Construction Safety Management from Perspective of Stakeholders

2013 ◽  
Vol 438-439 ◽  
pp. 1634-1636
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang

China is one of the most countries that invest considerable money on fundamental construction. How to reduce the occurrence of safe accidents and ensure the realization of construction safety has become focus of the whole society. In the perspectives of stakeholders, the construction project stakeholders can be divided into core layer, strategic layer and outer circle layer from three dimensions of qualitative analysis and judgment. Some effective suggestions for construction safety management are put forward.

Author(s):  
Adwitya Bhaskara ◽  
Cahyo Dita Saputro ◽  
Firdamarsha Benadikta ◽  
Syawaluddin Alim ◽  
Danny Setiawan

In mid-2019, there was a construction accident during the underpass construction project in Yogyakarta. The underpass excavation wall in this project was collapsed and 2 vehicles were reported fallen. Although such accident sometimes occurs in some projects, it does not mean that these accidents are caused by the same source. Many efforts to prevent accidents have been done by various methods and one of them is an assessment by observation at construction sites referring to Government Regulation 05 2014 concerning SMK3 (Occupational Safety and Health Management System) in the Public Works Sector Construction. The details about the implementation of construction work are described in PUPR Decree No. 21 in 2019 in term of the Construction Safety Management System (SMKK) Guidelines. This research was conducted to identify factors and indicators of management consultants, supervisors and contractors who have a major impact and contribution to the underpass construction project in Kentungan, Yogyakarta. The percentage level of accuracy in the application of the construction safety management system based on the assessment of the contractor was 85.938% and for the supervisory consultant the percentage level of accuracy was 97.29%. Both percentages are included in the satisfactory category since the assessment ranges are between 85% and 100%. Based on these two assessments, an evaluation was carried out using a Fault Tree Analysis to determine the causality flow of construction accidents.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Adwitya Bhaskara ◽  
Cahyo Dita Saputro ◽  
Abul Fida Ismaili ◽  
Nia Agustin ◽  
Syawaluddin Alim

The case of construction accident that occurred mid-2019 and seized a lot of attention in the surrounding community is a construction accident on the implementation of underpass construction project located in Yogyakarta. The underpass excavation wall in this project collapsed then led two vehicles are fall. Although the types of accidents are almost identical to each project, it does not mean that the same reason causes the accidents. Various methods can carry out efforts to prevent work accidents, one of which is with assessment method and risk analysis using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) which sub indicators are determined using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). The method conducted with a review in the site by referring to Ministerial Regulation No. 21 year 2019 about the SMKK (Construction Safety Management System) guidelines. This research was conducted to identify the factors and indicators of management of thesupervisory consultant and the contractor. They had a significant influence and contribution to the implementation of the Yogyakarta Kentungan Underpass construction project. The results of this early-stage study served into two outcomes. First, the accuracy of the implementation of construction safety management system based on the assessment of the contractor is 85.938% and the percentage level of accuracy of the supervisory consultant is 97.29%. Both percentages fall into the category of Satisfactory Implementation Assessment because the valuation range is included between 85% to 100%. Second, after analyzing the risk using AHP method, the indicator that is used as a reference priority for the construction safety system of underpass construction projects and has the highest risk level that can causean underpass project construction accident from the contractor's point of view is the sub-indicator of supporting facilities and infrastructure with a risk level value of 0.042 whereas from the supervisory consultant’ perspective is the sub-indicator about to measuring the dimensions of the road building installed in the site with a risk level value of 0.052.


2012 ◽  
Vol 174-177 ◽  
pp. 2867-2870
Author(s):  
Jianliang Zhou ◽  
Danqi Liang ◽  
Li Dong

It is necessary for the whole project stakeholders to improve the level of construction safety management, which includes the owner, designer, contractor, construction supervisor, government regulators and other parties. With respect to the research about construction project safety, existing literatures mainly consider about contractor, construction supervisor and other parties. However, Design stage is the key point of affecting the construction safety management and more attention should be paid. Design stage provides the basis to control the project safety risks in construction stage. Aiming to give better play for designers in construction safety management, this paper probed project safety management system, suggested the approach of designer roles in construction project safety management, analyzed the challenges if designer took part in construction safety management, and gave some countermeasures on how to take advantage of the designer in improving the level of construction safety.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-75
Author(s):  
Riyan Riski Kurniawan ◽  
Adwitya Bhaskara

ABSTRACT   Construction project of building frequently has risk. Often occurring risk often is job accident. Job accident may be one of causes inhibiting project job activity. According to the data of Social Health Organizing Agency for labor, the job accident rate was 130.926 in 2017. Application of a good Construction Safety Management System is expectable to minimize resulting risk probability. This study used method of Danger Identification and Opportunity Risk Assessment (IBPRP) and Job Safety Analysis (JSA) deriving from PURR Government Regulation Number 21/2019. This study aimed at finding IBPRP and JSA designs as well as analogy of problem identification and control variables of foundation job in the Construction Project of Learning Service Building (FISIP) of General Soedirman University of Purworejo. The results of IBPRP and JSA analysis indicated that risk identification and risk rate of foundation job in construction project of Learning Service Building (FISIP) of General Soedirman University of Purwokerto, the foundation job had 48 risks identified from 11 job sequences. All of the 49 identified risks were in low risk rate, where rate value of matrix 2 (two) and 14 risks had rate value of matrix 4 (four).   Keywords: Construction Safety Management System (SMKK), risk, risk rate, risk matrix, IBPRP, JSA.


Sensors ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyuan Zhang ◽  
Tianzhuo Cao ◽  
Xuefeng Zhao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document