scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Her-2 Protein in the Genesis of Cervical Carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arshad H. Rahmani ◽  
Ali Yousif ABabiker ◽  
Mohammed A. Alsahli ◽  
Saleh A. Almatroodi ◽  
Nazik Elmalaika O. S. Husain
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Cervical Carcinoma ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in the progression of tumours through the formation of new blood vessels. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a chief factor responsible for inducing and regulating angiogenesis. Additionally, the human epidermal growth factor receptor family of receptors also plays an important role in the pathogenesis of tumours.AIM: This study aimed to examine the association between VEGF and Her-2 protein expression and its correlation with clinic-pathological characteristics; in particular, prognosis.METHODS: A total of 65 cases of cervical carcinoma and 10 samples of inflammatory lesions were evaluated for VEGF and Her-2 protein expression.RESULTS: Expression of VEGF and Her-2 was detected in 63.07% and 43.07% in cervical carcinoma cases respectively whereas control cases did not show any expression. The difference in the expression pattern of both markers comparing cancer and control cases was statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference in the expression pattern of VEGF protein was observed among the different grades and stages of tumours (p > 0.05). Comparing different grades of a tumour, expression of Her-2 was detected in 31.8% of well-differentiated tumours, 36.0 % in moderately differentiated tumours and 66.66 % in poorly differentiated cancers. The expression of Her-2 was increased in high-grade tumours, and the difference of expression level between tumour grades was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The expression level of Her-2 protein was not correlated with the stage of a tumour (p > 0.05).CONCLUSION: The present study supports earlier findings that over-expression / up-regulation of VEGF and Her - 2 is linked with poor prognosis and may play a vital role in the development and progression of cervical cancer.

scholarly journals The VAD Scheme versus Thalidomide plus VAD for Reduction of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Gan-Lin He ◽  
Duo-Rong Xu ◽  
Wai-Yi Zou ◽  
Sui-Zhi He ◽  
Juan Li
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

The VAD (vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone) regimen has been used for decades to treat multiple myeloma (MM). Based on reports that vascular endothelial growth factor- (VEGF-) mediated angiogenesis is critical for MM pathogenesis, the antiangiogenic compound thalidomide has been added to VAD (T-VAD). However, it remains unclear whether T-VAD is more efficacious than VAD for serum VEGF reduction or if the difference influences clinical outcome. Pubmed, Cochrane library, China Biomedical Literature (CBM) database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Vip database, and Wanfang database were searched for relevant studies published up to June 2017. RevMan5.2 was used for methodological quality evaluation and data extraction. Thirteen trials (five randomized, seven nonrandomized, and one historically controlled) involving 815 cases were included. Serum VEGF was significantly higher in MM cases than non-MM controls (MD=353.01, [95%CI 187.52–518.51], P<0.01), and the overall efficacy of T-VAD was higher than that of VAD (RR=1.36, [1.21–1.53], P <0.01). Further, T-VAD reduced VEGF to a greater extent than VAD does ([MD=-49.85, [-66.28− -33.42], P<0.01). The T-VAD regimen also reduced VEGF to a greater extent in newly diagnosed MM patients than it did in recurrent patients ([MD=-120.20, [-164.60–-39.80], P<0.01). There was no significant difference in VEGF between T-VAD patients (2 courses) and nontumor controls (MD=175.94, [-26.08–377.95], P=0.09). Greater serum VEGF reduction may be responsible for the superior efficacy of T-VAD compared to VAD.

Expression pattern of vascular endothelial growth factor 2 during sea urchin development

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 402-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulia O. Kipryushina ◽  
Konstantin V. Yakovlev ◽  
Milana A. Kulakova ◽  
Nelly A. Odintsova
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Sea Urchin ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Measurement of free and complexed soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, Flt-1, in fluid samples: development and application of two new immunoassays

