scholarly journals Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (25) ◽  
pp. 8268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Jejunal Interposition ◽  
Proximal Gastric Cancer

Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Jejunal Interposition for Early Proximal Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lam Viet Trung ◽  
Nguyen Vo Vinh Loc ◽  
Tran Phung Dung Tien ◽  
Nguyen Lam Vuong
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Jejunal Interposition ◽  
Proximal Gastric Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy

scholarly journals Proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction or jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer: which offers better short-term surgical outcomes?

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Yan Ma ◽  
Guiting Liu ◽  
Ming Fang ◽  
Yingwei Xue
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Reflux Esophagitis ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Jejunal Interposition ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction ◽  
Upper Third ◽  
Gastric Tube Reconstruction

Abstract Objective Proximal gastrectomy acts as a function-preserving operation for upper-third gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer. Methods A retrospective review of 301 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (JI) or gastric tube (GT) at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2007 and December 2016 was performed. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Visick grade were used to evaluate postgastrectomy syndromes. Gastrointestinal fiberoscopy was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification system. Results The JI group had a longer operation time than the GT group (220 ± 52 vs 182 ± 50 min), but no significant difference in blood loss was noted. Compared to the GT group, the Visick grade and GSRS score were significantly higher. Reflux esophagitis was significantly increased in the GT group compared with the JI group. Conclusion Proximal gastrectomy is well tolerated with excellent short-term outcomes in patients with upper-third gastric cancer. Compared with GT construction, JI construction has clear functional advantages and may provide better quality of life for patients with upper-third gastric cancer.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction for upper third gastric cancer

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo-meng Xiao ◽  
Ping Zhao ◽  
Zhi Ding ◽  
Rui Xu ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Nutrition Status ◽  
Proximal Gastric Cancer ◽  
Double Tract Reconstruction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Upper Third

Abstract Background Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) has been used for upper third gastric cancer as a function-preserving procedure. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) with DTR remain uncertain. This study compared open proximal gastrectomy (OPG) with DTR and LPG with DTR for proximal gastric cancer. Methods Sixty-four patients who had undergone OPG with DTR and forty-six patients who had undergone LPG with DTR were enrolled in this case–control study. The clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes and postoperative nutrition index were analysed retrospectively. Results The operation time was significantly longer in the LGP group than in the OPG group (258.3 min vs 205.8 min; p = 0.00). However, the time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the LPG group [4.0 days vs 3.5 days (p = 0.00) and 10.6 days vs 9.2 days (p = 0.001), respectively]. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, complications or reflux oesophagitis. The nutrition status was assessed using the haemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin and weight levels from pre-operation to six months after surgery. No significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion LPG with DTR can be safely performed for proximal gastric cancer patients by experienced surgeons.

scholarly journals Reconstruction Methods and Complications of Esophagogastrostomy and Jejunal Interposition in Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nan Du ◽  
Pei Wu ◽  
Pengliang Wang ◽  
Yuwei Du ◽  
Kai Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Jejunal Interposition ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Reconstruction Methods ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Proximal gastrectomy is used for the treatment of primary gastric cancer by open or laparoscopic surgery in the upper third of the stomach. Esophagogastrostomy (EG) or jejunal interposition (JI) is widely used in various reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy. We conducted a meta-analysis of EG and JI for treatment of gastric cancer. Materials and Methods. A search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, J-STAGE, and Cochrane Library identified retrospective series on EG and JI. Weight mean differences (WMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze the operation-related data and postoperative complications. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the I2 test, and potential publication bias was assessed with Egger regression tests and sensitivity analysis. Results. Eight studies were selected, and 496 patients were included. EG group benefits were 44.81 min shorter operating time (P<0.001), 56.58 mL less blood loss (P=0.03), and 7.4 days shorter hospital stay time (P<0.001) than the JI group. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage; otherwise, the EG group had a lower risk of anastomotic stenosis (OR=0.44, 95%CI=0.20 to 0.97, P=0.04), lower risk of intestinal obstruction (OR=0.07, 95%CI=0.01 to 0.43, P=0.004), and higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR=2.47, 95%CI=1.07 to 5.72, P=0.03). Conclusion. The results of our study indicated that EG has significant advantages during the perioperative period and in short-term outcomes compared to JI.

