Digital Spaces and Bi-Regional Interaction within the Paradigm of Scientific Cooperation

The authors present the results of the sea buckthorn breeding at the Institute of Horticulture (NAAS). The stages of the work have been analyzed – from studying and selecting the initial material in the conditions of the Polissya, Polissya-Lisosteppe and Lisosteppe ecotopes (2012-2016) to the successful targeted introduction to the Northern part of the Lisosteppe (2017-2019) and new forms have been characterized according to the traits valuable for economy and molec-ular genetic markers. The new forms of the researched crop taking into consideration the high indices of their productiv-ity,adaptivity to the unfavourable abiotic and biotic environmental factors and consumption quality of fruits for pro-cessing and making functionary products were entered officially into Genetic Fund of the Plants of Ukraine as con-firmed by the certificates of copyright and developed genetic passports. The list of these genotypes includes 1-15-1 (Nos-ivchanka, UA3700073), 1-15-8S (Mitsna, UA3700079), make form 1-15-6Ch (Aboryhen 6/11, UA3700080), 1-15-9 Ka-rotynna, UA3700082), 1-15-3 (Pamiatka, UA3700076), 1-15-8V (Soniachne siayvo, UA3700075), 1-15-11 (Lymonna, UA3700072), 2-15-73 (Morkviana, UA3700077), 1-15-5 (Adaptyvna, UA3700078), 1-15-8B (Osoblyva, UA3700083), 1-15-6 (Apelsynova, UA3700084) and forms 6A/11 (UA3700081), 1-15-5a (Sribnolysta 5a, UA3700074). The possibility of using 5 DNA markers to characterize genotypes of sea buckthorn bymeans of the molecular genetic markers was tested and evaluated in the framework of the scientific cooperation with the Institute of Cell Biology and Genetic Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. It should be noted that the most polymorphic markers were HrMS025 and HrMS026. However, the marker HrMS014 was monomorphic, but appeared in all the samples, so it can be used as a reference. The best forms of sea buckthorn Adaptyvna (certificate №190899) and Osoblyva (certificate №190900) were included into the State Register of Plant Varieties Suitable for dissemination in Ukraine, and the cultivars of the univer-sal use Nadiina (applications №18299010), Oliana (applications №18299009) and Morkviana (applications № 20299001) and cv pollinator Obrii (applications №18299008) undergo the State strain test. The attention is concentrat-ed on the promising directions of the new sea buckthorn genotypes for the prior breeding and genetic investigations at the Institute of Horticulture (NAAS) and its network.

Download Full-text

The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe and Other European Fora on Migration

International Migration Review ◽

10.1177/019791839402800308 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 28 (3) ◽

pp. 580-590

Author(s):

Jan Niessen

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

The United States ◽

Eastern European ◽

Scientific Cooperation ◽

High Commissioner ◽

Protection Of Human Rights ◽

Prevention Center ◽

The Many ◽

The Cold War ◽

General Secretary

In the 1970s, during the Cold War era, European and North American states began a dialogue in Helsinki which became known as the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), or the Helsinki process. For Western states the CSCE served as a platform to raise questions related to security in Europe and the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Eastern European states considered the CSCE as a means to secure the postwar borders and an opportunity to discuss economic and scientific cooperation. Today, 51 European States, plus the United States of America and Canada, participate in this process. Notwithstanding the many and often intense political tensions between the West and the East during those twenty years, quite a number of conferences, seminars and other meetings were held and a great many agreements were adopted and documents issued, dealing with matters related to CSCE's three main areas of concern: security in Europe; cooperation in the fields of economics, science, technology and environment; the promotion of human rights. In response to the fundamental changes in Europe in the late 1980s, the CSCE was given a new impetus and its operational framework was broadened. CSCE offices were established in Prague (CSCE Secretariat), Vienna (Conflict Prevention Center) and Warsaw (Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights) with the aim to strengthen and monitor compliance with CSCE commitments, especially in the area of human rights. A Parliamentary Assembly was established and met twice, first in Budapest and then in Helsinki. A General Secretary and a High Commissioner on Minorities were appointed, with offices in Vienna and The Hague, respectively.

Download Full-text

Transformed by contested digital spaces? Social media and Ukrainian diasporic ‘selves’ in the wake of the conflict with Russia

Nations and Nationalism ◽

10.1111/nana.12707 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 377-392

Author(s):

Ivan Kozachenko

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Digital Spaces

Download Full-text

Current issues in the scientific cooperation in Europe

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry ◽

10.1007/s00787-019-01383-9 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (5) ◽

pp. 733-734 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mauro Giovanni Carta

Keyword(s):

Scientific Cooperation

Download Full-text

Characterizations of simple points, simple edges and simple cliques of digital spaces: One method of topology-preserving transformations of digital spaces by deleting simple points and edges

Graphical Models ◽

10.1016/j.gmod.2010.10.002 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 73 (1) ◽

pp. 1-9 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Alexander V. Evako

Keyword(s):

Simple Points ◽

Digital Spaces

Download Full-text

NEOLITHISATION AND MEGALITHIC ORIGINS IN NORTH-WESTERN FRANCE: A REGIONAL INTERACTION MODEL

Oxford Journal of Archaeology ◽

10.1111/j.1468-0092.1994.tb00045.x ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 279-293 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

MARK PATTON

Keyword(s):

Interaction Model ◽

Regional Interaction ◽

North Western

Download Full-text

How Does Inter-Organizational Cooperation Impact Organizations’ Scientific Knowledge Generation? Evidence from the Biomass Energy Field

Sustainability ◽

10.3390/su13010191 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 191

Author(s):

Liu Li ◽

Chaoying Tang

Keyword(s):

Scientific Knowledge ◽

Biomass Energy ◽

Knowledge Generation ◽

Degree Centrality ◽

Technical Knowledge ◽

Technical Cooperation ◽

Scientific Cooperation ◽

Structural Holes ◽

Cooperation Network ◽

Positive Effect

Previous studies have demonstrated that accessing external knowledge is important for organizations’ knowledge generation. The main purpose of this study is to investigate how the diversity and amount of organizations’ external scientific knowledge influence their scientific knowledge generation. We also consider the moderating effect of the redundant industrial scientific knowledge and the amount of technical knowledge from external technical cooperators. The social network analysis method is used to establish both ego- and industrial-scientific cooperation network, and ego-technical cooperation network in order to analyze the external scientific knowledge and technical knowledge. The empirical analysis is based on patent and article data of 106 organizations in the biomass energy industry (including firms, universities and research institutes), and the results show that organizations’ structural holes and degree centrality of scientific cooperation network have positive effects on their scientific knowledge generation. In addition, organizations’ degree centrality of technical cooperation network positively moderates the relationship between their degree centrality of scientific cooperation network and scientific knowledge generation. Furthermore, density of industrial scientific cooperation network decreases the positive effect of organizations’ structural holes on their scientific knowledge generation, while it strengthens the positive effect of degree centrality of scientific cooperation network on their scientific knowledge generation. Academic contributions and practical suggestions are discussed.

Download Full-text