scholarly journals Molecular Targets and Novel Therapeutic Avenues in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Elkrief ◽  
T. Alcindor

Soft-tissue sarcoma (sts) represents a heterogeneous group of rare tumours, and a significant number of affected patients will develop metastatic disease. Outcomes in the population with metastatic disease are generally poor, especially after progression on standard chemotherapy. The advent of personalized medicine has permitted oncologists to offer targeted treatment, thus addressing the limited treatment options and poor prognosis after progression on first-line chemotherapy. In this review, we delineate the existing data and therapeutic successes with respect to existing and emerging molecular targets in sts and options for immunotherapy in sts. Our review also summarizes emerging clinical trials that are currently recruiting patients.

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9011-9011
Author(s):  
P. M. Deckert ◽  
J. M. Siehl ◽  
E. Thiel ◽  
A. Schmittel ◽  
G. Hütter ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11074-11074
Author(s):  
J. Rodriguez-Pascual ◽  
E. Garcia ◽  
F. Lopez-Rios ◽  
A. Cubillo ◽  
I. Diaz-Padilla ◽  
...  

11074 Background: Treatment options for patients (pts) with colorectal cancer (CRC) have increased in the last years. However, there are no validated prospective molecular markers in CRC to select which agents are better to treat any individual case. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of developing an implementing a biomarker panel to guide treatment selection in this setting. Methods: Colorectal cancer tumors were prospectively analyzed with a predefined set of 11 molecular targets, including: KRas and PI3K mutations, EGFR amplification (FISH), and ERCC-1, TS, TP expression by IHC. Clinical characteristics and response to chemotherapy were registered. To establish the utility of this panel, we determine as congruent-treatment if the panel predict the best treatment in patients with more of 1 chemotherapy line and no-congruent-treatment if do not. Results: A total of 84 patients were studied. Only 6 % required a repeated biopsy to obtain sufficient tumor for marker analysis. In 81 % of patients was feasible to study almost 8/11 targets. There were 29 pts (39%) with KRas mutant CRC; 3 pts with PI3K mutations (4%, all of them with KRas mutation); and 2 patients with EGFR amplification. ERCC-1 was positive in 5/78 (6.4%) and TS was positive in 47%. None of 54 pts had TP positivity. Clinical floow up was available in 66 pts (44 males, median age 59, 93% ECOG 0–1). Nineteen patients had early CRC; 23 with metastatic CRC treated with a first line chemotherapy and 24 with advanced CRC treated with 2 or more prior regimens. In this last group for whom the response to multiple agents is known, the panel predictive the most effective treatment in 14 of 24 cases. Conclusions: This targeted-therapy-panel is feasible to implement and should be explore to predict treatment response to CRC . No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23550-e23550
Author(s):  
Nail Paksoy ◽  
Izzet Dogan ◽  
Meltem Ekenel ◽  
Mert Basaran

e23550 Background: Sarcoma is a rare heterogeneous group malignancy and most commonly arises from soft tissue. The primary treatment modality is surgery. However, in metastatic disease, treatment options are limited. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred for palliative treatment. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of temozolomide in heavily pretreated soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: We evaluated the patients with a metastatic various types of soft tissue sarcoma retrospectively. The patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors and bone sarcomas were excluded from the study. We recorded the clinical, pathological, and treatment data of the patients. SPSS 25v was used for statistical analysis. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Sixteen patients were included in this study. The median age was 48 (range, 21-73) years. Six (37.5%) patients were de-novo metastatic. Tumor localizations were intra-abdominal (43.8%), extremity (31.2%), intrathoracic (12.5%), and head-and-neck (12.5%). The most common metastatic sites were lung (75%), bone (31.8%), liver (18.8%), respectively. For metastatic disease, the patients received at least two different chemotherapy regimens (75%), pazopanib (50%) and palliative radiotherapy (31.3%). Metastasectomy was also performed on five (31.3%) patients. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 (95% CI, 2.6-4.3) months. Partial response was observed in one (6.3%) patients, stable disease in four (25 %) patients. Eleven (68.8%) patients had progressive disease. Grade 1-2 adverse events were observed in nine (56.3%) patients, grade 3-4 in one (6.3%) patients. Conclusions: We showed that temozolomide was well-tolerated but had a limited efficacy for the treatment of patients with metastatic sarcoma. Treatment options for metastatic sarcomas are limited. Temozolomide may be considered a treatment option in patients with heavily pretreated soft tissue sarcoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document