Conceptual Framework for Green Affordable Home in Malaysia

2013 ◽  
Vol 689 ◽  
pp. 86-89
Author(s):  
Masitah Binti Zulkepli ◽  
Ibrahim Bin Sipan ◽  
Jibril Danazimi Jibril
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Energy Efficiency ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Green Building ◽  
Residential Construction ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Green Criteria

In recent years, interests and activities related to green building has increased. As stakeholders such as builders, architects, and developers have moved towards implementing green building criteria and sub criteria of energy efficiency and the greater usage of reuse and recycled materials in developing homes. The benefits of this transition also influenced the development of affordable homes. In Malaysia, green building for new residential construction consists of six criteria. However the green building criteria are not focusing on affordable home as in Green Communities in US, Eco Homes in UK and Ecocents Living in Australia. Indeed, they have their own green criteria and sub criteria as a means and guidelines for green affordable home development. This paper aims to perceive the criteria and sub criteria of green building which correspond to the types of affordable home in respect to local condition within Malaysia. This research will utilize the Delphi Hierarchy Process (DHP) methodology which integrates the delphi method with the analytic hierarchy process. It assists the expert panels to systematically identify the green affordable home criteria and sub criteria. The findings proposed in this research will be DHP decision model for green affordable home in Malaysia as a tool for decision making for developers in green affordable home development. It is hoped that this study will help to cater the issues of affordable homes as well as environmental with implementation of green building criteria and sub criteria into affordable home in Malaysia.

Research on Decision of ANP-Based Enterprise Software Outsourcing Alliance

2010 ◽  
Vol 143-144 ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Wang ◽  
Shi Lei Sun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Indicator System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Software Outsourcing ◽  
Software Market ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Outsourcing Decision ◽  
Hierarchy Process

With outsourcing and the software market competition intensifies, software alliance and outsourcing of the organization for the enterprise, scientific, reasonable assessment software alliance ability outsourcing decision to build a key factor is the prerequisite for business to obtain continuous competition advantages of decision-making. to provide the basis of the resources of studies on the basis of ability, the enterprise, from the background, the core, trust control mechanism and coalition partners four an alliance decision-making body of appraisal target.(ANP) constructs ability software outsourcing alliance decision model based on the indicator system using the analytic hierarchy process, and unifies the example utilization super decision-making (Super Dicisions, called SD) the software confirmation model.

Developing a Decision Model for Selecting the Scripts of Trendy Taiwanese Dramas

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-51
Author(s):  
Pi-Fang Hsu ◽  
Hua-Lin Yang
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Evaluative Criteria ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The script of a drama is key to achieving an outstanding performance. This study develops a new model for selecting the scripts of Taiwanese dramas based on the production manager's perceptions. First, the proposed model adopts the modified delphi method to determine suitable evaluative criteria for the scripts of contemporary Taiwanese dramas. Next, the model applies the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the relative weights of evaluative criteria, thereafter rating the alternatives and selecting the best script. Additionally, a Taiwanese company is used how the scripts of Taiwanese dramas can be selected using this model. The results indicate that important criteria, in order of important, are characteristics of the story, the subject matter of the script, the meaning of the words, and the scriptwriter. The proposed model helps companies to effectively select the scripts of Taiwanese dramas, making it highly applicable for academia and commerce.

scholarly journals A review on multi-criteria decision-making for energy efficiency in automotive engineering

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Djan Magalhaes Castro ◽  
Fernando Silv Parreiras
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Energy Efficiency ◽  
Automotive Industry ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Fuzzy Methods ◽  
Full Compliance ◽  
Common Technique ◽  
The Common ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Governments around the world instituted guidelines for calculating energy efficiency of vehicles not only by models, but by the whole universe of new vehicles registered. This paper compiles Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) studies related to automotive industry. We applied a Systematic Literature Review on MCDM studies published until 2015 to identify patterns on MCDM applications to design vehicles more fuel efficient in order to achieve full compliance with energy efficiency guidelines (e.g., Inovar-Auto). From 339 papers, 45 papers have been identified as describing some MCDM technique and correlation to automotive industry. We classified the most common MCDM technique and application in the automotive industry. Integrated approaches were more usual than individual ones. Application of fuzzy methods to tackle uncertainties in the data was also observed. Despite the maturity in the use of MCDM in several areas of knowledge, and intensive use in the automotive industry, none of them are directly linked to car design for energy efficiency. Analytic Hierarchy Process was identified as the common technique applied in the automotive industry.

