Self Regulation on Innovative Products Choice

Author(s):  
Paulo Henrique Muller Prado ◽  
Danielle Mantovani Lucena da Silva ◽  
Jose Carlos Korelo

This chapter explores how choice goals influence consumers’ innovativeness in a product category domain. The intentions to adopt new products are guided by promotion and prevention self-regulation systems. Thus, two of the choice goals were classified as promotion goals—justifiability and choice confidence—and two were classified as prevention goals – anticipated regret and evaluation costs. Two groups emerged from the analysis: one named “most innovative” and another called “less innovative.” When comparing the groups, the results show that the “most innovative” cluster demonstrated higher choice confidence, higher justifiability and was more capable of avoiding a possible choice regret. The differences found in the group analysis highlight the need of understanding in further detail how consumers behave during the choice process of innovative products. Therefore, the Regulatory Focus Theory has been shown to be very important for understanding the choice process, especially for the innovation adoption.

Author(s):  
Jose Carlos Korelo ◽  
Danielle Mantovani Lucena da Silva ◽  
Paulo Henrique Muller Prado

Consumer innovativeness is one of the most explored concepts in new product adoption literature. Nevertheless, the intention to adopt novelties, specifically in a product category domain, still needs exploration of what happened during the choice process. Consumers can build their decision about whether to adopt innovation based on their hierarchy of choice goals. The authors propose this hierarchy is driven by the regulatory focus system, based on promotion (justifiability and choice confidence) and prevention goals (anticipated regret and evaluation costs). In order to demonstrate this reasoning, the authors compared “most innovative” versus “less innovative” consumers, regarding their prevention and promotion goals. The most innovative ones demonstrated higher justifiability and choice confidence and showed more capabability of avoiding an anticipated choice regret when compared with the less innovative consumers. The differences explored in the analysis highlight the necessity of further understanding how consumers perform during the choice process of innovative products.


2021 ◽  
pp. 004728752110149
Author(s):  
Hwirim Jo ◽  
Namho Chung ◽  
Sunyoung Hlee ◽  
Chulmo Koo

Despite the revolutionary system of online booking, the decision-making process for booking hotels is still very stressful for customers, who face much uncertainty. The wide range of products and great volume of information result in significant cognitive overload. Therefore, online travel agencies (OTAs) try to reduce customers’ cognitive effort requirements and to induce effective decision making by triggering potential actions through perceived affordance. This study aims to explore the influence of perceived affordance on purchase decisions and postpurchase emotion in the context of OTAs. The findings show that explicit affordance and hidden affordance significantly affect impulsive buying, thus resulting in postpurchase discomfort and regret. Additionally, the outcomes of a multiple group analysis revealed a significant moderating effect of regulatory focus orientation on impulsive buying and postpurchase regret during an overall purchase process involving OTAs.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicenc Fernandez ◽  
Xavier Armengol ◽  
Pep Simo

At present, a large number of theories exist which explain the process for choosing communication media in organizations. Channel expansion theory combines a large part of the theoretical foundation for these theories, suggesting that the perceived richness of a communication medium varies according to experience based on the knowledge of the organization’s members. Equally, Regulatory Focus Theory also suggests that individuals behave in a different way when their self regulation states are different. This investigation intends to present a set of proposals based on the existing literature about how strategy type /focus (promotion and prevention) affects the perception of the richness of a communication medium, increasing the explanatory capacity of channel expansion theory.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Keller ◽  
Ruth Mayo ◽  
Rainer Greifeneder ◽  
Stefan Pfattheicher

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Pandey ◽  
Nikhil Mehta ◽  
Shreya Basu Roy

The semiconductor market has become more competitive than ever before with new players joining the industry. There is pressure for innovation and differentiation in this industry to maintain leadership. The resultant innovative products have wide application but are sold in hypercompetitive market. The industry requires price management at transaction level to achieve efficiency and excellence with each of the diverse customers. The pricing in the semiconductor industry is done more scientifically as compared to other industries like FMCG, consumer durables, and health care. Pricing software aid managers in determining the appropriate price. This research looks holistically at the pricing issues especially faced by market leader with focus on Universal Serial Bus (USB) customers. The market leader traditionally does premium pricing in semiconductor industry. We question that—Should a market leader always charge price premium in all its product lines? Which pricing strategy is better—skimming pricing strategy or penetrative pricing strategy? The objective of the research is to find appropriate pricing strategy for the specific product category. A right price would lead to enhanced revenue besides better customer conversion ratio.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ci-Rong Li ◽  
Chun-Xuan Li ◽  
Chen-Ju Lin

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test how team regulatory focus may relate to individual creativity and team innovation; and address the fit/misfit issue of team regulatory focus and team bureaucracy. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected data from 377 members and their leaders within 56 R&D teams in two Taiwanese companies. Findings A team promotion focus was positively related, whereas a team prevention focus was negatively related, to both team innovation and member creativity through team perspective taking and employee information elaboration, respectively. Furthermore, team bureaucracy played a moderating role that suppressed the indirect relationship between team regulatory focus and creativity. Originality/value This is one of first studies to explore an underlying mechanism linking team regulatory focus and both team innovation and member creativity. The authors provide a more complete view of the creative and innovation implications of team-level self-regulation.


1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla A. Labarbera

The author investigates the effectiveness of selected credibility enhancement devices in increasing the intent to purchase a brand which has a unique attribute, but is advertised by a firm with no reputation in the specific product category. The credibility enhancers tested are documentation of advertising claims, advertising self-regulation, and government regulation. Findings of the study demonstrate that implementation of these credibility enhancers can be valuable in bolstering a firm's influence and overcoming a no-reputation liability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document