scholarly journals MicroRNA-21 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of cervical cancer cells via tumor necrosis factor-α

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 4659-4663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Xu ◽  
Qian Xu ◽  
Xiwen Li ◽  
Xiaoling Zhang
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3266-3284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romaine Ingrid Fernando ◽  
Jay Wimalasena

Estrogens such as 17-β estradiol (E2) play a critical role in sporadic breast cancer progression and decrease apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Our studies using estrogen receptor-positive MCF7 cells show that E2 abrogates apoptosis possibly through phosphorylation/inactivation of the proapoptotic protein BAD, which was rapidly phosphorylated at S112 and S136. Inhibition of BAD protein expression with specific antisense oligonucleotides reduced the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-α, H2O2, and serum starvation in causing apoptosis. Furthermore, the ability of E2 to prevent tumor necrosis factor-α-induced apoptosis was blocked by overexpression of the BAD S112A/S136A mutant but not the wild-type BAD. BAD S112A/S136A, which lacks phosphorylation sites for p90RSK1 and Akt, was not phosphorylated in response to E2 in vitro. E2 treatment rapidly activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)/Akt and p90RSK1 to an extent similar to insulin-like growth factor-1 treatment. In agreement with p90RSK1 activation, E2 also rapidly activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and this activity was down-regulated by chemical and biological inhibition of PI-3K suggestive of cross talk between signaling pathways responding to E2. Dominant negative Ras blocked E2-induced BAD phosphorylation and the Raf-activator RasV12T35S induced BAD phosphorylation as well as enhanced E2-induced phosphorylation at S112. Chemical inhibition of PI-3K and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 inhibited E2-induced BAD phosphorylation at S112 and S136 and expression of dominant negative Ras-induced apoptosis in proliferating cells. Together, these data demonstrate a new nongenomic mechanism by which E2 prevents apoptosis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 2396-2401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilach Weisz ◽  
Alexander Damalas ◽  
Michalis Liontos ◽  
Panagiotis Karakaidos ◽  
Giulia Fontemaggi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. van Dam ◽  
Yannick Verhoeven ◽  
Julie Jacobs ◽  
An Wouters ◽  
Wiebren Tjalma ◽  
...  

RANK ligand (RANKL) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor alpha superfamily of cytokines. It is the only known ligand binding to a membrane receptor named receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK), thereby triggering recruitment of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor associated factor (TRAF) adaptor proteins and activation of downstream pathways. RANK/RANKL signaling is controlled by a decoy receptor called osteoprotegerin (OPG), but also has additional more complex levels of regulation. The existing literature on RANK/RANKL signaling in cervical cancer was reviewed, particularly focusing on the effects on the microenvironment. RANKL and RANK are frequently co-expressed in cervical cancer cells lines and in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. RANKL and OPG expression strongly increases during cervical cancer progression. RANKL is directly secreted by cervical cancer cells, which may be a mechanism they use to create an immune suppressive environment. RANKL induces expression of multiple activating cytokines by dendritic cells. High RANK mRNA levels and high immunohistochemical OPG expression are significantly correlated with high clinical stage, tumor grade, presence of lymph node metastases, and poor overall survival. Inhibition of RANKL signaling has a direct effect on tumor cell proliferation and behavior, but also alters the microenvironment. Abundant circumstantial evidence suggests that RANKL inhibition may (partially) reverse an immunosuppressive status. The use of denosumab, a monoclonal antibody directed to RANKL, as an immunomodulatory strategy is an attractive concept which should be further explored in combination with immune therapy in patients with cervical cancer.


1991 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 904-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen W. Pogrebniak ◽  
Thomas W. Prewitt ◽  
Wilbert A. Matthews ◽  
Harvey I. Pass ◽  
Robert B. Wallace

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document