, the directions of increasing the efficiency of personal income taxation in Ukraine based on foreign experience are systematized. Prospects. The current model of personal income tax does not sufficiently perform a socioeconomic function, does not provide a socially equitable distribution of income between different segments of the population. In recent years, the fiscal significance of the personal income tax has remained, but the system of personal income taxation requires the application of progressive rates. Therefore, promising areas of future research should be the development and improvement of the mechanism of personal income taxation in the context of ensuring their socio-economic interests.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document