Applications of Interaction Design on the Website Interface Design

2012 ◽  
Vol 468-471 ◽  
pp. 378-381
Author(s):  
Bei Hu
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Interaction Design ◽  
Interface Design ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Interface Element

The text explains why the process of website interface design wants to involve the interaction design through the own perspective. It also explains what interaction design exactly is on the easily understand way. It mainly demonstrates the design principles of interface, and how to use them correctly in the process of designing. And mentions lots of problems may happen to the process. Its purpose is clear that according to the design principles of interface element in the website interface design process, standing in a higher level to review the interface design to work for the success of website interface design.

Developing Design Requirements from Cognitive Task Data: Replacing Magic with Methodology

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-294
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Hale ◽  
Anna L. Rowe
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Interaction Design ◽  
Interface Design ◽  
Design Problem ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Ecological Interface Design ◽  
Engineering Data ◽  
User Data ◽  
Design Requirements

This symposium addresses the challenge of translating user data to specifications suitable for interface development. Four methodologies will be presented: Decision requirements tables, ecological interface design, object-view and interaction design and procedural networks. These four methodologies will be contrasted relative to three dimensions: (1) type of data used in analysis, (2) point in the design process at which each methodology focuses its impact and (3) the formalisms each uses for translating psychological data into engineering data suitable for specification development. Our introductory remarks will elaborate on these three dimensions, and present an example design problem. The four session participants then will present their respective methodologies, how each addresses the three dimensions and how each can be used to address the example design problem.

Study of Point to Point Self-Service Travel Site Iterative Interaction Design Based on User Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 411-414 ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Jin Sheng Lu ◽  
Jun Jun Shen ◽  
Zhong Liang Yang
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Process Design ◽  
Interaction Design ◽  
Interface Design ◽  
Prototype System ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Design Elements ◽  
Self Service ◽  
Point To Point

The user experience iterative process in interface design cannot meet the needs of point to point cases information delivery. In this paper, the process which combined with modern semiotics design methods was re-designed. With the process, design elements were refined in semiotics and the workflows and frames were recreated. And the point to point iterative interaction design process based on user experience were proposed through the interaction design of Kashgar self-service tourism website and developed the prototype system, which verified the practical application of the availability and effectiveness of the new design process.

User Interface Design Principles for Interaction Design

Design Issues ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adream Blair-Early ◽  
Mike Zender
Keyword(s):  
User Interface ◽  
Interaction Design ◽  
Interface Design ◽  
User Interface Design ◽  
Design Principles

scholarly journals Working with patients and the public to design an electronic health record interface: a qualitative mixed-methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh R. Warren ◽  
Matthew Harrison ◽  
Sonal Arora ◽  
Ara Darzi
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Interface Design ◽  
Participatory Design ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Health Record ◽  
The Public ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Background Enabling patients to be active users of their own medical records may promote the delivery of safe, efficient care across settings. Patients are rarely involved in designing digital health record systems which may make them unsuitable for patient use. We aimed to develop an evidence-based electronic health record (EHR) interface and participatory design process by involving patients and the public. Methods Participants were recruited to multi-step workshops involving individual and group design activities. A mixture of quantitative and qualitative questionnaires and observational methods were used to collect participant perspectives on interface design and feedback on the workshop design process. Results 48 recruited participants identified several design principles and components of a patient-centred electronic medical record interface. Most participants indicated that an interactive timeline would be an appropriate way to depict a medical history. Several key principles and design components, including the use of specific colours and shapes for clinical events, were identified. Participants found the workshop design process utilised to be useful, interesting, enjoyable and beneficial to their understanding of the challenges of information exchange in healthcare. Conclusion Patients and the public should be involved in EHR interface design if these systems are to be suitable for use by patient-users. Workshops, as used in this study, can provide an engaging format for patient design input. Design principles and components highlighted in this study should be considered when patient-facing EHR design interfaces are being developed.

scholarly journals Unifying Functional User Interface Design Principles

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-67
Author(s):  
Jenny Ruiz ◽  
Estefanía Serral ◽  
Monique Snoeck
Keyword(s):  
User Interface ◽  
Interface Design ◽  
User Interface Design ◽  
Design Principles

scholarly journals REVIEW OF DESIGN HEURISTICS AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2571-2580
Author(s):  
Filip Valjak ◽  
Angelica Lindwall
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Heuristics ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Support Methods

AbstractThe advent of additive manufacturing (AM) in recent years have had a significant impact on the design process. Because of new manufacturing technology, a new area of research emerged – Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) with newly developed design support methods and tools. This paper looks into the current status of the field regarding the conceptual design of AM products, with the focus on how literature sources treat design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM. To answer the research question, a systematic literature review was conducted. The results are analysed, compared and discussed on three main points: the definition of the design heuristics and the design principles, level of support they provide, as well as where and how they are used inside the design process. The paper highlights the similarities and differences between design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM.

scholarly journals Should my robot know what's best for me? Human–robot interaction between user experience and ethical design

AI & Society ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Fronemann ◽  
Kathrin Pollmann ◽  
Wulf Loh
Keyword(s):  
User Experience ◽  
Interaction Design ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Human Robot Interaction ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Original Design ◽  
Robot Interaction ◽  
Ethical Design

AbstractTo integrate social robots in real-life contexts, it is crucial that they are accepted by the users. Acceptance is not only related to the functionality of the robot but also strongly depends on how the user experiences the interaction. Established design principles from usability and user experience research can be applied to the realm of human–robot interaction, to design robot behavior for the comfort and well-being of the user. Focusing the design on these aspects alone, however, comes with certain ethical challenges, especially regarding the user’s privacy and autonomy. Based on an example scenario of human–robot interaction in elder care, this paper discusses how established design principles can be used in social robotic design. It then juxtaposes these with ethical considerations such as privacy and user autonomy. Combining user experience and ethical perspectives, we propose adjustments to the original design principles and canvass our own design recommendations for a positive and ethically acceptable social human–robot interaction design. In doing so, we show that positive user experience and ethical design may be sometimes at odds, but can be reconciled in many cases, if designers are willing to adjust and amend time-tested design principles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document