scholarly journals Rheumatoid Arthritis Does Not Increase Risk of Short-term Adverse Events after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-control Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1123-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary J. LoVerde ◽  
Lisa A. Mandl ◽  
Beverly K. Johnson ◽  
Mark P. Figgie ◽  
Friedrich Boettner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Surgical Volume ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
High Volume Center ◽  
Total Knee

Objective.More adverse events (AE) are reported after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) than for patients with osteoarthritis (OA). This study evaluates 6-month postoperative AE in a high-volume center in a contemporary RA cohort.Methods.Patients with RA in an institutional registry (2007–2010) were studied. AE were identified by self-report and review of office and hospital charts. Subjects with RA were matched to 2 with OA by age, sex, and procedure. RA-specific surgical volume was determined. Baseline characteristics and AE were compared and analyzed.Results.There were 159 RA TKA and 318 OA. Of the patients with RA, 88.0% were women, 24.5% received corticosteroids, 41.5% received biologics, and 67% received nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). There was no difference in comorbidities. RA-specific surgical volume was high; 64% of cases were performed by surgeons with ≥ 20 RA cases during the study period. Patients with RA had worse baseline pain and function and lower perceived health status (EQ-5D 0.59 vs 0.65, p < 0.01). There were no deep infections in either group and no difference in superficial infection (9.4% RA vs 10.1% OA, p = 0.82), myocardial infarction (0.7% RA vs 0% OA, p = 0.33), or thromboembolism (1.3% RA vs 0.6% OA, p = 0.60).Conclusion.In a high-volume center, with high RA-specific experience, RA does not increase postoperative AE. Despite worse preoperative function and high steroid and DMARD use, complications were not increased. However, further study to determine generalizability is needed.

scholarly journals Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Weise ◽  
Julia Lühnen ◽  
Stefanie Bühn ◽  
Felicia Steffen ◽  
Sandro Zacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Nocebo Effect ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Consent Forms ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background Practitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent for surgery often focuses on risk centered information due to high liability risks for treatment errors. This may affect patients’ anxiety of adverse events and the nocebo effect. This study focuses on the optimization of pre-surgical information on risks and complications, and at the same time reconciles these information with legal requirements. Methods The development, piloting, and evaluation of evidence-based informed consent forms for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and related anesthesia procedures will follow the UK MRC Framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Conducting different sub-studies, we will (I) qualitatively explore the information acquisition and decision-making processes, (II) develop and pilot test evidence-based informed consent forms on the example of TKA and related anesthesia procedures, (III) conduct a monocentric interrupted time series (ITS) pilot study to evaluate the effects of evidence-based informed consent forms in comparison with standard consent forms, and (IV) perform a process evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention and to analyze mechanisms of impact. Discussion The evidence-based and understandable presentation of risks in informed consent forms aims at avoiding distorted risk depiction and strengthening the patients’ competencies to correctly assess the risks of undergoing surgery. This might reduce negative expectations and anxiety of adverse events, which in turn might reduce the nocebo effect. At the same time, the practitioners’ acceptance of evidence-based informed consent forms meeting legal requirements could be increased. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04669483. Registered 15 December 2020. German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS00022571. Registered 15 December 2020

scholarly journals High usage of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty negatively influences total knee arthroplasty revision rate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
Mei Lin Tay ◽  
Chris Frampton ◽  
Simon William Young
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Purpose Surgeons with higher medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) usage have lower UKA revision rates. However, an increase in UKA usage may cause a decrease of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) usage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of UKA usage on revision rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of UKA, TKA, and combined UKA + TKA results. Methods Using the New Zealand Registry Database, surgeons were divided into six groups based on their medial UKA usage: < 1%, 1–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, 20–30% and > 30%. A comparison of UKA, TKA and UKA + TKA revision rates and PROMs using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was performed. Results A total of 91,895 knee arthroplasties were identified, of which 8,271 were UKA (9.0%). Surgeons with higher UKA usage had lower UKA revision rates, but higher TKA revision rates. The lowest TKA and combined UKA + TKA revision rates were observed for surgeons performing 1–5% UKA, compared to the highest TKA and UKA + TKA revision rates which were seen for surgeons using > 30% UKA (p < 0.001 TKA; p < 0.001 UKA + TKA). No clinically important differences in UKA + TKA OKS scores were seen between UKA usage groups at 6 months, 5 years, or 10 years. Conclusion Surgeons with higher medial UKA usage have lower UKA revision rates; however, this comes at the cost of a higher combined UKA + TKA revision rate that is proportionate to the UKA usage. There was no difference in TKA + UKA OKS scores between UKA usage groups. A small increase in TKA revision rate was observed for high-volume UKA users (> 30%), when compared to other UKA usage clusters. A significant decrease in UKA revision rate observed in high-volume UKA surgeons offsets the slight increase in TKA revision rate, suggesting that UKA should be performed by specialist UKA surgeons. Level of evidence III, Retrospective therapeutic study.

Periarticular osteophyte formation protects against total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients with advanced joint damage

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 3331-3339
Author(s):  
Shuji Asai ◽  
Nobunori Takahashi ◽  
Kenya Terabe ◽  
Yasumori Sobue ◽  
Tsuyoshi Nishiume ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Damage ◽  
Osteophyte Formation ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Spinal versus general anesthesia for patients undergoing outpatient total knee arthroplasty: a national propensity matched analysis of early postoperative outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Kendall ◽  
Alexander D. Cohen ◽  
Stephanie Principe-Marrero ◽  
Peter Sidhom ◽  
Patricia Apruzzese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Anesthetic Management ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Anesthetic Techniques ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Knee Replacements ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background A comparison of different anesthetic techniques to evaluate short term outcomes has yet to be performed for patients undergoing outpatient knee replacements. The aim of this investigation was to compare short term outcomes of spinal (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing outpatient total knee replacements. Methods The ACS NSQIP datasets were queried to extract patients who underwent primary, elective, unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2005 and 2018 performed as an outpatient procedure. The primary outcome was a composite score of serious adverse events (SAE). The primary independent variable was the type of anesthesia (e.g., general vs. spinal). Results A total of 353,970 patients who underwent TKA procedures were identified comprising of 6,339 primary, elective outpatient TKA procedures. Of these, 2,034 patients received GA and 3,540 received SA. A cohort of 1,962 patients who underwent outpatient TKA under GA were propensity matched for covariates with patients who underwent outpatient TKA under SA. SAE rates at 72 h after surgery were not greater in patients receiving GA compared to SA (0.92%, 0.66%, P = 0.369). In contrast, minor adverse events were greater in the GA group compared to SA (2.09%, 0.51%), P < 0.001. The rate of postoperative transfusion was greater in the patients receiving GA. Conclusions The type of anesthetic technique, general or spinal anesthesia does not alter short term SAEs, readmissions and failure to rescue in patients undergoing outpatient TKR surgery. Recognizing the benefits of SA tailored to the anesthetic management may maximize the clinical benefits in this patient population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document