Applying Group Decision Making and Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods in Business Processes

2014 ◽  
Vol 693 ◽  
pp. 237-242
Author(s):  
Kateřina Kashi ◽  
Jiří Franek
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Multiple Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Multiple Attribute

The aim of this applied research is to focus on real-life application of multiple attribute decision making (MADM) methods and their adaptation in a way which can be acceptable for business practice. The study will apply the group decision making methods on a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a type of performance measurement and strategic decision making. The study is mainly concerned with multiple criteria decomposition method of analytic network process (ANP) method, WINGS technique and entropy. This group of methods had been already applied in several business domains. However, majority of the implementation was only presented as an example how it could work in practice, but they were not investigated from the perspective of how much information they could provide to the management. In this paper, proposed methods will be used to determine which criteria are most important for the company within the Balanced Scorecard and results of all methods will be compared. The aim of this study is, by utilizing group MADM approach, to discover the areas of the BSC which must be improved so that a total performance increases.

scholarly journals Group Decision Making Based on Triangular Neutrosophic Cubic Fuzzy Einstein Hybrid Weighted Averaging Operators

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliya Fahmi ◽  
Fazli Amin ◽  
Madad Khan ◽  
Florentin Smarandache
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Numbers ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Multiple Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Weighted Averaging ◽  
Averaging Operators ◽  
Ordered Weighted Averaging ◽  
Multiple Attribute

In this paper, a new concept of the triangular neutrosophic cubic fuzzy numbers (TNCFNs), their score and accuracy functions are introduced. Based on TNCFNs, some new Einstein aggregation operators, such as the triangular neutrosophic cubic fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging (TNCFEWA), triangular neutrosophic cubic fuzzy Einstein ordered weighted averaging (TNCFEOWA) and triangular neutrosophic cubic fuzzy Einstein hybrid weighted averaging (TNCFEHWA) operators are developed. Furthermore, their application to multiple-attribute decision-making with triangular neutrosophic cubic fuzzy (TNCF) information is discussed. Finally, a practical example is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.

scholarly journals Group Decision Making using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Matrix and Confident Weight of Experts

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujit Das ◽  
Samarjit Kar ◽  
Tandra Pal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Soft Sets ◽  
Soft Matrix ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Interval Valued

Abstract This article proposes an algorithmic approach for multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrix (IVIFSM) and confident weight of experts. We propose a novel concept for assigning confident weights to the experts based on cardinals of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets (IVIFSSs). The confident weight is assigned to each of the experts based on their preferred attributes and opinions, which reduces the chances of biasness. Instead of using medical knowledgebase, the proposed algorithm mainly relies on the set of attributes preferred by the group of experts. To make the set of preferred attributes more important, we use combined choice matrix, which is combined with the individual IVIFSM to produce the corresponding product IVIFSM. This article uses IVIFSMs for representing the experts’ opinions. IVIFSM is the matrix representation of IVIFSS and IVIFSS is a natural combination of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set (IVIFS) and soft set. Finally, the performance of the proposed algorithm is validated using a case study from real life

scholarly journals Fermatean fuzzy linguistic weighted averaging/geometric operators based on modified operational laws and their application in multiple attribute group decision-making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajkumar Verma
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Weighted Averaging ◽  
Scale Function ◽  
Operational Laws ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Linguistic Scale Function ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic

Fermatean fuzzy linguistic (FFL) set theory provides an efficient tool for modeling a higher level of uncertain and imprecise information, which cannot be represented using intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic (IFL)/Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic (PFL) sets. On the other hand, the linguistic scale function is the better way to consider the semantics of the linguistic terms during the evaluation process. In the present paper, we first define some new modified operational laws for Fermatean fuzzy linguistic numbers (FFLNs) based on linguistic scale function (LSF) to overcome the shortcomings of the existing operational laws and prove some important mathematical properties of them. Based on it, the work defines several new aggregation operators (AOs), namely, the FFL-weighted averaging (FFLWA) operator, the FFL-weighted geometric (FFLWG) operator, the FFL-ordered weighted averaging (FFLOWA) operator, the FFL-ordered weighted geometric (FFLOWG) operator, the FFL-hybrid averaging (FFLHA) operator and the FFL-hybrid geometric (FFLHG) operator under FFL environment. Several properties of these AOs are investigated in detail. Further, based on these operators, a multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) approach with FFL information is developed. Finally, to illustrate the effectiveness of the present approach, a real-life supplier selection problem is presented where the evaluation information of the alternatives is given in terms of FFLNs.

Method for Two-People Multiple-Attribute Decision Making and its Application

2011 ◽  
Vol 204-210 ◽  
pp. 2061-2064
Author(s):  
Fang Wei Zhang ◽  
Shi He Xu ◽  
Bao Shi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Evidence Theory ◽  
Multiple Attribute Decision Making ◽  
New Method ◽  
Multiple Attribute

In this paper we study the multi-attribute group decision-making problems and put forward a kind of method. In this method, based on clustering evidence theory, the decision-making information is translated into evidences to support different decision-making program. Then, by the amount of evidences, decision-making program ranking is completed. The method’s character can not only rank the decision-making programs by their merits, but also give each program the probability to be the best. Finally, an example is given to show the rationality and effectiveness of the new method.