scholarly journals Smart and Green Buildings Features in the Decision-Making Hierarchy of Office Space Tenants: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gluszak ◽  
Gawlik ◽  
Zieba
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Green Building ◽  
Real Estate Market ◽  
Technological Advancement ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Sustainable Building ◽  
Office Market ◽  
Hierarchy Process

In the paper, we investigate the role of smart building or green building innovations on the Polish real estate market using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method on the group of experts (consultants, managers, brokers) that are active on the office market in Krakow (study area). The findings point towards the highest relevance of the localisation factor, but also at the relatively low importance of the features of a sustainable building: building automation and information technology systems, as well as energy efficiency or certification. The findings suggest that despite the growing interest in sustainability and technological advancement amongst office market participants in Krakow, the relative importance of smart and green building features in their decision-making processes is relatively low. The study has some interesting practical implications. The knowledge regarding the relative importance of decision criteria can be valuable for developers and investors because the anticipation of tenants’ expectations is directly linked with return on investment and innovation premiums.

Comparison among Original AHP, Ideal AHP and Moderate AHP Models

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Marimuthu ◽  
G. Ramesh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Decisions always involve the getting the best solution, selecting the suitable experiments, most appropriate judgments, taking the quality results etc., using some techniques.  Every decision making can be considered as the choice from the set of alternatives based on a set of criteria.  The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a multi-criteria decision making and is dealing with decision making problems through pairwise comparisons.  This paper is concerned with the moderate AHP decision model is always same as the original AHP decision model.  It does not violate the rule itself.

On Moderate Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Pairwise Comparison Model With Subcriteria

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
G. Marimuthu ◽  
G. Ramesh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Decision Models ◽  
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Comparison Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Decisions usually involve the getting the best solution, selecting the suitable experiments, most appropriate judgments, taking the quality results etc., using some techniques.  Every decision making can be considered as the choice from the set of alternatives based on a set of criteria.  The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is a multi-criteria decision making and is dealing with decision making problems through pairwise comparisons mode [10].  The weight vectors from this comparison model are obtained by using extent analysis method.  This paper concern with an alternate method of finding the weight vectors from the original fuzzy AHP decision model (moderate fuzzy AHP model), that has the same rank as obtained in original fuzzy AHP and ideal fuzzy AHP decision models.

A Soft Hierarchical Process Approach for Decision Making in A Supply Chain

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1and2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Dhingra ◽  
Preetvanti Singh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Process Approach ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Conflicting Objectives ◽  
Realistic View ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pair Wise Comparison ◽  
Supplier Selection Problem ◽  
Selection Of

Decision problems are usually complex and involve evaluation of several conflicting criteria (parameters). Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is a promising field that considers the parallel influence of all criteria and aims at helping decision makers in expressing their preferences, over a set of predefined alternatives, on the basis of criteria (parameters) that are contradictory in nature. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a useful and widespread MCDM tool for solving such type of problems, as it allows the incorporation of conflicting objectives and decision makers preferences in the decision making. The AHP utilizes the concept of pair wise comparison to find the order of criteria (parameters) and alternatives. The comparison in a pairwise manner becomes quite tedious and complex for problems having eight alternatives or more, thereby, limiting the application of AHP. This paper presents a soft hierarchical process approach based on soft set decision making which eliminates the least promising candidate alternatives and selects the optimum(potential) ones that results in the significant reduction in the number of pairwise comparisons necessary for the selection of the best alternative using AHP, giving the approach a more realistic view. A supplier selection problem is used to illustrate the proposed approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document