AI Fault Interpretation of vintage seismic data with implications for CCS site characterisation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Williams ◽  
P. Szafian
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Site Characterisation ◽  
Fault Interpretation

scholarly journals Fault Interpretation Uncertainties using Seismic Data, and the Effects on Fault Seal Analysis: A Case Study from the Horda Platform, with Implications for CO<sub>2</sub> storage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma A. H. Michie ◽  
Mark J. Mulrooney ◽  
Alvar Braathen
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Growth Models ◽  
Fault Analysis ◽  
Surface Generation ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Line Spacing ◽  
Fault Growth ◽  
Fault Interpretation

Abstract. Significant uncertainties occur through varying methodologies when interpreting faults using seismic data. These uncertainties are carried through to the interpretation of how faults may act as baffles/barriers or increase fluid flow. How fault segments are picked when interpreting structures, i.e. what seismic line spacing is specified, as well as what surface generation algorithm is used, will dictate how detailed the surface is, and hence will impact any further interpretation such as fault seal or fault growth models. We can observe that an optimum spacing for fault interpretation for this case study is set at approximately 100 m. It appears that any additional detail through interpretation with a line spacing of ≤ 50 m adds complexity associated with sensitivities by the individual interpreter. Further, the location of all fault segmentation identified on Throw-Distance plots using the finest line spacing are also observed when 100 m line spacing is used. Hence, interpreting at a finer scale may not necessarily improve the subsurface model and any related analysis, but in fact lead to the production of very rough surfaces, which impacts any further fault analysis. Interpreting on spacing greater than 100 m often leads to overly smoothed fault surfaces that miss details that could be crucial, both for fault seal as well as for fault growth models. Uncertainty in seismic interpretation methodology will follow through to fault seal analysis, specifically for analysis of whether in situ stresses combined with increased pressure through CO2 injection will act to reactivate the faults, leading to up-fault fluid flow/seep. We have shown that changing picking strategies alter the interpreted stability of the fault, where picking with an increased line spacing has shown to increase the overall fault stability. Picking strategy has shown to have minor, although potentially crucial, impact on the predicted Shale Gouge Ratio.

Fault interpretation from high‐resolution seismic data in the northern Negev, Israel

Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 1064-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan Bruner ◽  
Eugeny Landa
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Fault Zones ◽  
Diffracted Waves ◽  
Fault Interpretation ◽  
Low Amplitude ◽  
Seismic Lines ◽  
Sense Reverse

Detection and investigation of fault zones are important tools for tectonic analysis and geological studies. A fault zone inferred on high‐resolution seismic lines has been interpreted using a method of detection of diffracted waves utilizing the main kinematic and dynamic properties of the wavefield. The application of the method to field data from the northern Negev in Israel shows that it provides a good estimate of results and, when used in conjunction with the final stacked data, can give the suspected location of the fault, its sense (reverse or normal), and the amount of “low amplitude” displacement (in an order of the wavelength or even less).

scholarly journals CO2 Storage Site Characterisation using Combined Regional and Detailed Seismic Data: Harvey, Western Australia

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 2896-2905 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ziramov ◽  
M. Urosevic ◽  
S. Glubokovskikh ◽  
R. Pevzner ◽  
K. Tertyshnikov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Western Australia ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Storage Site ◽  
Site Characterisation

scholarly journals Fault interpretation uncertainties using seismic data, and the effects on fault seal analysis: a case study from the Horda Platform, with implications for CO<sub>2</sub> storage

Solid Earth ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1259-1286
Author(s):  
Emma A. H. Michie ◽  
Mark J. Mulrooney ◽  
Alvar Braathen
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Growth Models ◽  
Fault Analysis ◽  
Surface Generation ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Line Spacing ◽  
Fault Growth ◽  
Fault Interpretation

Abstract. Significant uncertainties occur through varying methodologies when interpreting faults using seismic data. These uncertainties are carried through to the interpretation of how faults may act as baffles or barriers, or increase fluid flow. How fault segments are picked when interpreting structures, i.e. which seismic line orientation, bin spacing and line spacing are specified, as well as what surface generation algorithm is used, will dictate how rugose the surface is and hence will impact any further interpretation such as fault seal or fault growth models. We can observe that an optimum spacing for fault interpretation for this case study is set at approximately 100 m, both for accuracy of analysis but also for considering time invested. It appears that any additional detail through interpretation with a line spacing of ≤ 50 m adds complexity associated with sensitivities by the individual interpreter. Further, the locations of all seismic-scale fault segmentation identified on throw–distance plots using the finest line spacing are also observed when 100 m line spacing is used. Hence, interpreting at a finer scale may not necessarily improve the subsurface model and any related analysis but in fact lead to the production of very rough surfaces, which impacts any further fault analysis. Interpreting on spacing greater than 100 m often leads to overly smoothed fault surfaces that miss details that could be crucial, both for fault seal as well as for fault growth models. Uncertainty in seismic interpretation methodology will follow through to fault seal analysis, specifically for analysis of whether in situ stresses combined with increased pressure through CO2 injection will act to reactivate the faults, leading to up-fault fluid flow. We have shown that changing picking strategies alter the interpreted stability of the fault, where picking with an increased line spacing has shown to increase the overall fault stability. Picking strategy has shown to have a minor, although potentially crucial, impact on the predicted shale gouge ratio.

