scholarly journals Critical weed-seed density to prevent yield loss of rice grown on paddy fields dominated by annual weeds.

2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Sago ◽  
Hirokazu Takahashi ◽  
Shigeru Takayanagi
1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Sago ◽  
Masakazu Komatsuzaki
Keyword(s):  

Weed Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaitanya P. Nath ◽  
Kali K. Hazra ◽  
Chandra S. Praharaj ◽  
Ummed Singh ◽  
Sati S. Singh ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Ichihara ◽  
Keisuke Maruyama ◽  
Masayuki Yamashita ◽  
Hitoshi Sawada ◽  
Hidehiro Inagaki ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 186-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mujeebur Rahman Khan ◽  
Faheem Ahamad

Surveys of major rice growing districts in the state of Uttar Pradesh in Northern India were conducted for 3 consecutive years during 2013 to 2015 under a government-funded major research project to determine the frequency of occurrence and disease incidence of the rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola, in rice paddy fields. More than 800 paddy fields from 88 Tehsils (divisions within a district) in 18 major rice growing districts in Uttar Pradesh were surveyed, where M. graminicola was associated with root-knot disease in rice paddy fields based on morphological and molecular characterization of juveniles and adults. The highest frequency of disease in rice fields was observed in Aligarh (44.6%), followed by Muzaffarnagar, Shahjahanpur, and Kheri Lakhimpur (29.3, 28.0, and 27.4%, respectively). Maximum disease incidence was also recorded in Aligarh (44.6%), followed by Sultanpur, Mainpuri, and Muzaffarnagar (5.7, 5.2, and 4.5, respectively). Gall index and egg mass index values (on a 0 to 10 scale) were highest in Aligarh (3.5 and 2.1, respectively), followed by Muzaffarnagar (2.6 and 2.0) and Mainpuri (2.3 and 1.8). The average soil population of M. graminicola was highest in Aligarh (3,851 ± 297 second-stage juveniles [J2]/kg of soil), followed by Muzaffarnagar (2,855 ± 602 J2/kg of soil), whereas the lowest population was recorded in Barabanki (695 ± 400 J2/kg of soil) at the time of harvesting. Relative yield losses were also determined, and the highest yield loss attributed to M. graminicola infestation was recorded in Aligarh (47%). The yield loss was linearly correlated with the soil population density of M. graminicola and disease incidence.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Walsh ◽  
Stephen B. Powles

Seed production of annual weeds persisting through cropping phases replenishes/establishes viable seed banks from which these weeds will continue to interfere with crop production. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) systems are now viewed as an effective means of interrupting this process by targeting mature weed seed, preventing seed bank inputs. However, the efficacy of these systems is directly related to the proportion of total seed production that the targeted weed species retains (seed retention) at crop maturity. This study determined the seed retention of the four dominant annual weeds of Australian cropping systems - annual ryegrass, wild radish, brome grass, and wild oat. Beginning at the first opportunity for wheat harvest and on a weekly basis for 28 d afterwards the proportion of total seed production retained above a 15 cm harvest cutting height was determined for these weed species present in wheat crops at nine locations across the Western Australian (WA) wheat-belt. Very high proportions of total seed production were retained at wheat crop maturity for annual ryegrass (85%), wild radish (99%), brome grass (77%), and wild oat (84%). Importantly, seed retention remained high for annual ryegrass and wild radish throughout the 28 d harvest period. At the end of this period, 63 and 79% of total seed production for annual ryegrass and wild radish respectively, was retained above harvest cutting height. However, seed retention for brome grass (41%) and wild oat (39%) was substantially lower after 28 d. High seed retention at crop maturity, as identified here, clearly indicates the potential for HWSC systems to reduce seed bank replenishment and diminish subsequent crop interference by the four most problematic species of Australian crops.


1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-395
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Sago ◽  
Teruo Matsuda
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Marino ◽  
P.R. Westerman ◽  
C. Pinkert ◽  
W. van der Werf

Weed Science ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. V. Hill ◽  
P. W. Santelmann

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yields were not influenced by weeds that were removed within 3 weeks after planting and each week thereafter, but a yield reduction did occur when weeds were not removed until 4 to 8 weeks after planting. Peanuts kept weed free at least 6 weeks after planting showed no yield loss due to competition from weeds emerging later. As weed competition increases, peanut seed yield, forage yield, and soil moisture content decreases.


Weed Science ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 840-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward E. Schweizer ◽  
Donald W. Lybecker ◽  
Robert L. Zimdahl

The impact of four weed management systems on weed seed reserves in soil, yearly weed problem, and production of barley, corn, pinto bean, and sugarbeet was assessed where these crops were grown in rotation for 4 consecutive years in four cropping sequences. Weeds were controlled in each crop with only conventional tillage or conventional tillage plus minimum, moderate (system 1), and intensive (system 2) levels of herbicides. Seed of annual weeds from 11 genera were identified, with barnyardgrass and redroot pigweed comprising 66 and 19%, respectively, of the initial 90 million weed seed/ha present in the upper 25 cm of the soil profile. After the fourth cropping year, overall decline in total number of weed seed in soil was 53% when averaged over four cropping sequences and four weed management systems. Over the 4-yr period, about 10 times more weeds escaped control in system 1 than in system 2; and within a crop, the fewest number of weeds escaped control annually in barley. System 2 had the highest herbicide use in each cropping sequence, the fewest weeds at harvest, and the smallest adjusted gross return over the 4-yr period in three of four cropping sequences.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Walsh ◽  
Peter Newman ◽  
Stephen Powles

The widespread evolution of multiple herbicide resistance in the most serious annual weeds infesting Australian cropping fields has forced the development of alternative, non-chemical weed control strategies, especially new techniques at grain harvest. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) systems target weed seed during commercial grain harvest operations and act to minimize fresh seed inputs to the seedbank. These systems exploit two key biological weaknesses of targeted annual weed species: seed retention at maturity and a short-lived seedbank. HWSC systems, including chaff carts, narrow windrow burning, bale direct, and the Harrington Seed Destructor, target the weed seed bearing chaff material during commercial grain harvest. The destruction of these weed seeds at or after grain harvest facilitates weed seedbank decline, and when combined with conventional herbicide use, can drive weed populations to very low levels. Very low weed populations are key to sustainability of weed control practices. Here we introduce HWSC as a new paradigm for global agriculture and discuss how these techniques have aided Australian grain cropping and their potential utility in global agriculture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document