scholarly journals Comparative Study of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Trauma at CMS-TH

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Subash Thapa ◽  
Madan Thapa
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

Introduction: This study was conducted to compare the role of USG and CT as noninvasive imaging techniques for assessing the patient with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was performed at the College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Chitwan in the department of Radiodiagnosis, from January 2011 through July 2013. Where 150 patients following abdominal injuries were recorded, including patient age group, sex and mode of injury. Patient underwent USG and CT evaluation. The role of USG and CT was compared in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. Results: In our study, 80% of patient with blunt abdominal injury were male with the M:F ratio of 4:1. Road traffic accident was the most common cause of blunt abdominal trauma (72%). There were 95 (92.22%) patients positive for free fluid by USG and CT where 15 had no organ injury. CT revealed organ injuries in 88 (85.43%) patients whereas USG detected 72 (69.90%) organ injuries. Spleen 42 (47.72%) was the most common organ to be injured followed by liver29 (32.95%), kidney 7 (7.9%) and pancreas 3 (3.4%). 16 (18.18%) patients out of 88 positive for organ injuries were not associated with free fluid. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of USG for organ injury were 81.81%, 100%, 100%, 79.48% and 89.3% respectively. Conclusions: USG and CT are useful noninvasive tools in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid and organ injuries in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. CT is superior to detect organ injuries in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

scholarly journals Management of solid organ injury in patient of blunt abdominal trauma

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2361
Author(s):  
Aafrin S. Baldiwala ◽  
Vipul C. Lad
Keyword(s):  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Initial Resuscitation

Background: In this ongoing era of 21st century, trauma is the leading cause of death in individuals between age 1 and 44. In trauma, also road traffic accidents (RTAs) are the major cause of death. Blunt abdominal trauma is a frequent emergency and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.Methods: A prospective analysis of 50 patients of blunt abdominal trauma admitted in SMIMER hospital Surat within a span of 12 months was done. Unstable patients with initial resuscitation underwent focused assessment sonography for trauma (FAST). Failed resuscitation with free fluid in abdomen confirmed by FAST immediately shifted to operation theatre for laparotomy and proceed. Hemodynamically stable patients underwent computerized tomography of abdomen.Results: Most of the patients in our study were in the age group of 21-45 years with M:F ratio of 4:1. RTAs (62%) was the most common mechanism of injury. Spleen (38%) was the commonest organ injured and the most common surgery performed was splenectomy. In total non-operative management (NOM) was done in 58% of cases and surgical management was done in 42% of cases.Conclusions: Appropriate patient selection, early diagnosis and repeated clinical examination and use of appropriate investigations forms the key in management of blunt abdominal trauma. To conclude, initial resuscitation measures and correct diagnosis forms the most vital part of blunt abdominal trauma management.

scholarly journals Role of Liver Enzymes in Patients with Blunt Abdominal Trauma to Diagnose Liver Injury

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anup Shrestha ◽  
Harish Chandra Neupane ◽  
Kishor Kumar Tamrakar ◽  
Abhishek Bhattarai ◽  
Gaurav Katwal
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Liver Enzymes ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background:The liver is the second most injured organ following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) after spleen. Although the computed tomography (CT) scan is considered as the gold standard for diagnosing liver injury in BAT, it is not readily available in the hospital. This study was performed to evaluate the role of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) in patients with BAT and its significance in predicting the diagnosis and severity of the liver injury.Method:The study was conducted in Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital (CMCTH) study from February 2019 to May 2020. During that period 96 patients with BAT presented to the emergency department(ED) of CMCTH.Results:Among the 96 patients admitted with BAT, 38 patients had liver injury and 58 patients had no liver injury. The median length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay of patients with liver injury was higher than without liver injury. There was a significant difference in the median level of AST and ALT (<0.001) between patients with liver injury and no liver injury. The area under the ROC curve of AST was 0.89(95% Confidence Interval 0.86-0.98) and of ALT was 0.92(95% Confidence Interval 0.83-0.97). The area under the curve demonstrated that the test was a good predictor for the identification of liver injury and also the severity of liver enzymes. The cut-off values for the liver injury were 106 U/l and 80 U/l for AST and ALT respectively. Based on these values, AST ≥ 106 U/l had a sensitivity of 71.7 %, a specificity of 90 %, a positive predictive value of 86.8 %, and a negative predictive value of 77.6 %. The corresponding values for ALT ≥ 80 U/l were 77.8 %, 94.1%, 92.1% and 82.8 %, respectively.ConclusionIn conclusion, we report the optimal cut-off value of AST and ALT for liver injury in BAT as ≥ 106 U/l and 80 U/l respectively. The elevated level of AST and ALT might assist the surgeons to timely refer the suspected patients with the liver to a tertiary center and it might help the surgeons to go for conservative management for minor liver injuries in BAT preventing the exposure hazards of the CT scan.