2001 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 567-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Funmi M. BELGORE ◽  
Andrew D. BLANN ◽  
Gregory Y. LIP
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Biological Significance ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Soluble Form ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mediates endothelial cell mitogenesis and enhances vascular permeability. VEGF interacts with the endothelium via two membrane-spanning receptors, fms-like tyrosine kinase (Flt)-1 and kinase domain receptor. A soluble form of Flt-1 (sFlt-1) was isolated from endothelial cell media; however, its biological significance is still unknown, with limited data on plasma sFlt-1 levels in disease states. We have developed two new ELISAs for detecting free and VEGF-complexed sFlt-1, which were tested in accordance with standard validation and assessment methodologies employed in commercial settings. The intra-and inter-assay coefficients of variation are < 5% and 10% respectively, and results are highly reproducible. Applying these ELISAs in a clinical setting, we measured levels of VEGF, free and complexed sFlt-1 in citrated plasma from 40 patients with cardiovascular disease and 40 healthy controls. Median (interquartile range) plasma levels of VEGF in patients were significantly greater than controls [403 pg/ml (158–925 pg/ml) versus 113 pg/ml (33–231 pg/ml), P ⩽ 0.05]. Free sFlt-1 was significantly lower in patients compared with controls [8 ng/ml (2–22 ng/ml) versus 21 ng/ml (10–73 ng/ml), P ⩽ 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the levels of complexed sFlt-1 between the two groups. Plasma levels of VEGF-complexed sFlt-1 are minimal, despite the presence of excess free sFlt-1. Thus unbound plasma VEGF detected by ELISA may represent the majority of circulating VEGF, and justifies the measurement of plasma VEGF as an indicator of circulating VEGF levels. Furthermore, these results suggest that circulating sFlt-1 may serve as a selective inhibitor of VEGF activity, and that this regulatory mechanism may be altered by pathological conditions.

scholarly journals Assessment of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Fresh versus Frozen Platelet Rich Plasma

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Hosny ◽  
Fikry Goubran ◽  
Basma BadrEldin Hasan ◽  
Noha Kamel
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Calcium Gluconate ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Growth Factor Release ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Vegf Release

Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is hemoconcentration with platelets concentration above baseline values and high concentration of many growth factors. The aim of this study was to assess freezing effect on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release from PRP using two different activation methods to simplify its use in different clinical applications. PRP was prepared using two-centrifugation steps method from 12 qualified blood donors. VEGF concentrations were measured in fresh PRP and after freezing/thawing for one and three weeks with two methods of activation using (i) calcium gluconate and (ii) calcium gluconate and thrombin. Platelets count was significantly increased compared to baseline whole blood values in all fresh and frozen PRP samples (p value was <0.05). No significant difference was found between VEGF concentrations after activating fresh and frozen-thawed PRP samples for one and three weeks by calcium alone or calcium with thrombin, and also no significant difference was found when freezing period was extended from one to three weeks. Our results showed that platelets count does not correlate with variable levels of VEGF. PRP could be prepared once and preserved frozen for at least three weeks for the next treatment sessions and activation with thrombin addition to calcium will not augment the growth factor release.

Differences in vascular endothelial growth factor receptor expression and correlation with the degree of enhancement in medulloblastoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper ◽  
Hugh J. L. Garton ◽  
Darryl Lau ◽  
David Altshuler ◽  
Douglas J. Quint ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Object Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the major proangiogenic factor in many solid tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) is expressed in abundance in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma and is associated with tumor metastasis, poor prognosis, and proliferation. Gadolinium enhancement on MRI has been suggested to have prognostic significance for some tumors. The association of VEGF/VEGFR and Gd enhancement in medulloblastoma has never been closely examined. The authors therefore sought to evaluate whether Gd-enhancing medulloblastomas have higher levels of VEGFR and CD31. Outcomes and survival in patients with enhancing and nonenhancing tumors were also compared. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with enhancing, nonenhancing, and partially enhancing medulloblastomas was performed. Primary end points included risk stratification, extent of resection, and perioperative complications. A cohort of 3 enhancing and 3 nonenhancing tumors was selected for VEGFR and CD31 analysis as well as microvessel density measurements. Results Fifty-eight patients were analyzed, and 20.7% of the medulloblastomas in these patients were nonenhancing. Enhancing medulloblastomas exhibited strong VEGFR1/2 and CD31 expression relative to nonenhancing tumors. There was no significant difference in perioperative complications or patient survival between the 2 groups. Conclusions These results suggest that in patients with medulloblastoma the presence of enhancement on MRI may correlate with increased vascularity and angiogenesis, but does not correlate with worse patient prognosis in the short or long term.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document