Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement with Chest Wall Exit Site for Neonate with Stoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Ta ◽  
Saurabh Saxena ◽  
Faidah Badru ◽  
Ashley Sang Eun Lee ◽  
Colleen M. Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Chest Wall ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Glue Injection ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

Neonates requiring peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters have been shown to have complication rates up to 70%. The presence of a concurrent stoma significantly increases the risk of peritonitis, exit-site infection, and catheter failure. As such, multiple techniques have been proposed to reduce these risks, including a chest wall exit site. In this case, the patient was born with bilateral hypoplastic kidneys and an anorectal malformation, requiring a colostomy soon after birth. At 4 weeks of life, he required placement of a PD catheter for dialysis. Given the high risk of infection, a laparoscopic-assisted PD catheter placement with a chest wall exit remote from the colostomy was performed. This report describes the operative technique including omentectomy, placement of a percutaneous stitch between the catheter cuffs, and fibrin glue injection around the catheter. The patient had no catheter-related infections. Laparoscopic-assisted PD catheter placement with chest wall exit site is a safe alternative in patients with any type of abdominal stoma.

Modification of the percutaneous approach to peritoneal dialysis catheter placement under peritoneoscopic visualization: clinical results in 78 patients.

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
N S Nahman ◽  
D F Middendorf ◽  
W H Bay ◽  
R McElligott ◽  
S Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Seldinger Technique ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Percutaneous Approach ◽  
Tunnel Infection

The placement of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheters under direct peritoneoscopic visualization is a relatively new technique for establishing peritoneal dialysis access. In this study, in which a modification of the Seldinger technique was used to facilitate the placement of the peritoneoscope, the experience with 82 consecutive catheterization procedures in 78 patients is reported. In 2 (2.4%) of 82 catheterization procedures, we were unable to enter the peritoneal cavity but experienced no other complications unique to the percutaneous approach. Of the 80 successful catheterization procedures, 76 represented first-time catheter placement and constituted a population subjected to life-table analysis examining catheter survival rates, the time to first cutaneous exit site or s.c. tunnel infection, and the time to first episode of peritonitis. After a follow-up period of 50.1 patient yr, 11 catheters were lost because of catheter dysfunction. Other clinical complications included peritoneal fluid leaks at the cutaneous exit site in 11 instances (0.22/patient yr), cutaneous exit site infection in 7 instances (0.14/patient yr), s.c. tunnel infection in 2 instances (0.04/patient yr), and 34 episodes of peritonitis (0.68/patient yr). The results of this study demonstrate that the suggested modification of the percutaneous placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters, under peritoneoscopic visualization, is a viable method for establishing peritoneal access.

scholarly journals Selective Infracolic Omentecomy and Fixation Reduces Complications after Laparoscopic Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement

2018 ◽  
Vol I (1) ◽  
pp. 06-11
Author(s):  
Andries Ryckx
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Catheter Survival ◽  
Catheter Obstruction ◽  
Infracolic Omentectomy

Introduction Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) provides a competitive alternative to hemodialysis (HD). Long-term catheter survival remains challenging and techniques are not standardized. Advanced laparoscopic placement with fixation and omentectomy might increase catheter survival. The goal of our study was to evaluate if selective infracolic omentectomy and fixation reduced complications after CAPD catheter placement. Materials and Methods A prospective database of patients with CAPD catheter placement from March 2004 to March 2015 was analyzed. All procedures were performed laparoscopically assisted and under general anesthesia by a single surgeon. 78 patients were included, there were no exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Fisher exact test and log-rank test with calculation of P-value was executed. P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Of the 78 patients who underwent catheter placement, 53 (68%) were males and 25 (32%) were females. The mean age was 54 (ranged from 13 to 88 years). Selective infracolic omentectomy was performed in 32 patients if the momentum reached beyond the promontory. Non-resorbable sutures to fix the catheter were applied in 33 patients. The average duration of peritoneal dialysis was 21 months (range from ten days to 84 months). Omentectomy significantly reduced the incidence of catheter obstruction (3 vs. 11%, P=0.028) but not of catheter dislocation (19 vs. 30%, P=0.101). Omentectomy did not significantly increase the incidence of peritonitis (22 vs. 31%,P=0.133) or exit-site infection (16vs 17%, P=0.238). Catheter fixation with non-resorbable sutures reduced catheter dislocation (21 vs. 23%, P=0.226) and catheter obstruction( 12 vs.17%,P=0.223) with a significant reduction of peritonitis (15 vs. 29%, P=0.044) and no effect on exit-site infection (15 vs. 17%,P=0.251). Conclusion Laparoscopic PD catheter placement with selective omentectomy and fixation of the catheter to the abdominal wall is safe and feasible and leads to fewer complications. Key words: peritoneal, dialysis, catheter, complications, laparoscopy, omentectomy.

Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Left in Place after Kidney Transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 651-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saúl Pampa-Saico ◽  
Fernando Caravaca-Fontán ◽  
Víctor Burguera-Vion ◽  
Víctor Diéz Nicolás ◽  
Estefanía Yerovi-León ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection

No clear consensus has been reached regarding the optimal time to remove the peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) after kidney transplantation (KT). This retrospective observational study, conducted in a single peritoneal dialysis (PD) unit including all PD patients who received a KT between 1995 - 2015, was undertaken to evaluate the clinical outcomes and potential complications associated with a PDC left in place after KT. Of the 132 PD patients who received a KT, 20 were excluded from the study. Of the remaining, 112 (85%) patients with functioning KT were discharged with their PDC left in place and had it removed in a mean interval of 5 ± 3 months after KT, after achieving optimal graft function. During this follow-up period, 7 patients (6%) developed exit-site infection and there were 2 cases (2%) of peritonitis; all of them were successfully treated. Delayed PDC removal after KT is associated with low complication rates, although regular examination is needed so that mild infections can be detected early and therapy promptly instituted.

scholarly journals P1204PHROPHYLATIC GENTAMICIN - A THERAPEUTIC WEAPON IN THE COMBAT OF EXIT SITE INFECTIONS IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Abrantes ◽  
Francisco Ferrer ◽  
HernÂNi Ricardo Martins GonÇAlves ◽  
Ana Vila Lobos
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Chronic Glomerulonephritis ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Cardiovascular Comorbidities ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Aims Infection-related complications, such as exit-site infection (ESI) and peritonitis, are one of the main causes of technique failure and dropout in patients under peritoneal dialysis. Several studies have demonstrated the positive effect of daily topical antibiotics (AB) in preventing ESI. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the impact of topical gentamicin (TG) in preventing ESI, between 2009 and 2019, in a single-center of a medium-sized hospital in Portugal. Method Descriptive and retrospective analysis was performed. Demographic data, comorbidities, type of catheter placement and PD prescription were collected. For each patient, it was determined the time free of prophylactic AB (NTG) and under topical gentamicin (ophthalmic formula, once a day, applied on exit site). ESI cases were identify. Results Eighty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 53.2 ± 14.6 years; 69.5% were male. Cardiovascular comorbidities, like arterial hypertension and diabetes, were highly prevalent (88.2% and 76.5% respectively). Chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetes were the main causes of CKD (19; 22.4%; 15; 17.6%). More than 80% of the patients had previous Nephrology follow up. Percutaneous approach was the first option to catheter placement in 70.6% of the cases and DPA was performed in 53,0%. Every patient started the PD program free of prophylactic AB (n=85); 35 patients started TG at some point. Forty episodes of ESI were recorded, 39 (97.5%) in the NTG group. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently identified organism (16; 41.0%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermis (5; 12.5%) and Corynebacterium (5; 12.5%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients in TG were associated with better free-time of first peritonitis ((705 vs 985 days; p=0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model confirmed a 14 times higher risk of ESI in NTG group (HR 14.4; 95% CI 1.97-105.45; p=0.001). Conclusion Although mupirocin is still the first option in many centers, some studies have demonstrated a benefic role of gentamicin in reducing ESI, not only by Pseudomonas species but also Staphylococcus aureus. The results of our study confirmed that topical daily gentamicin is highly effective preventing ESI in PD patients. Despite of the concern with the gentamicin-resistant infections, just one patient developed ESI under gentamicin, and the identified microorganism was the Staphylococcus epidermidis.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional Swan-Neck Straight-Tip Catheters to Straight-Tip Catheters with An Artificial Subcutaneous Swan Neck

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiu-Leong Li ◽  
Tai-Gen Cui ◽  
Hong-Bing Gan ◽  
Kin Cheung ◽  
Weng-In Lio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Tenckhoff Catheter ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
The Difference