scholarly journals Short-term and long-term comparisons of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy by the double-flap technique and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242223
Author(s):  
Tomoko Tsumura ◽  
Shinji Kuroda ◽  
Masahiko Nishizaki ◽  
Satoru Kikuchi ◽  
Yoshihiko Kakiuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Proximal Gastric Cancer ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Although proximal gastrectomy (PG) is a recognized surgical procedure for early proximal gastric cancer, total gastrectomy (TG) is sometimes selected due to concern about severe gastroesophageal reflux. Esophagogastrostomy by the double-flap technique (DFT) is an anti-reflux reconstruction after PG, and its short-term effectiveness has been reported. However, little is known about the long-term effects on nutritional status and quality of life (QOL). Methods Gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted PG (LAPG) with DFT or laparoscopy-assisted TG (LATG) between April 2011 and March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were reviewed to assess nutritional status, and the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45 was used to assess QOL. Results A total of 36 patients (LATG: 17, LAPG: 19) were enrolled. Four of 17 LATG patients (24%) were diagnosed with Stage ≥II after surgery, and half received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. BW and PNI were better maintained in LAPG than in LATG patients until 1-year follow-up. Seven of 16 LATG patients (44%) were categorized as “underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m2)” at 1-year follow-up, compared to three of 18 LAPG patients (17%; p = 0.0836). The PGSAS-45 showed no significant difference in all QOL categories except for decreased BW (p = 0.0132). Multivariate analysis showed that LATG was the only potential risk factor for severe BW loss (odds ratio: 3.03, p = 0.0722). Conclusions LAPG with DFT was superior to LATG in postoperative nutritional maintenance, and can be the first option for early proximal gastric cancer.

scholarly journals A Case of Laparoscopic Resection for Carcinoma of the Gastric Remnant following Proximal Gastrectomy Reconstructed with Jejunal Interposition

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhito Yajima ◽  
Yoshiaki Iwasaki ◽  
Ken Yuu ◽  
Ryouki Oohinata ◽  
Misato Amaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Jejunal Interposition ◽  
Gastric Remnant ◽  
Successful Case ◽  
Old Japanese ◽  
Upper Third

A 72-year-old Japanese man had a history of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach in 2007. Our usual treatment strategy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach in 2007 was open proximal gastrectomy reconstructing by jejunal interposition with a 10 cm single loop. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy for annual follow-up revealed a type 0-IIc-shaped tumor with ulcer scar, 4.0 cm in size, located in the gastric remnant near the jejunogastrostomy. A clinical diagnosis of cancer of the gastric remnant, clinical T1b(SM)N0M0, Stage IA, following the proximal gastrectomy was made and a laparoscopic approach was selected because of the cancer’s early stage. Remnant total gastrectomy with D1 plus lymphadenectomy was carried out with five ports by a pneumoperitoneal method. Complete resection of the reconstructed jejunum was undergone along with the jejunal mesentery. Reconstruction by the Roux-en-Y method via the antecolic route was selected. Total operative time was 395 min and blood loss was 40 mL. Our patient was the first successful case of resection for carcinoma of the gastric remnant following proximal gastrectomy reconstructed with jejunal interposition in a laparoscopic approach.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A comparison between the double-flap technique and jejunal interposition

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0247636
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Kumamoto ◽  
Mitsuru Sasako ◽  
Yoshinori Ishida ◽  
Yasunori Kurahashi ◽  
Hisashi Shinohara
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Body Weight Loss ◽  
Jejunal Interposition ◽  
Flap Technique

Background The optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy (PG) has been debatable. Recent reports have shown that the double-flap technique (DFT) provides good outcomes in terms of postoperative nutritional status and quality of life. However, no study has compared the clinical outcomes of the DFT with other reconstruction methods. Here, we evaluated and compared the clinical outcomes between the DFT and jejunal interposition (JI) after PG for gastric cancer. Materials and methods The medical records of 34 consecutive patients who had undergone PG for upper third gastric cancer between January 2011 and October 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The main factors investigated were surgical outcomes, postoperative nutritional status, symptoms, and endoscopic findings 1 year after surgery. Results Thirty-four patients were enrolled (DFT, 14; JI, 20). The operation time was similar between the two techniques (228 and 246 minutes for DFT and JI, respectively, P = 0.377), as were the rates of anastomotic complications (7% and 0% for DFT and JI, respectively, P = 0.412). Body weight loss was significantly lower in the DFT group than in the JI group (-8.1% vs -16.1%, P = 0.001). Total protein and albumin levels were higher in the DFT group than in the JI group (0% vs -2.9%, P = 0.053, and -0.3% vs -6.1%, P = 0.077, respectively). One patient in the DFT group and no patients in the JI group experienced reflux esophagitis (≥ grade B) (P = 0.393). Anastomotic strictures were not observed as postoperative complications in either group. Conclusions Surgical outcomes revealed that the DFT was safe and feasible, similar to JI. In terms of controlling postoperative body weight loss, the DFT is a better reconstruction technique than JI after PG.

scholarly journals Proximal Gastrectomy Is a Viable Alternative to Total Gastrectomy in Early Stage Proximal Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. e2021.00017
Author(s):  
Beth Schrope ◽  
Barbara Coons ◽  
Vilma Rosario ◽  
Sabrina Toledano
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Viable Alternative ◽  
Proximal Gastric Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document