Intra-abdominal Free Fluid without Solid Organ Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: An Indication for Laparotomy

2002 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1134-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander K. T. Ng ◽  
Richard K. Simons ◽  
William C. Torreggiani ◽  
Stephen G. F. Ho ◽  
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Solid Organ Injury

scholarly journals Epidemiology and injury pattern in blunt trauma abdomen in pediatric population: a two-year experience in a tertiary care institute of Kashmir, India

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 3713
Author(s):  
Arshid Iqbal Qadri ◽  
Younis Ahmad ◽  
Gowhar Aziz Bhat ◽  
Aamir A. Khan ◽  
Khalid Bashir
Keyword(s):  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Injury Pattern ◽  
Trauma Patients

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is a frequent cause for presentation of children to the Emergency Department. Children are prone to sustain injuries to intra-abdominal organs after blunt abdominal trauma because of their peculiar body habitus and relatively immature musculoskeletal system. Objectives of this study is to assess the various epidemiological parameters that influences the causation of trauma as well as injury pattern in blunt trauma abdomen in pediatric population.Methods: The present observational hospital based prospective study was carried out in 96 blunt abdominal trauma patients of both sexes aged up to 12 years, over a period of 2 years. The parameters such as age group, sex, mode of trauma, type of injury, and the overall mortality as well as mortality were assessed.Results: The most common mode of injury was road traffic accidents (54.2%) followed by fall from height (41.70%). Splenic injury was the most common in 58.30%, followed by hepatic injuries 34.40% and renal injuries 12.50 %. The accuracy of ultrasonography (USG) was 83.33% while accuracy of computed tomography (CECT) as a diagnostic test was 93.33%. When comparing USG findings with operative findings sensitivity of USG was 88% with positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.66% while as specificity was 60% with negative predictive value (NPV) of 50%. Sensitivity of CT scan was 96.00% with PPV of 96.00% and specificity of CECT scan was 80.00% with NPV of 80.00%.Conclusions: The majority of pediatric injuries are preventable by knowing the epidemiology and pattern of pediatric trauma.

Significance of Computed Tomography Finding of Intra-Abdominal Free Fluid Without Solid Organ Injury after Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Time for Laparotomy on Demand

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1411-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Mahmood ◽  
Zainab Tawfek ◽  
Yassir Abdelrahman ◽  
Tariq Siddiuqqi ◽  
Husham Abdelrahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Solid Organ Injury ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Tomography Finding

scholarly journals Isolated gallbladder perforation in paediatric blunt abdominal injury: A case report and review of literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Sujoy Neogi ◽  
Arka Banerjee ◽  
Shasanka S Panda ◽  
Simmi K Ratan
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Diagnostic Laparoscopy ◽  
Road Accident ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Gallbladder Perforation ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Injury

Gallbladder injury in blunt abdominal trauma is rare, around 2% of all abdominal traumas. Vague symptoms and inconclusive imaging make it an elusive diagnosis, more so in children. Only 30 pediatric cases have been reported worldwide till date. We report a case of a 7yrs old boy presenting 2 weeks after a road accident with a gallbladder rupture which was eventually discovered on a diagnostic laparoscopy. This is the second such case being reported from India. The injury is most often identified at exploration and although cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment, there are occasions when the gallbladder may be left in situ. The classification system of Losanoff and Kjossev has merit in guiding treatment. The various presentations, mechanisms and modes of injury have been highlighted along with the clinical and imaging findings. Despite the developments in modern radiology, identifying gallbladder perforation has always been difficult because of the rarity of the condition. In a child with blunt abdominal trauma and intra-abdominal free fluid without any solid organ injury, a diagnostic peritoneal tap may be helpful. Based on the current evidence, we advocate a low threshold for performing a diagnostic laparoscopy in all such cases.

scholarly journals No need for surgery? Patterns and outcomes of blunt abdominal trauma

