scholarly journals Correlation between Interleukin-6 and E-Selectin as a Marker of Endothelial Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient without Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factor

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Eddya Putra Boer ◽  
Rudy Hidayat ◽  
Ika Prasetya Wijaya ◽  
Ikhwan Rinaldi

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease which has recently been recognized to manifest as not only intraarticular but also extraarticular symptoms. Cardiovascular events, presented either subclinically or clinically, were discovered more in AR patients. Atherogenic inflammatory mediator in AR including interleukin-6 (IL-6) was thought to be one of nontraditional cardiovascular risk factor contributing to increase the endothelial dysfunction biomarker such as E-Selectin. This study was purposed to determine the correlation between inflammatory mediator and endothelial dysfunction event, especially between IL-6 and E-Selectin, in RA patient without traditional cardiovascular risk factor. A cross-sectional study was performed to 40 RA patients of Rheumatology Clinic of Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Indonesia from September to November 2017. Measurement of the level of IL-6 and E-Selectin were performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Bivariate correlation analysis was performed to determine the correlation between those two biomarkers. The mean age of this study subjects was 44.9 (13.1) years and median of disease duration was 36 months. This study showed weak correlation between IL-6 and E-Selectin level, but not statistically significant.232, p=0.149). There is weak correlation between IL-6 and sE-Selectin in rheumatoid arthritis patient without traditional risk factor cardiovascular   Keywords: traditional risk factor cardiovascular, E-Selectin, interleukin-6, pro inflammatory mediator, rheumatoid arthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1400-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Mease ◽  
Christina Charles-Schoeman ◽  
Stanley Cohen ◽  
Lara Fallon ◽  
John Woolcott ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ulcerative colitis, and has been investigated in psoriasis (PsO). Routine pharmacovigilance of an ongoing, open-label, blinded-endpoint, tofacitinib RA trial (Study A3921133; NCT02092467) in patients aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor identified a higher frequency of pulmonary embolism (PE) and all-cause mortality for patients receiving tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus those receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and resulted in identification of a safety signal for tofacitinib. Here, we report the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), PE, venous thromboembolism (VTE; DVT or PE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) from the tofacitinib RA (excluding Study A3921133), PsA and PsO development programmes and observational studies. Data from an ad hoc safety analysis of Study A3921133 are reported separately within.MethodsThis post-hoc analysis used data from separate tofacitinib RA, PsO and PsA programmes. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events per 100 patient-years’ exposure) were calculated for DVT, PE, VTE and ATE, including for populations stratified by defined baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors. Observational data from the US Corrona registries (including cardiovascular risk factor stratification), IBM MarketScan research database and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were analysed.Results12 410 tofacitinib-treated patients from the development programmes (RA: n=7964; PsO: n=3663; PsA: n=783) were included. IRs (95% CI) of thromboembolic events among the all tofacitinib cohorts’ average tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily treated patients for RA, respectively, were: DVT (0.17 (0.09–0.27) and 0.15 (0.09–0.22)); PE (0.12 (0.06–0.22) and 0.13 (0.08–0.21)); ATE (0.32 (0.22–0.46) and 0.38 (0.28–0.49)). Among PsO patients, IRs were: DVT (0.06 (0.00–0.36) and 0.06 (0.02–0.15)); PE (0.13 (0.02–0.47) and 0.09 (0.04–0.19)); ATE (0.52 (0.22–1.02) and 0.22 (0.13–0.35)). Among PsA patients, IRs were: DVT (0.00 (0.00–0.28) and 0.13 (0.00–0.70)); PE (0.08 (0.00–0.43) and 0.00 (0.00–0.46)); ATE (0.31 (0.08–0.79) and 0.38 (0.08–1.11)). IRs were similar between tofacitinib doses and generally higher in patients with baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors. IRs from the overall Corrona populations and in Corrona RA patients (including tofacitinib-naïve/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-treated and tofacitinib-treated) with baseline cardiovascular risk factors were similar to IRs observed among the corresponding patients in the tofacitinib development programme. No signals of disproportionate reporting of DVT, PE or ATE with tofacitinib were identified in the FAERS database.ConclusionsDVT, PE and ATE IRs in the tofacitinib RA, PsO and PsA programmes were similar across tofacitinib doses, and generally consistent with observational data and published IRs of other treatments. As expected, IRs of thromboembolic events were elevated in patients with versus without baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors, and were broadly consistent with those observed in the Study A3921133 ad hoc safety analysis data, although the IR (95% CI) for PE was greater in patients treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in Study A3921133 (0.54 (0.32–0.87)), versus patients with baseline cardiovascular risk factors treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in the RA programme (0.24 (0.13–0.41)).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document