A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Comparison of the Antiemetic Efficacy of Dolasetron Versus Ondansetron for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting During High-Dose Myeloablative Chemotherapy

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romeo A. Mandanas ◽  
Roy Beveridge ◽  
Robert M. Rifkin ◽  
Hugh Wallace ◽  
Andrew Greenspan ◽  
...  
1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Strum ◽  
J E McDermed ◽  
D F Liponi

We tested the safety and antiemetic effectiveness of intravenous (IV) dexamethasone (DXM) as an adjunct to high-dose IV metoclopramide (MCP) to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. Response was determined by using objective and subjective criteria. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive MCP alone at a dose of 2 mg/kg IV for three doses or the same dose of MCP plus 20 mg of DXM IV for three doses. Twenty evaluable patients received a second course of cisplatin and were crossed over to the opposite arm. Study results did not show a statistically significant advantage of combination MCP plus DXM over MCP alone using strict objective criteria for antiemetic response. However, patients subjectively preferred MCP plus DXM over MCP alone by nearly a 6:1 ratio, regardless of the randomization sequence. Although the addition of DXM does not appear to objectively improve emetic protection with high-dose MCP, we recommend MCP plus DXM to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy when the use of steroids is not contraindicated, in view of patient preference for the combination.


1981 ◽  
Vol 305 (16) ◽  
pp. 905-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Gralla ◽  
Loretta M. Itri ◽  
Sharon E. Pisko ◽  
Anna E. Squillante ◽  
David P. Kelsen ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Aapro ◽  
P M Plezia ◽  
D S Alberts ◽  
V Graham ◽  
S E Jones ◽  
...  

Nausea and vomiting remain common and debilitating side effects of therapy with many anticancer drugs. Recent reports have shown that both metoclopramide and dexamethasone are effective drugs for the treatment of severe nausea and vomiting caused by cis-platinum. A double-blind crossover study comparing the antiemetic properties of high-dose oral and intravenous regimens of metoclopramide and dexamethasone in outpatients was carried out. Standardized patient questionnaires and interviews were used to evaluate response. Dexamethasone and metoclopramide protected against more than five episodes of emesis in 48% and 40% of patients, respectively. Nausea persisted for less than six hours in 45% of patients on dexamethasone and in 37% on metoclopramide. The antiemetic efficacy of both regimens was retained through repeated courses of chemotherapy. Side effects were minimal with dexamethasone; however, 33% of patients experienced unacceptable extrapyramidal side effects to metoclopramide. Patient preference was significantly in favor of dexamethasone: 70% of patients chose to continue dexamethasone compared to 22% who preferred metoclopramide and 8% who chose other antiemetics. Dexamethasone was the preferred antiemetic in this patient population due to minimal side effects.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Krolewiecki ◽  
Adrián Lifschitz ◽  
Matías Moragas ◽  
Marina Travacio ◽  
Ricardo Valentini ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (41) ◽  
pp. 5690-5697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorrin M. Koran ◽  
Elias Aboujaoude

Many patients with OCD respond partially or not at all to standard medications and cognitive behavioral therapy approaches, making alternate treatments necessary. We review the preliminary evidence that exists in support of the use of stimulants, high-dose caffeine, opiates, memantine, ondansetron, ketamine, and transcranial magnetic stimulation in some patients with OCD. Although limited by small or modest sample sizes, open-label study designs, and brief follow-up periods, studies suggest that each of these strategies can help some patients who have inadequately responded to first-line treatments. The existing data and the unmet needs of OCD patients justify research attention to further test these treatments’ safety and efficacy. Previously untested drugs also deserve attention, especially as recent research has suggested new possible contributors to OCD pathophysiology. Similarly, psychotherapeutic interventions beyond CBT should be investigated, and treatments with preliminary evidence in OCD, including Acceptance Commitment Therapy, Danger Ideation Reduction Therapy, and technology-enabled interventions like computerized CBT and Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy, should be carefully tested.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (27) ◽  
pp. 2035-2044
Author(s):  
Charlien Berghen ◽  
Steven Joniau ◽  
Annouschka Laenen ◽  
Gaetan Devos ◽  
Kato Rans ◽  
...  

Radical prostatectomy is a well-established treatment option in the management of localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. An extended lymphadenectomy is performed in case of substantial risk for lymph node involvement. When biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs, salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is performed. The benefit in terms of BCR-free survival (FS) and metastasis-FS by adding 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared with SRT only has already been established. Retrospective evidence suggests that a longer schedule of ADT may be more beneficial compared with 6 months. This multicenter open-label randomized trial will include patients who need SRT after experiencing BCR post-radical prostatectomy with lymphadenectomy and pN0-status. Patients will be randomized for ADT duration (6 vs 24 months). Primary end point is distant metastasis-FS. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04242017 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )


Author(s):  
Fiona V Cresswell ◽  
David B Meya ◽  
Enock Kagimu ◽  
Daniel Grint ◽  
Lindsey te Brake ◽  
...  

Abstract Background High-dose rifampicin may improve outcomes of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Little safety or pharmacokinetic (PK) data exist on high-dose rifampicin in HIV co-infection, and no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) PK data exist from Africa. We hypothesized that high-dose rifampicin would increase serum and CSF concentrations without excess toxicity. Methods In this phase II open-label trial, Ugandan adults with suspected TBM were randomised to standard-of-care control (PO-10, rifampicin 10mg/kg/day), intravenous rifampicin (IV-20, 20mg/kg/day), or high-dose oral rifampicin (PO-35, 35mg/kg/day). We performed PK sampling on day 2 and 14. The primary outcomes were total exposure (AUC0-24), maximum concentration (Cmax), CSF concentration and grade 3-5 adverse events. Results We enrolled 61 adults, 92% were HIV-positive, median CD4 count was 50cells/µL (IQR 46–56). On day 2, geometric mean plasma AUC0-24hr was 42.9h.mg/L with standard-of-care 10mg/kg dosing, 249h.mg/L for IV-20 and 327h.mg/L for PO-35 (P<0.001). In CSF, standard-of-care achieved undetectable rifampicin concentration in 56% of participants and geometric mean AUC0-24hr 0.27mg/L, compared with 1.74mg/L (95%CI 1.2–2.5) for IV-20 and 2.17mg/L (1.6–2.9) for PO-35 regimens (p<0.001). Achieving CSF concentrations above rifampicin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) occurred in 11% (2/18) of standard-of-care, 93% (14/15) of IV-20, and 95% (18/19) of PO-35 participants. Higher serum and CSF levels were sustained at day 14. Adverse events did not differ by dose (p=0.34) Conclusion Current international guidelines result in sub-therapeutic CSF rifampicin concentration for 89% of Ugandan TBM patients. High-dose intravenous and oral rifampicin were safe, and respectively resulted in exposures ~6- and ~8-fold higher than standard-of-care, and CSF levels above the MIC


2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Woo Lee ◽  
Javad Alam ◽  
Nichelle Llewellyn ◽  
Shelley Hurwitz ◽  
Ellen B. Bubrick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document