Risk Management Metrics

2022 ◽  
pp. 56-66
Author(s):  
Rimsy Dua ◽  
Samiksha Sharma ◽  
Rohit Kumar

This chapter describes how risk management deals with the detection, the evaluation and the precedence of the risks in the process of project management. There is always an uncertainty factor related to the decisions of an investment while managing a project. Risk management is a proactive approach to deal with such future events that can lead to slow performance of the software project management. For successful risk management; there are different metrics that have been used in the past and are being getting used in the present for inspecting the progress of a project at specific points in a timeline that help in reducing the amount of risk. For the adoption of effective metrics for risk management, data is required. All of the metrics can be applied to the different domains of project, process and product. The chapter also covers strategies to advance, distinguish, estimate, and forecast the risk management process. A review of the key point indicators (KPIs) are also integrated along with the project metrics to signify the future and the present renderings.

Author(s):  
Rimsy Dua ◽  
Samiksha Sharma ◽  
Rohit Kumar

This chapter describes how risk management deals with the detection, the evaluation and the precedence of the risks in the process of project management. There is always an uncertainty factor related to the decisions of an investment while managing a project. Risk management is a proactive approach to deal with such future events that can lead to slow performance of the software project management. For successful risk management; there are different metrics that have been used in the past and are being getting used in the present for inspecting the progress of a project at specific points in a timeline that help in reducing the amount of risk. For the adoption of effective metrics for risk management, data is required. All of the metrics can be applied to the different domains of project, process and product. The chapter also covers strategies to advance, distinguish, estimate, and forecast the risk management process. A review of the key point indicators (KPIs) are also integrated along with the project metrics to signify the future and the present renderings.


Author(s):  
Muhammad T. Hatamleh

The majority of the approaches to managing project risk follow the logic of process groups. Project Management Institute (PMI) has 29 tools and techniques related to risk management process groups. Consequently, engineering and business schools have been accused of educating managers with sharp analytical skills but little understanding of social problems. The literature suggests that too much attention is focused on learning the techniques and formalities of risk management but not enough on the advanced issues of management. Also, the literature argues that there are two approaches to project management (hard and soft). The hard side only covers part of the managerial aspects which helps to manage foreseeable uncertainties. However, unforeseeable uncertainties need skills that related to soft side approaches such as emotional intelligence, navigating the organization’s culture, risk attitude, participative leadership style, and managing the relationship with stakeholders. This study provides an intensive review of the literature to discuss the need for integrating the hard and soft sides of management to achieve an effective risk management process. In addition, it proposes a conceptual framework that provides guidelines to enhance overall risk management efficiency.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmar Kutsch ◽  
Mark Hall

The management of risk is considered a key discipline by the Project Management Institute and the Association for Project Management. However, knowledge of what needs to be done frequently fails to result in action consistent with that knowledge. The reasons for this seem to have received little attention. This study researched the degree of use of project risk management and barriers that prevent IT project managers from using risk management. Interviews and a survey were carried out. The results show that, in one-third of cases, because of the problem of cost justification, no formal project risk management process was applied.


2011 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Qin Liang ◽  
Shi Cong Hong

The project carrying on in the complex environment was affected by many factors. Project risk management is to manage the uncertainty elements in the process of project development to realize the smoothly running of the project. This paper provided the process method carried on the control to each type of resources in risk management investment in the project risk management process, built up process method in controlling project risk to reduce the threat that risk brings to the project, and attained the lowest damage of the project. Consecutively, risk management can be made to become one of the core parts in project management by excavating the project potential opportunities.


Author(s):  
Maciej Brzozowski

The main purpose of the paper is to examine, on the basis of empirical research, the perceived manner of project management in organizations, as well as to determine the frequency of application of selected project management methodologies, in addition to the assessment of their usefulness for project risk management. The first part of the paper presents - identified on the basis of literature studies - types and examples of project management methodologies along with basic assumptions of the project risk management process, and in the second part - the results of empirical research conducted by recourse to a questionnaire among the participants of projects implemented in various types of organizations. The study showed that in organizations employing respondents, the methodical manner of project management is most often used, while the most popular project management methodologies were PMBoK, Agile and PRINCE2, wherein respondents highly rated the usefulness of selected methodologies for effective project risk management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Evelina Parashkevova

