scholarly journals Contractual and legal regulation of preservation of results of scientific research in confidentiality and use of such information in case of research and development: practices of EU and countries of the world

2021 ◽  
pp. 202-213
Author(s):  
K. SHAHBAZYAN
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
The World ◽  
Access Rights ◽  
Different Sources ◽  
The Eu

The article analyzes the category of agreements in the field of research and development – non-disclosure agreements (confidentiality agreements), provides examples of such agreements with different sources of funding; as well as there are being considered the wordings of confidentiality provisions in general agreements for research and development –  the article compares the practice of application of these provisions in the EU and countries of the world. The requirements are considered for settling the issues of protection of intellectual property rights in the aspect of confidentiality and distribution of rights to use the information, obtained during the research in the project, use of such info during the further researches and granting access rights to such information to third parties. Aspects that should be included in similar types of agreements in Ukraine are proposed.

scholarly journals NATIONAL STRATEGY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONA OBLIGATIONS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Катерина Горбачова ◽  
Валентина Нежевело ◽  
Ірина Хайхан
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
National Strategy ◽  
Association Agreement ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Eu

In times of a deep economic crisis, international support, including economic support, depends largely on fulfillment of the international obligations undertaken by Ukraine. Due to the complexity of the reforms implemented by Ukrainian society, political infighting, lack of politicalwill, unity and consistency in the implemented reforms, our country today recognizes the improper and untimely implementation of certain provisions of the Association Agreement with the EU. Intellectual activity permeates all spheres of society, its results, intellectual property rights are in constant development, changing, new objects appear, which presents new requirements for legal systems, on the legal regulation of the specified sphere, and arising out legal relationships. Today, implementation of the Association Agreement with the EU, one of the Chapters of which is the field of intellectual property, assumes of economic and political importance. However, even the judicial reform introduced and the creation of the High Court on Intellectual Property have not deliver their expected results. All because of inconsistency of actions of legislative and executive branches of power, lack of systematicity in reform, and its insufficient substantiation.That is why, today, there is a growing need for the adoption of the National Strategy for the Development of the Intellectual Property Sphere for the period 2020–2025, which should become a comprehensive reflection of the state policy in the field of intellectualproperty. As to its legal nature, the National Strategy for the Development of Intellectual Property is a set of measures aimed at: (creating) promoting and encouraging the creation of intellectual property rights; (use) the introduction of favorable conditions andmechanisms for the use of intellectual property rights in production and other economic sectors; establishment of effective public administration in the field of intellectual property; increase of efficiency of activity of state institutions of the intellectual property protection system, examination of applications and issuance of security documents; improvement of legislation on protection of intellectual property rights; improving the mechanisms of protection of intellectual property rights; formation of a high level of culture and education in the field of intellectual property in order to build a competitive national economy, based on knowledge and innovation and implemented by the Government of our country. The effectiveness of the Strategy depends on the successful implementation of judicial reform and the effective work of the High Court on Intellectual Property.

scholarly journals Features of the protection of the intellectual property related to the military-industrial complex of Russia

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 02013
Author(s):  
Mikhail Kuznetsov ◽  
Viktor Ponka ◽  
Ivan Chumachenko
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Trade Relations ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
The World ◽  
The Military

An integral part of today’s cross-border civil and trade relations is cooperation and trade in the military-industrial complex. One of the key problems for the countries selling production of the military-industrial complex is the protection of the intellectual property rights in the field of defence industry. Russia, being one of the biggest arms exporters in the world, has accumulated an interesting experience of legal regulation of this problem. This article focuses on aspects of intellectual property protection in the sphere of military-industrial complex.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights within the EU Digital Market

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iryna Yavorska ◽  
Sofiya Boyarska
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
European Parliament ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Domain Name ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Council Directive ◽  
The Eu

The active usage of the technologies, constant exchange of information and its use demanded a clear regulation of relations within the functioning of the digital market. In the context of the implementation of the Association Agreements between Ukraine and the EU, it seems necessary to study the positive experience of regulating relations and protecting intellectual property rights within the European Union digital market. The article explores such EU secondary law acts as directives and regulations that determine the foundations and features of the functioning of EU digital market actors. In particular, it examined Directive (EU) 2019/789 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 laying down rules on the use of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online broadcasting and retransmission of broadcasting programs and amending Council Directive 93/83 EEC (2019), which regulates the principles governing the transboundary transmission of television and radio broadcasting via the satellite network; Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/2019, which amended and expended 7 existing Directives governing relevant issues, Regulation (EU) 2019/517 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 on the implementation and operation of the .eu top-level domain name and amending and repealing Regulation (EU) No 733/2002, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2002 (2019), which provides a number of important innovations for the .eu top-level domain name and Regulation (EU) No 2017/1128 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the cross-border movement of Internet content services in the internal market, which identifies legitimate access to portable internet-Content. Not only when they are in their own country, but also when moving within the EU. Key words: digital market; legal regulation of EU digital market functioning; .eu top-level domain name; portable internet content; cross-border transmission.