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inserting a straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter configured with a subcutaneous artificial swan neck. Design Clinical outcomes of conventional swan-neck straight-tip catheters and Tenckhoff straight-tip catheters implanted with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck were compared in a prospective randomized controlled trial in a single-center setting. Patients and Methods Patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion were randomized to receive either a double-cuff straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter with an artificial subcutaneous swan-neck (TC) or a conventional double-cuff straight-tip swan-neck catheter (SN). The primary outcome was catheter exit-site infection rate; the secondary outcomes were catheter-related mechanical events and surgery-related bleeding. Results A total of 39 consecutive patients were enrolled: 20 into the TC group and 19 into the SN group. More exit-site infections were observed in the SN group than in the TC group, although the difference was not statistically significant (0.97 vs 0.51 episodes per patient-year, p = 0.0657). However, there were more peritonitis episodes in the TC group than in the SN group (0.35 vs 0.15 episodes per patient-year, p = 0.0256). Exit-site and main wound bleeding post surgery were generally mild and similar in the 2 groups. No events of dialysate leakage, catheter tip migration, or subcutaneous cuff protrusion were observed in patients of either group. Outflow failure due to mechanical causes occurred in 2 patients in the TC group and in 1 patient in the SN group during the intermittent peritoneal dialysis period; all were corrected successfully by laparoscopic omentectomy. Conclusions Placement of the double-cuff straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter configured with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck appears to be an effective and safe procedure. It may be a good alternative to the conventional swan-neck catheter.

Swan Neck Presternal Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter: Five-Year Experience in Children

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislaw Warchol ◽  
Maria Roszkowska-Blaim ◽  
Maria Sieniawska
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Medical Academy ◽  
Subcutaneous Tunnel ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Observation Period

Objectives To reduce the incidence of exit-site infection (ESI) a new peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter, the Swan neck presternal catheter (SNPC), composed of abdominal and presternal parts joined by a titanium connector, with the exit site located on the chest wall, was designed. Design A prospective study was undertaken to estimate the usefulness of the SNPC for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in children. Setting University Children's Hospital, Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland. Patients From December 1991 to June 1997, 11 SNPCs were implanted in 10 children for the following reasons: recurrent ESI in 3, the presence of ureterocutaneostomies in 3, obesity in 3, the use of diapers in 2, young age in 1, and fecal incontinence in 1. More than one indication was present in some patients. In 7 patients the SNPC was the first PD catheter inserted. Intervention In all children the presternal catheter was implanted surgically by the modification of the technique described by Twardowski et al. Results The observation period ranged from 1 -60 months. The rate of ESI was 11162 patient-months. The major complication was trauma of the exit site (4 times in 3 of 10 patients). In spite of leaving an extra length of the catheter in the entire subcutaneous tunnel at the time of implantation, the two parts of the SNPC became disconnected in 2 children (after 7 and 33 months respectively). Conclusion Our results achieved with the SNPC in children are very good. The presternal catheter reduces the risk of ESI. However, the chest localization of the exit site does not help to prevent trauma in children. This type of PD catheter should be reserved for patients with specific indications.

Prospective Comparison of Downward and Lateral Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Tunnel-Tract and Exit-Site Directions

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 677-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Crabtree ◽  
Raoul J. Burchette
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Mechanical Complications ◽  
Tunnel Infection ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Lateral Tunnel

Objective Guidelines for optimal peritoneal dialysis access support both downward and lateral exit-site directions. Numerous clinical reports support the superiority of downward exit sites but none substantiate lateral configurations. Methods This prospective study compared infectious and mechanical complications between 85 catheters with a preformed arcuate bend to produce a downward exit site and 93 catheters with a straight intercuff segment configured to create a lateral exit site. Results Kaplan–Meier survivals were not different for time to first exit-site infection ( p = 0.62), tunnel infection ( p = 0.89), or peritonitis ( p = 0.38) for downward and lateral exit-site directions. Poisson regression showed no differences in rates (episodes/patient-year) of exit-site infection (0.26 vs 0.27, p = 0.86), tunnel infection (0.02 vs 0.03, p = 0.79), peritonitis (0.42 vs 0.43, p = 0.87), or catheter loss (0.06 vs 0.09, p = 0.29) for downward and lateral exit sites. Kaplan–Meier analyses of antibiotic-free intervals for exit-site ( p = 0.94) and peritonitis infections ( p = 0.72) were not different for the two groups. There was one case of catheter tip displacement with flow dysfunction in each group. There were no pericatheter hernias or spontaneous cuff extrusions. Catheter survival between groups was not different ( p = 0.20). Conclusions Catheter types employing downward and lateral tunnel-tract and exit-site configurations produce equivalent outcomes for infectious and mechanical complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document