Determination of In Vitro Synergy of Ampicilin and Chloramphenicol against Multidrug Resistant Bacillus cereus Species

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZT-AVI) are novel antibiotic combinations active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate their in vitro activities and inoculum effects in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), including carbapenemase-producing (CP)-CRE and non-CP-CRE. A total of 81 independent clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were collected. CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were evaluated by broth microdilution using standard and high inocula. The inoculum effect was defined as an ≥8-fold increase in MIC with high inoculum. Phenotypic determination of β-lactam resistance mechanism and PCR for carbapenemase genes were performed. Of the 81 CRE isolates, 35 (43%) were CP-CRE. Overall, 73% of the isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, and 95% had low AZT-AVI MICs (≤8 µg/mL). The MIC50/MIC90s of CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 4/≥512 µg/mL and 0.5/4 µg/mL, respectively. CAZ-AVI was more active against non-CP-CRE than against CP-CRE (susceptibility 80% vs. 63%, p = 0.08; MIC50/MIC90, 2/16 μg/mL vs. 4/≥512 μg/mL), whereas AZT-AVI was more active against CP-CRE (MIC50/MIC90, 0.25/1 μg/mL vs. 0.5/8 μg/mL). All four isolates with high AZT-AVI MIC (≥16 μg/mL) were resistant to CAZ-AVI, but only 18% (4/22) of CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates had high AZT-AVI MIC. The rates of the inoculum effect for CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 18% and 47%, respectively (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the frequency of the AZT-AVI inoculum effect was higher in K. pneumoniae than E. coli (64% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). AZT-AVI is more active against CRE than CAZ-AVI, even in CP-CRE and CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates. The presence of a substantial inoculum effect may contribute to clinical failure in high-inoculum infections treated with AZT-AVI.

Download Full-text

Determination of In Vitro Activities of Polymyxin B and Rifampin in Combination with Ampicillin/Sulbactam or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by the E-test and Checkerboard Methods

Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases ◽

10.7883/yoken.66.463 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 66 (6) ◽

pp. 463-468 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Emel Sesli Cetin ◽

Alper Tekeli ◽

Ayşe Gul Ozseven ◽

Ebru Us ◽

Buket Cicioglu Aridogan

Keyword(s):

Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽

Polymyxin B ◽

Multidrug Resistant

Download Full-text

In Vitro Susceptibility of Multi-Drug Resistant Klebsiellapneumoniae Strains Causing Nosocomial Infections to Fosfomycin. A Comparison of Determination Methods

Pathogens ◽

10.3390/pathogens10050512 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (5) ◽

pp. 512

Author(s):

Beata Mączyńska ◽

Justyna Paleczny ◽

Monika Oleksy-Wawrzyniak ◽

Irena Choroszy-Król ◽

Marzenna Bartoszewicz

Keyword(s):

Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽

Nosocomial Infections ◽

Reference Method ◽

Multidrug Resistant ◽

Automated System ◽

Diffusion Method ◽

In Vitro Susceptibility ◽

The Phoenix

Introduction: Over the past few decades, Klebsiella pneumoniae strains increased their pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance, thereby becoming a major therapeutic challenge. One of the few available therapeutic options seems to be intravenous fosfomycin. Unfortunately, the determination of sensitivity to fosfomycin performed in hospital laboratories can pose a significant problem. Therefore, the aim of the present research was to evaluate the activity of fosfomycin against clinical, multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from nosocomial infections between 2011 and 2020, as well as to evaluate the methods routinely used in hospital laboratories to assess bacterial susceptibility to this antibiotic. Materials and Methods: 43 multidrug-resistant Klebsiella strains isolates from various infections were tested. All the strains had ESBL enzymes, and 20 also showed the presence of carbapenemases. Susceptibility was determined using the diffusion method (E-test) and the automated system (Phoenix), which were compared with the reference method (agar dilution). Results: For the reference method and for the E-test, the percentage of strains sensitive to fosfomycin was 65%. For the Phoenix system, the percentage of susceptible strains was slightly higher and stood at 72%. The percentage of fosfomycin-resistant strains in the Klebsiella carbapenemase-producing group was higher (45% for the reference method and E-test and 40% for the Phoenix method) than in carbapenemase-negative strains (25%, 25%, and 20%, respectively). Full (100%) susceptibility categorical agreement was achieved for the E-test and the reference method. Agreement between the automated Phoenix system and the reference method reached 86%. Conclusions: Fosfomycin appears to be the antibiotic with a potential for use in the treatment of infections with multidrug-resistant Klebsiella strains. Susceptibility to this drug is exhibited by some strains, which are resistant to colistin and carbapenems. The E-test, unlike the Phoenix method, can be an alternative to the reference method in the routine determination of fosfomycin susceptibility, as it shows agreement in terms of sensitivity categories and only slight differences in MIC values. The Phoenix system, in comparison to the reference method, shows large discrepancies in the MIC values and in the susceptibility category.

Download Full-text

Pharmacodynamics of Telithromycin In Vitro against Respiratory Tract Pathogens

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.45.1.23-29.2001 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 45 (1) ◽

pp. 23-29 ◽

Cited By ~ 50

Author(s):

Inga Odenholt ◽

Elisabeth Löwdin ◽

Otto Cars

Keyword(s):

Kinetic Model ◽

Respiratory Tract ◽

Multidrug Resistant ◽

Postantibiotic Effect ◽

Gram Positive Bacteria ◽

New Class ◽

Fixed Concentration ◽

Inoculum Effect

ABSTRACT Telithromycin (HMR 3647) is a new ketolide that belongs to a new class of semisynthetic 14-membered-ring macrolides which have expanded activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. The aim of the present study was to investigate different basic pharmacodynamic properties of this new compound. The following studies of telithromycin were performed: (i) studies of the rate and extent of killing of respiratory tract pathogens with different susceptibilities to erythromycin and penicillin exposed to a fixed concentration that corresponds to a dose of 800 mg in humans, (ii) studies of the rate and extent of killing of telithromycin at five different concentrations, (iii) studies of the rate and extent of killing of the same pathogens at three different inocula, (iv) studies of the postantibiotic effect and the postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of telithromycin, and (v) determination of the rate and extent of killing of telithromycin in an in vitro kinetic model. In conclusion, telithromycin exerted an extremely fast killing of all strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae both with static concentrations and in the in vitro kinetic model. A slower killing of the strains of Streptococcus pyogenes was noted, with regrowth in the kinetic model of a macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B-inducible strain. The strains ofHaemophilus influenzae were not killed at all at a concentration of 0.6 mg/liter due to high MICs. A time-dependent killing was seen for all strains. No inoculum effect was seen for the strains of S. pneumoniae, with a 99.9% reduction in the numbers of CFU for all inocula at both 8 h and 24 h. The killing of the strains of S. pyogenes was reduced by 1 log10 CFU at 8 h and 2 to 3 log10 CFU at 24 h when the two lower inocula were used but not at all at 8 and 24 h when the highest inoculum was used. For both of the H. influenzae strains there was an inoculum effect, with 1 to 2 log10 CFU less killing for the inoculum of 108CFU/ml in comparison to that for the inoculum of 106CFU/ml. Overall, telithromycin exhibited long postantibiotic effects and postantibiotic sub-MIC effects for all strains investigated.

Download Full-text