scholarly journals SOLVING THE PROBLEMS OF DAYLIGHTING AND TRADITION CONTINUITY IN A RECONSTRUCTED VERNACULAR BUILDING

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 873-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eglė Šiožinytė ◽  
Jurgita Antuchevičienė
Keyword(s):  
Rational Solution ◽  
Vernacular Architecture ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Vernacular Building ◽  
Product Assessment ◽  
Vernacular Buildings

Seeking for saving traditional forms, sizes, proportions and other features of vernacular architecture and satisfying norms for a contemporary building sometimes is not an easy task. The presented case study about indoor daylighting in Lithuanian vernacular architecture shows the existing problem. The authors of the article suggest possible variants of how to improve daylighting in vernacular buildings. The aim of the conducted research is to propose a rational solution to the problem using multiple criteria assessment. Alternative variants can be characterized by a number of quantitative and qualitative criteria. Thus, for ranking alternatives and achieving the most rational solution, the use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the relative importance of criteria as well as the application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are put forward. The case study presents possible alternatives for improving daylighting in the reconstructed building and simultaneously analyses the process of saving the features of vernacular architecture applying the AHP for weighting criteria and Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) for ranking alternative solutions. It is estimated that the utility degree of the best ranked alternative exceeds the further ranked alternatives from 29 to 49 percent.

scholarly journals UPGRADING THE OLD VERNACULAR BUILDING TO CONTEMPORARY NORMS: MULTIPLE CRITERIA APPROACH

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eglė Šiožinytė ◽  
Jurgita Antuchevičienė ◽  
Vladislavas Kutut
Keyword(s):  
Energy Savings ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Vernacular Architecture ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Uncertain Information ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Grey Systems Theory ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Vernacular Building

Sustainable development is emphasized in the process of construction or modernization of buildings at present. Old vernacular architecture does not satisfy contemporary building norms such as daylighting and/or thermal performance parameters. These parameters are important for sustainability due to their relation with energy savings. It is obvious that seeking to improve these parameters, old buildings should be upgraded. The main problem is how to reach contemporary building norms without a negative impact to architectural heritage in a process of modernisation. The aim of the research is to find the best compromise solution for effective vernacular architecture's change. The Authors suggest using multiple criteria approach that enables to evaluate possible alternative solutions in several controversial aspects and to find rational building's modernisation type. Also, suitability of combination of usual MCDM (Multiple Criteria Decision Making) methods with grey systems theory due to possibility of processing of large quantity of uncertain information is highlighted in the research. TOPSIS Grey (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution with grey numbers) and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) methods are applied for the presented case study of upgrading the old vernacular building. Taking into account multiple quantitative and qualitative criteria and experts' opinion, the rational vernacular building's modernisation variant is chosen. Based on the comprehensive analysis, research conclusions and recommendations are formulated.

Learning from failures: Design improvements using a multiple criteria decision-making process

2003 ◽  
Vol 217 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Davidson ◽  
A W Labib
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Invaluable Tool ◽  
History Of

This paper proposes a new concept of decision analysis based on a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) process. This is achieved through the provision of a systematic and generic methodology for the implementation of design improvements based on experience of past failures. This is illustrated in the form of a case study identifying the changes made to Concorde after the 2000 accident. The proposed model uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) mathematical model as a backbone and integrates elements of a modified failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). The AHP has proven to be an invaluable tool for decision support since it allows a fully documented and transparent decision to be made with full accountability. In addition, it facilitates the task of justifying improvement decisions. The paper is divided as follows: the first section presents an outline of the background to the Concorde accident and its history of related (non-catastrophic) malfunctions. The AHP methodology and its mathematical representation are then presented with the integrated FMEA applied to the Concorde accident. The case study arrives at the same conclusion as engineers working on Concorde after the accident: that the aircraft may fly again if the lining of the fuel tanks are modified.

scholarly journals Lessons from Joglo’s Tectonic Adaptability for Sustainable Future

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-115
Author(s):  
Yenny Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Vernacular Architecture ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Built Environments ◽  
Constant Change ◽  
Vernacular Building ◽  
Building Components ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Vernacular Buildings ◽  
Modern House