The article focuses on issues related to agile project management, the integration of risk management into the project management process, and some contributing points of the agile methodology to improving the effectiveness of the project management process. Risk is presented as an unforeseen event that may have a positive or negative impact on project goals. The main advantage of agile risk management in a project is highlighted. The article also presents basic standards and methodologies for project management. Opportunities for applying the values and principles of flexible methodology in the risk management process are outlined. The main advantages of the flexible project management methodology are presented, focusing on the relationship with risk management. The introduction of agile project management as a methodology in organizations poses new challenges to risk management. Although some of the conventional methods can be applied, it is important to take into account the specific characteristics of the agile methodology. This implies a more dynamic application of a set of methods and techniques for identifying, analyzing, assessing, and affecting risk. An important factor in managing risk when applying the agile methodology is to identify the positively influencing unforeseen factors and accordingly to benefit from their favorable effects on project and organizational goals, i.e. a wider definition of risk associated with unforeseen circumstances, positive or negative, which arise in the course of project implementation is adopted here. This unconventional view allows for a higher value of project outcomes and effects as a consequence of emerging risks that have a positive impact on project goals. It is not possible for risk management to be a process independent of the project management process. Although in conventional risk management methodologies management is part of the project management, with agile methodology, things are slightly different. This is because agile project management methodology does not apply standardized processes and procedures. It leaves a project to develop naturally and in line with stakeholders’ requirements. Risk management consists of a particular sequence of activities applicable to both traditional and agile project management. The process includes as follows: risk identification, assessment and analysis, developing response strategies, monitoring and reporting. These activities, performed in a short timeframe and towards specific, simple and clear tasks, lead to significant reduction of the negative project risk and contribute to the occurrence of positive unforeseen events. It is important to note that risk management is thus simplified and becomes a much easier to be understood and properly implemented process by anyone involved in project implementation. Reducing the cost of risk management is a major asset of agile project management. Preliminary control is sporadic, with emphasis on early diagnosis and agile response. All this makes the agile project management methodology and risk management in a dynamic project environment more and more up to date.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Firmenich

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to emphasise on the need for efficient and effective project risk management practices and to support project managers in increasing the cost certainty of projects by proposing a new framework for project risk management. Design/methodology/approach The author adopts a “constructivist” methodology, drawing on practices common in construction management sciences and new institutional economics. Findings The author presents a holistic and customisable project risk management framework that is grounded in both practice and academia. The framework is holistic because, amongst others, all steps of the typical risk management process are addressed. The framework is customisable, because it allows for alternative ways of implementing the project risk management steps depending on the project-specific circumstances. Research limitations/implications The framework does not address the potential unwillingness of the project players to set up a project risk management process, at all. The proposed framework has not yet been tested empirically. Future research will seek to validate the framework. Originality/value The framework is designed to account for the difficult circumstances of a complex construction project. It is intended to support decision makers in customising a practical yet comprehensive project risk management concept to the characteristics of the unique project. Although many other project risk management concepts are designed based on the assumption that actors are perfectly rational and informed, this framework’s design is based on the opposite assumption. The framework is dynamic and should adapt over time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Kiełbus ◽  
Dariusz Karpisz

AbstractThe article presents the essence and significance of risk management processes in the project, as the key field for successful completion of the project, in the field of project management. Based on literature review, the methods and standards of risk management in the project as well as standards related to process safety were defined. The risk management process according to the PMBoK methodology was discussed as an example of an international project entitled 3DCentral – Catalyzing Smart Engineering and Rapid Prototyping.


2018 ◽  
pp. 748-770
Author(s):  
Ursula Kopp

Although various tools are available to support the risk management process, difficulties are encountered when project risk management is carried out in practice. It occasionally seems difficult for project managers to grasp the whole complexity of a project, identify the essential risks and react accordingly. The aim of this chapter is to introduce a tool that can help managers identify project risks, learn about their dynamics within the project and, consequently, formulate better ideas of how to address the risks. Project Risk Constellations are the spatial representations of explicit and implicit knowledge of the relationships, orders, hierarchies, dependencies and communication patterns of a project. They provide multi-dimensional and multi-layered information and reveal deeply rooted mechanisms. They quickly enable project managers to better understand the dynamics of their project, the intended and unintended impacts, ambiguities as well as project risks and uncertainties.


Author(s):  
Ursula Kopp

Although various tools are available to support the risk management process, difficulties are encountered when project risk management is carried out in practice. It occasionally seems difficult for project managers to grasp the whole complexity of a project, identify the essential risks and react accordingly. The aim of this chapter is to introduce a tool that can help managers identify project risks, learn about their dynamics within the project and, consequently, formulate better ideas of how to address the risks. Project Risk Constellations are the spatial representations of explicit and implicit knowledge of the relationships, orders, hierarchies, dependencies and communication patterns of a project. They provide multi-dimensional and multi-layered information and reveal deeply rooted mechanisms. They quickly enable project managers to better understand the dynamics of their project, the intended and unintended impacts, ambiguities as well as project risks and uncertainties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document