scholarly journals INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS THE POTENTIAL FOR INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-83
Author(s):  
Volodymyr KHAUSTOV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Intellectual Property Right ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
High Position ◽  
Global Innovation ◽  
The World ◽  
The Eu

Socio-economic development of Ukraine in the medium and long term is impossible without a radical reform of intellectual property as a basis for intensifying innovation processes. The generalization of tendencies and experience of the leading countries of the world concerning creation, protection and commercialization of objects of the intellectual property right revealed the strong and weak positions of Ukraine. Thus, Ukraine is in the group of leading countries in the generalized indicator of activity for filing applications for industrial property by country of origin, has a high position of the relevant indicators of the Global Innovation Index for 2020. Domestic inventors retain the potential to create objects of intellectual property rights mainly for protection in the domestic market: the number of applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty system does not exceed 200, which is 320 times less than the inventors of China. However, the gross expenditure on R&D in GDP is 6-10 times lower than in the leading countries of the world. The low level of the national system of intellectual property protection is evidenced by the fact that Ukraine is under the supervision of the Office of the US Trade Representative and in the EU Priority Watch List, which includes countries with the most serious problems in the field of intellectual property protection. The experience of the EU and the USA in the context of reforming the system of protection of intellectual property rights in the domestic and foreign markets, including counterfeiting, falsification, piracy and plagiarism, is important for Ukraine. The potential for the commercialization of intellectual property is evidenced by the high position of the relevant indicators of the Global Innovation Index, in particular on the export and import of intellectual property rights. The basis of Ukraine's innovation policy should be formed using a modern methodological approach based on demand, in particular, on public procurement, updating the regulatory environment, supporting private demand and more. This approach will facilitate the commercialization of R&D results and objects of intellectual property rights.

La (des)protección de la propiedad intelectual de las obras del poder público

2017 ◽  
pp. 199-232
Author(s):  
Juan Antonio Ureña Salcedo
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Public Power

LABURPENA: Lan honen hasieran, jabetza intelektualaren arauek botere publikoaren erabilerari (izan botere legegilea, betearazlea nahiz judiziala) lotutako obrei ematen dioten babesgabetasuna aztertzen da. Babesgabetasun hori XXIi. Mendean azkenean ezarri behar den gardentasun publikoari ezin hobeto lotuta dago. Informazio publikoa eskuratzeari eta hura berrerabiltzeari buruzko lege batzuen arabera, ordea, jabetza intelektualaren eskubideak egotea muga bat izan daiteke bai hura eskuratzeko bai berrerabiltzeko. Azterlan honetan lege-irtenbide horren aurkako argudioak ematen dira. Bestalde, jabetza intelektualaren eskubideen titulartasuna lan egiten den administrazioari dagokiola defendatzen eta argudiatzen da hemen (hirugarrenen sarbide hori erraztu behar luke horrek). RESUMEN: Comienza este trabajo con un análisis sobre la desprotección por las normas de propiedad intelectual de las obras vinculadas al ejercicio del poder público (ya sea el Legislativo, el Ejecutivo o el Judicial). Esta desprotección liga perfectamente con la transparencia pública, que tiene que acabar imponiéndose en el s. XXI. Algunas leyes de acceso a la información pública y de reutilización de la misma, sin embargo, apuntan que la existencia de derechos de propiedad intelectual puede constituir un límite tanto para el acceso como para la reutilización. En este estudio se aportan argumentos en contra de esta solución legal. Aquí se sostiene y se fundamenta, además, que la titularidad de los derechos de propiedad intelectual corresponde a la Administración para la que se trabaja (lo que debería facilitar dicho acceso por terceros). ABSTRACT: This work begins with an analysis about the vulnerability provoked by the intellectual property rules regarding works linked to the exercise of public power (either the legislative, the executive or the judiciary). This vulnerability connects perfectly with public transparency, which eventually has to be imposed in the XXI century. Nevertheless, some Acts on access to public information and its re-use indicate that the existence of intellectual property rights can be a limit both for the access and re-use. This study provides arguments against this legal solution. It is argued and justified, besides, that the ownership of intellectual property rights belongs to the Administration to whom someone works (which should facilitate that access by third parties).

scholarly journals Effective factors to encourage the foreign direct investment in Iraq

2018 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 02038
Author(s):  
Shahla Mohammad Ali
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
World Bank ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Effective Factors ◽  
World Bank Report ◽  
The World

Foreign direct investment in Iraq cannot take its complete role for different reasons, such as: Lack of security, Corruption, Lack of Transparency, Unequipped banking system, undeveloped arbitration law, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) issue, and internal disputes over oil rights. It was found that Iraq rates as one of the worst places in the world to do business, languishing at 166 out of 183 countries, according to a World Bank report and for starting a business Iraq ranks even lower

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document