scholarly journals Identification of Cystatin SN as a novel tumor marker for colorectal cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nakajima
2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 823-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuki Ito ◽  
ChunLin Ye ◽  
Kenji Hibi ◽  
Chikako Mitsuoka ◽  
Reiji Kannagi ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2516-2523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiping Tang ◽  
Chien Yuh Yeh ◽  
Jeng-Yi Wang ◽  
Chung Rong Changchien ◽  
Jinn-Shiun Chen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Pączek ◽  
Marta Łukaszewicz-Zając ◽  
Mariusz Gryko ◽  
Piotr Mroczko ◽  
Agnieszka Kulczyńska-Przybik ◽  
...  

Introduction. Since colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed malignancy in Europe and third worldwide, novel biomarkers for diagnosing the disease are critically needed. Objectives. According to our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate the clinical usefulness of serum CXCL-8 (C-X-C motif chemokine 8) in the diagnosis and progression of CRC compared to classical tumor marker CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) and marker of inflammation CRP (C-reactive protein). Patients and Methods. The study included 59 CRC patients and 46 healthy volunteers. Serum levels of selected proteins were measured using ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), CMIA (chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay), and immunoturbidimetric methods. Results. Serum concentrations of CXCL-8, similarly to those of the classical tumor marker CEA and inflammatory state marker CRP, were significantly higher in CRC patients than in healthy controls. There were statistically significant differences in CXCL-8 concentrations between tumor stages, as established by the Kruskal–Wallis test and confirmed by the post hoc Dwass–Steele–Critchlow–Fligner test. CXCL-8 levels were also significantly elevated in CRC patients with distant metastases compared to patients in the subgroup without metastases. Diagnostic sensitivity, predictive values for negative results (NPV), and AUC (area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve—ROC curve) of CXCL-8 were higher than those of CEA, while diagnostic specificity and predictive values for positive results (PPV) of CXCL-8 were higher than those of CRP. Conclusions. Our findings indicate greater utility of CXCL-8 in comparison to the classical tumor marker CEA in the diagnosis of CRC. Moreover, serum CXCL-8 might be a potential biomarker of colorectal cancer progression.


Author(s):  
Guadalupe Palos ◽  
Katherine R. Gilmore ◽  
Patricia Chapman ◽  
Paula Lewis-Patterson ◽  
Weiqi Bi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolong Tang ◽  
Guorui Sun ◽  
Qingsi He ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
Jingbo Shi ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Narai ◽  
Masahiko Watanabe ◽  
Hirotoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Hideki Nishibori ◽  
Takashi Endo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18-18
Author(s):  
Christiane Matuschek ◽  
Matthias Peiper ◽  
Wilfried Budach ◽  
Peter Arne Gerber ◽  
Hans Bojar ◽  
...  

18 Background: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, -2 and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP) are involved in the proliferation and differentiation of cells. It has never been evaluated if the IGF-system can serve as a tumor marker in neoplasms. Methods: In our prospective study, 163 patients with colorectal cancer (22), prostate cancer (21), glioblastoma (12), head and neck tumors (17), lymphomas (20), lung cancer (34), and other entities (37) were analysed for their IGF and IGFBP serum levels at the beginning and the end of radiotherapy and compared with 13 healthy people. Subgroups of patients with local tumor disease versus metastatic disease, primary and recurrent therapy and curative versus palliative therapy were compared. Results: The serum levels of IGF-2 were significantly elevated in patients with prostate and colorectal cancer. However, sensitivity and specificity were only 70%. IGFBP-2 serum levels were elevated in patients with head and neck tumors. Again, sensitivity and specificity were only 73%. A difference between local disease and metastatic disease could not be found. A difference between IGF serum levels before and after radiotherapy could not be detected. Conclusions: The IGF-system cannot serve as a new tumor marker. The detected differences are very small and sensitivity and specificity are too low. IGF measurement is not useful for the evaluation of the success of radiotherapy in malignancies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 654-654
Author(s):  
Toshiyasu Watanabe ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Sho Kijima ◽  
Yoshihito Ohhara ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
...  

654 Background: Panitumumab and cetuximab can be used in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and these drugs are IgG2 fully human and IgG1 chimeric (mouse/human) monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth hactor receptor (EGFR) respectively. The efficacy of panitumumab as a salvage chemotherapy after cetuximab-based chemotherapy failure is not clarified. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the panitumumab efficacy to KRAS wild-type mCRC patients who failed cetuximab-based chemotherapy. Response, progression-free survival (PFS) and serum tumor marker level (CEA and CA19-9), were assesed. We studied response by days from last cetuximab-based chemotherapy to panitumumab induction (C-P days). Results: 22 patients (11 men, 11 women, median age 54 years m4 0-78 n) were enrolled. All of thease patients were cetuximab-based chemotherapy refractory KRAS wild-type mCRC. After progression, they received panitumumab monotherapy (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks).The best response was SD 10/22 (45.5%), PD 11/22 (50%) and NE 1/22 (4.5%). Overall median PFS was 90 days (13 to 182). The patients C-P days less than 30 days were 15 patients(5:SD, 10:PD). The patients more than 79 days were 7 patient(5:SD, 1:PD, 1:NE). Serum tumor marker level was decreased more than 50% patients. Conclusions: This study suggested that it might be limited as possibility of clinical benefit with panitumumab administration after cetuximab failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document