Fault Enhancement Method of Seismic Data

2012 ◽  
Vol 518-523 ◽  
pp. 5640-5643
Author(s):  
Lei Feng ◽  
Guang Ming Li
Keyword(s):  
Image Processing ◽  
Data Acquisition ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Geological Structure ◽  
Seismic Fault ◽  
Important Impact ◽  
Oil Exploitation ◽  
Enhancement Method ◽  
Orientation Information ◽  
Fault Interpretation

With the deepening of the degree of oil exploitation, investigation of geological structure is particularly important, especially those faults that have an important impact on the exploration and development of oil. However, seismic data is affected by various kinds of factors in the progress of data acquisition, which reduces SNR and interfere with the accuracy of geological structure interpretation. This paper based on image processing provides fault enhancement medthod. It can reduce random factors impact and depicte fault more clearly. This method combine anisotropy and orientation information of image, then use generalized Kuwahara filter to enhance fault. This technique has a most important value in seismic fault interpretation.

scholarly journals Fault interpretation in seismic reflection data: an experiment analysing the impact of conceptual model anchoring and vertical exaggeration

Solid Earth ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1651-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Alcalde ◽  
Clare E. Bond ◽  
Gareth Johnson ◽  
Armelle Kloppenburg ◽  
Oriol Ferrer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Seismic Reflection ◽  
Conceptual Models ◽  
Seismic Section ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Interpretation Process ◽  
Fault Interpretation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. The use of conceptual models is essential in the interpretation of reflection seismic data. It allows interpreters to make geological sense of seismic data, which carries inherent uncertainty. However, conceptual models can create powerful anchors that prevent interpreters from reassessing and adapting their interpretations as part of the interpretation process, which can subsequently lead to flawed or erroneous outcomes. It is therefore critical to understand how conceptual models are generated and applied to reduce unwanted effects in interpretation results. Here we have tested how interpretation of vertically exaggerated seismic data influenced the creation and adoption of the conceptual models of 161 participants in a paper-based interpretation experiment. Participants were asked to interpret a series of faults and a horizon, offset by those faults, in a seismic section. The seismic section was randomly presented to the participants with different horizontal–vertical exaggeration (1:4 or 1:2). Statistical analysis of the results indicates that early anchoring to specific conceptual models had the most impact on interpretation outcome, with the degree of vertical exaggeration having a subdued influence. Three different conceptual models were adopted by participants, constrained by initial observations of the seismic data. Interpreted fault dip angles show no evidence of other constraints (e.g. from the application of accepted fault dip models). Our results provide evidence of biases in interpretation of uncertain geological and geophysical data, including the use of heuristics to form initial conceptual models and anchoring to these models, confirming the need for increased understanding and mitigation of these biases to improve interpretation outcomes.

Seismic fault attribute estimation using a local fault model

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. O73-O80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihuai Lou ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Ruiqi Wang ◽  
Tengfei Lin ◽  
Danping Cao
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Seismic Amplitude ◽  
Seismic Fault ◽  
Analysis Window ◽  
Full Analysis ◽  
Fault Interpretation ◽  
Analysis Point ◽  
Staircase Artifacts

Faults in the subsurface can be an avenue of, or a barrier to, hydrocarbon flow and pressure communication. Manual interpretation of discontinuities on 3D seismic amplitude volume is the most common way to define faults within a reservoir. Unfortunately, 3D seismic fault interpretation can be a time-consuming and tedious task. Seismic attributes such as coherence help define faults, but suffer from “staircase” artifacts and nonfault-related stratigraphic discontinuities. We assume that each sample of the seismic data is located at a potential fault plane. The hypothesized fault divides the seismic data centered at the analysis sample into two subwindows. We then compute the coherence for the two subwindows and full analysis window. We repeat the process by rotating the hypothesized fault plane along a set of user-defined discrete fault dip and azimuth. We obtain almost the same coherence values for the subwindows and the full window if the analysis point is not located at a fault plane. The “best” fault plane results in maximum coherence for the subwindows and minimum coherence for the full window if the analysis point is located at a fault plane. To improve the continuity of the fault attributes, we finally smooth the fault probability attribute along the estimated fault plane. We illustrate the effectiveness of our workflow by applying it to a synthetic and two real seismic data. The results indicate that our workflow successfully produces a continuous fault attribute without staircase artifacts and stratigraphic discontinuities.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the reservoir architectural elements in deepwater turbidites of Niger Delta – a case study from the “AFUN” Field

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-108
Author(s):  
Yemisi C. AJISAFE
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Niger Delta ◽  
Architectural Elements ◽  
Structural Style ◽  
Reverse Faulting ◽  
Thrust Zone ◽  
Detailed Interpretation ◽  
Fault Interpretation

3D post-stack time migrated seismic data and a suite of composite well log data from six wells drilled within the “AFUN” field Niger delta were used to effect a detailed interpretation of the field. This was with a view to delineating architectural elements that control reservoir quality of a deepwater turbidite reservoir. The data analyses were done using the Petrel software. LAS file of logs were imported into the Petrel software as well as SEG.Y. seismic data. Fault interpretation and horizon mapping were based on the well-seismic tie from the generated seismogram. Time and depth structure maps were created. Thirty faults which include growth faults, reverse faults, collapsed crest structure and as well as faults that are synthetic and antithetic to the growth faults were mapped. The growth faults are believed to act as pathways for the updip movement of hydrocarbon from the Akata Formation to Agbada Formation. The structural interpretation showed that the area has been subjected to compressional deformation which resulted in reverse faulting system in toe thrust zone influenced by shale diapirs. The maps revealed contour closures that belong to an anticlinal structure which is forming traps in the reservoirs. The structures are faulted North-South trending rollover anticlines. It has also been shown that the distribution and type of architectural elements i.e. fractures within the fan system have major impact upon the reservoir distribution, continuity and connectivity of sand/shale bodies. The study concluded that structural style and facies architecture are the two fundamental elements that defined the reservoir heterogeneity of the “AFUN” Field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document