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-107
Author(s):  
Maximilian Goedecke ◽  
Florian Kühn ◽  
Ioannis Stratos ◽  
Robin Vasan ◽  
Annette Pertschy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Intestinal Perforation ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Severity Of Injury

AbstractIntroductionThe management of a patient suffering from blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) remains a challenge for the emergency physician. Within the last few years, the standard therapy for hemodynamically stable patients with BAT has transitioned to a non-operative approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of patients with BAT and to determine the reasons for failure of non-operative management (NOM).Materials and methodsAnalysis of 176 consecutive patients treated for BAT was conducted in a German level 1 trauma center from 2004 to 2011. Abdominal injuries were classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). Patients included were demonstrated to have objective abdominal trauma with either free fluid on focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) or computed tomography (CT), or proven organ injury.ResultsPatients, 142 of 176 (80.7%), with BAT were initially managed non-operatively, with a success rate of 90%. The rates of NOM success were higher among those with less severe injuries; 100% with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of 1. In total, 125 patients (71.0%) were managed non-operatively, and 51 (29.0%) required surgical intervention. NOM failure occurred in 9.2% of the patients, the most common reason being initially undiagnosed intestinal perforation (46.2%). Positive correlation was identified (r = 0.512; p < 0.001) between the ISS (injury severity score) and the NACA (National Advisory Committee of Aeronautics) score. The delay in operation in NOM failure was 6 h in patients with underlying hepatic or splenic rupture and 34 h with intestinal perforation. The overall mortality of 5.1% was attributed especially to old age (p = 0.016), high severity of injury (p < 0.001), and greater need for blood transfusion (p < 0.001).ConclusionNOM was successful for the vast majority of blunt abdominal trauma patients, especially those with less severe injuries. NOM failure and operative delay were most commonly due to occult hollow viscus injury (HVI), the detection of which was achieved by close clinical observation and abdominal ultrasound in conjunction with monitoring for rising markers of infection and by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) if additionally indicated. Based on this concept, the delay in operation in patients with NOM failure was short. This study underscores the feasibility and benefit of NOM in BAT.

scholarly journals Role of Liver Enzymes in Patients with Blunt Abdominal Trauma to Diagnose Liver Injury

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anup Shrestha ◽  
Harish Chandra Neupane ◽  
Kishor Kumar Tamrakar ◽  
Abhishek Bhattarai ◽  
Gaurav Katwal
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Liver Enzymes ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background:The liver is the second most injured organ following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) after spleen. Although the computed tomography (CT) scan is considered as the gold standard for diagnosing liver injury in BAT, it is not readily available in the hospital. This study was performed to evaluate the role of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) in patients with BAT and its significance in predicting the diagnosis and severity of the liver injury.Method:The study was conducted in Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital (CMCTH) study from February 2019 to May 2020. It was a prospective observational study. All the patients with BAT were received by on duty surgical residents in the Emergency Department. Based on the imaging and operative finding patients with liver injury and without liver injury were noted with the associated injury. For comparisons of clinical and grading characteristics between the two groups (liver injury and no liver injury). The Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables as appropriate, and Mann-Whitney U test used for quantitative variables (AST and ALT). The comparisons between more than two groups (grade of injury) were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to calculate the optimal cut-off value of AST and ALT.Results:Among the 96 patients admitted with BAT, 38 patients had liver injury and 58 patients had no liver injury. The median length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay of patients with liver injury was higher than without liver injury. There was a significant difference in the median level of AST and ALT (<0.001) between patients with liver injury and no liver injury. The area under the ROC curve of AST was 0.89(95% Confidence Interval 0.86-0.98) and of ALT was 0.92(95% Confidence Interval 0.83-0.97). The area under the curve demonstrated that the test was a good predictor for the identification of liver injury and also the severity of liver enzymes. The cut-off values for the liver injury were 106 U/l and 80 U/l for AST and ALT respectively. Based on these values, AST ≥ 106 U/l had a sensitivity of 71.7 %, a specificity of 90 %, a positive predictive value of 86.8 %, and a negative predictive value of 77.6 %. The corresponding values for ALT ≥ 80 U/l were 77.8 %, 94.1%, 92.1% and 82.8 %, respectively.ConclusionIn conclusion, we report the optimal cut-off value of AST and ALT for liver injury in BAT as ≥ 106 U/l and 80 U/l respectively. The elevated level of AST and ALT might assist the emergency physicians and surgeons to timely refer the suspected patients with the liver to a tertiary center.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document