In order to accommodate the dynamic human activities, built environments should always be in a constant change. Demolishing, building a new or renovating building are not suitable anymore due to high cost and effort, thus discussions on creating adaptable architecture has increased significantly. This paper suggests that architects can learn from vernacular buildings which already have the capacity to adapt from hundreds years ago. A Javanese vernacular architecture type, known as Joglo, is chosen as case study due to its unique adaptability. Joglo, as a house and pendopo, has existed since the year 1700s, and it is still reuse until now as gallery, office, café/restaurant, (modern) house, hotel and shops in various locations, even outside Java Island. The analysis is divided into two phases; identifying Joglo’s adaptability by dissecting the building components according to Brand’s layers to evaluate which part of buildings changes and how much, identifying the relations between buildings’ layers and the joints’ construction with the aid of a 1:65 scale model to seek a better understanding of six adaptability strategy. In the end, the paper reveal that Joglo’s adaptability is deeply influenced by the durability of materials and the knock-down tectonic character. Hopefully, this traditional wisdom of vernacular building can be developed for the creation of sustainable architecture of the future.

scholarly journals A NEW FUZZY ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT METHOD (ARAS‐F). CASE STUDY: THE ANALYSIS OF FUZZY MULTIPLE CRITERIA IN ORDER TO SELECT THE LOGISTIC CENTERS LOCATION

Transport ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenonas Turskis ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Triangular Fuzzy Numbers ◽  
Gravity Center ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Suitable Site ◽  
Fuzzy Ranking ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The main approaches which are applied to select the logistic center are the methods of gravity center, analytic hierarchy process, similarity to ideal solution, fuzzy ranking, assessment, etc. Multiple Criteria Decision‐Making (MCDM) combines analytical and inductive knowledge, describing a domain problem, which can be fuzzy and/or incomplete. The fuzzy MCDM (FMCDM) approach can explain the problem more appropriately. The purpose of the paper is to select the most suitable site for logistic centre among a set of alternatives, to help the stakeholders with the performance evaluation in an uncertain environment, where the subjectivity and vagueness of criteria are described by triangular fuzzy numbers. The paper presents a newly‐developed ARAS‐F method to solve different problems in transport, construction, economics, technology and sustainable development.

MULTIPLE CRITERIA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DECISIONS CONSIDERING RELATIONS BETWEEN CRITERIA / DAUGIATIKSLIAI STATYBOS VALDYMO SPRENDIMAI ATSIŽVELGIANT Į RODIKLIŲ TARPUSAVIO PRIKLAUSOMYBĘ

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurgita Antuchevičienė ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ◽  
Algimantas Zakarevičius
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mahalanobis Distance ◽  
Construction Management ◽  
Distance Measure ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Topsis Technique

Decision making in construction management has been always complicated especially if there were more than one criterion under consideration. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) has been often applied for complex decisions in construction when a lot of criteria were involved. Traditional MCDM methods, however, operate with independent and conflicting criteria. While in every day problems a decision maker often faces interactive and interrelated criteria. Accordingly, the need of improving and supplementing the methodology of compromise decisions arose. It was proposed to supplement TOPSIS (Technique for the Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method and integrate the Mahalanobis distance in the usual algorythm of TOPSIS. Mahalanobis distance measure offered an option to take the correlations between the criteria into considerations while making the decision. A case study of building redevelopment in Lithuanian rural areas was presented that demonstrated the application of the proposed methodology. The case study proved that the proposed TOPSIS‐M (TOPSIS applying Mahalanobis distance measure) method could have substantial influence in carrying the proper decision. Santrauka Statybos valdymo spendimų priėmimas visuomet yra komplikuotas, ypač jei turime atsižvelgti į daugelį rodiklių. Kompleksiniams statybos sprendimams, kurie apibūdinami daugeliu rodiklių, taikomi daugiatiksliai sprendimų priėmimo metodai (MCDM ‐ Multiple Criteria Decision Making). Šie metodai skirti sprendimams priimti tuomet, kai vertinami konfliktuojantys bei nepriklausomi rodikliai. Tačiau realiose situacijose, priešingai, nuolat susiduriame su saveikaujančiais ir tarpusavio priklausomybę turinčiais rodikliais. Dėl šios priežasties kyla poreikis patobulinti sprendimų metodologiją. Straipsnyje siūloma papildyti variantų racionalumo nustatymo metoda TOPSIS (Technique for the Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), taikant Mahalanobio metoda atstumams nustatyti. Mahalanobio atstumų nustatymo metodas suteikia galimybę įvertinti koreliacinės rodiklių priklausomybės priimant daugiatikslį sprendimą. Siūlomos metodologijos taikymas įliustruojamas sprendžiant apleistų pastatų Lietuvos kaimo vietovėse racionalaus sutvarkymo uždavinį. Pateiktas pavyzdys patvirtina, kad TOPSIS‐M metodo (t. y. TOPSIS naudojant Mahalanobio atstuma) taikymas gali turėti esminę įtaka priimant sprendimą.