scholarly journals AN APPROACH TO GROUP DECISION MAKING BASED ON 2-DIMENSION UNCERTAIN LINGUISTIC INFORMATION

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peide Liu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Multiple Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Maximum Deviation ◽  
Linguistic Variables ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Attribute Weights ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Evaluation Information

Based on the definition of 2-dimension linguistic information of multiple attribute decision making problems proposed by Zhu, Zhou and Yang (2009), the information on evaluation is extended to 2-dimension uncertain linguistic variables, and a new method is proposed to solve the multiple-attribute group decision making problems in which the attribute values take the form of 2-dimension uncertain linguistic variables and the attribute weights are unknown. Firstly, the II class of uncertain linguistic information is transformed into the subjective weights of the experts, and then the subjective weights, the similarity degree of experts’ evaluation information and authority weights are aggregated to the comprehensive weights of each expert. By the comprehensive weights, the group decision making matrix is produced by weighting evaluation information of each expert. Then the maximum deviation method is used to calculate the attribute weights and TOPSIS method is proposed to rank the alternatives. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the decision-making steps and the effectiveness of this method.

scholarly journals Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making process based on Generalized Archimedean Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy  Averaging Aggregation Operators

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajkumar Verma ◽  
Niti Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Weighted Averaging ◽  
Pythagorean Fuzzy Set ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Fuzzy Aggregation ◽  
Linguistic Scale Function

Abstract The linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy set (LPFS) is a prominent tool for comprehensively representing qualitative information data. Aggregation operators (AOs) play an essential role in multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems. In the present manuscript, we define four new operational laws for linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (LPFNs) based on Archimedean t-norm and t-conorm. Paper also uses the linguistic scale function (LSF) in order to accommodate different semantic situations during the operational process. Next, we introduce some new generalized arithmetic AOs, including the generalized Archimedean linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted averaging (GALPFWA) operator, the generalized Archimedean linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy ordered weighted averaging (GALPFOWA) operator, the generalized Archimedean linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy hybrid averaging (GALPFHA) operator along with their desirable properties. The developed AOs include several existing linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators as their particular and limiting cases. Finally, using the proposed AOs, a new approach for solving the MAGDM problem is given and illustrated with a real-life numerical example to demonstrate its flexibility and effectiveness.

scholarly journals Intuitionistic Unbalanced Linguistic Generalized Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making and Its Application to Green Products Selection

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Bing Han ◽  
Zhifu Tao ◽  
Huayou Chen ◽  
Ligang Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Multiple Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Green Products ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Parameter Values ◽  
Heronian Mean

In many countries, green products play a critical role in energy recycling and environment protection. The selection of green products can be regarded as a multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problem. Due to the complexity and uncertainty of the problem, decision makers may give their personal preference values to different attributes of alternatives by intuitionistic unbalanced linguistic term sets. The main purpose of this paper is to put forward a new generalized multiple attribute group decision making (GMAGDM) approach based on the intuitionistic unbalanced linguistic dependent weighted generalized Heronian mean (IULDWGHM) operator and the intuitionistic unbalanced linguistic dependent weighted generalized geometric Heronian mean (IULDWGGHM) operator. The proposed method can not only relieve the influence of unfair assessments, but also consider the interaction effects of attributes. Furthermore, the appropriate parameter values and operators can be selected to meet the different risk preference of decision makers and actual requirements. Finally, a green products selection case is given to illustrate the effectiveness and universality of the developed approach.

scholarly journals Public Transportation Hub Location with Stochastic Demand: An Improved Approach Based on Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Liu ◽  
Zhilan Song ◽  
Shuqi Zhong
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Public Transportation ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Hub Location ◽  
Hub Location Problem ◽  
The Public ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Qualitative Factors

Urban public transportation hubs are the key nodes of the public transportation system. The location of such hubs is a combinatorial problem. Many factors can affect the decision-making of location, including both quantitative and qualitative factors; however, most current research focuses solely on either the quantitative or the qualitative factors. Little has been done to combine these two approaches. To fulfill this gap in the research, this paper proposes a novel approach to the public transportation hub location problem, which takes both quantitative and qualitative factors into account. In this paper, an improved multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) method based on TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and deviation is proposed to convert the qualitative factors of each hub into quantitative evaluation values. A location model with stochastic passenger flows is then established based on the above evaluation values. Finally, stochastic programming theory is applied to solve the model and to determine the location result. A numerical study shows that this approach is applicable and effective.

CPT-MABAC method for spherical fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and its application to green supplier selection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Huiyuan Zhang ◽  
Guiwu Wei ◽  
Xudong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Comparison Method ◽  
Entropy Method ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Psychological Perceptions

The green supplier selection is one of the popular multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems. The spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) can fully express the complexity and fuzziness of evaluation information for green supplier selection. Furthermore, the classic MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) method based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT-MABAC) is designed, which is an optional method in reflecting the psychological perceptions of decision makers (DMs). Therefore, in this article, we propose a spherical fuzzy CPT-MABAC (SF-CPT-MABAC) method for MAGDM issues. Meanwhile, considering the different preferences of DMs to attribute sets, we obtain the objective weights of attributes through entropy method. Focusing on the current popular problems, this paper applies the proposed method for green supplier selection and proves for green supplier selection based on SF-CPT-MABAC method. Finally, by comparing existing methods, the effectiveness of the proposed method is certified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document