scholarly journals Identifying and Prioritizing Educational Needs of Female Adolescents in Relation to Healthy Eating Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Mazloomi Mahmoodabad ◽  
Akram Mehrabbeyk ◽  
Hassan Mozaffari-Khosravi ◽  
Hossein Fallahzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Fast Food ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Eating Habits ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Female Adolescents ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Eating Breakfast ◽  
Eating Fast ◽  
Hierarchy Process

<p>In order to better plan health based interventions, educators and health promoters need to make decisions in this regard. In the meantime, it should be noted that, multiple criteria decision making methods with theoretical roots and accuracy of forecasting results are less considered.</p><p>The current study is a descriptive research carried out on 15 experts working in Yazd Health Centers using purposeful sampling. In order to identify wrong eating habits of students, Delphi method is used. In the next step, these habits are compared, one by one, and scored with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model. In the end, data are analyzed using Expert Choice 11 software.</p><p>Seven major wrong eating habits of female adolescents are identified: junk food consumption, drinking soda and sweet drinks, eating fast food, deleting main meals, improper diets, low intake of vegetables, and not eating breakfast. Among these, low intake of vegetables, eating fast food, and not eating breakfast, with weight rate of 32.4%, 19.4% and 19.3%, are specified as the first three priorities of education.</p><p>In various fields of education and health promotion, including prioritizing training needs, employing techniques with potentials of assessing multiple criteria at the same time can be highly efficient. </p>

scholarly journals A Q-RUNG ORTHOPAIR FUZZY GLDS METHOD FOR INVESTMENT EVALUATION OF BE ANGEL CAPITAL IN CHINA

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huchang Liao ◽  
Hongrun Zhang ◽  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Xingli Wu ◽  
Abbas Mardani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Set ◽  
Distance Measure ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Investment Evaluation ◽  
Dominance Score ◽  
Do So

As a generalized form of both intuitionistic fuzzy set and Pythagorean fuzzy sets, the q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS) has strong ability to handle uncertain or imprecision decisionmaking problems. This paper aims to introduce a new multiple criteria decision making method based on the original gain and lost dominance score (GLDS) method for investment evaluation. To do so, we first propose a new distance measure of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers (q-ROFNs), which takes into account the hesitancy degree of q-ROFNs. Subsequently, two methods are developed to determine the weights of DMs and criteria, respectively. Next, the original GLDS method is improved from the aspects of dominance flows and order scores of alternatives to address the multiple criteria decision making problems with q-ROFS information. Finally, a case study concerning the investment evaluation of the BE angle capital is given to illustrate the applicability and superiority of the proposed method.

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: An entropy-based approach to assess tourism sustainability

2019 ◽  
pp. 135481661988520
Author(s):  
Joseph Andria ◽  
Giacomo di Tollo ◽  
Raffaele Pesenti
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Entropy Maximization ◽  
Tourist Destinations ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Direct Applicability

In this article, we propose a method for ranking tourist destinations and evaluating their performances under a sustainability perspective: a fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making method is applied for determining sustainability performance values and ranking destinations accordingly. We select a set of sustainability evaluation criteria and use a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to weight the selected criteria. We also optimize each evaluator’s membership function support by means of a fuzzy entropy maximization criteria. A case study is illustrated and results are compared with two data envelopment analysis–based models. The simplicity of the proposed approach along with the easy readability of the results allow its direct applicability for all involved stakeholders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document