Study on Shale Gas Drilling Fluids Technology

2013 ◽  
Vol 868 ◽  
pp. 651-656
Author(s):  
Gang Xie ◽  
Ming Yi Deng ◽  
Jun Lin Su ◽  
Liang Chun Pu

Via discussing the advantages and disadvantages of different types of oil-based drilling fluids, the main reason why oil-based drilling fluids are less used in our country is obtained that dont form a complete series of matching technology. The essence of wellbore instability caused by using water-based drilling fluids to drill shale is analyzed that the formation collapse pressure is greater than drilling fluids column pressure. The fundamental way of controlling borehole wall stability that use water-based drilling fluids to drill shale horizontal well was proposed that deeply researched the shale hydration mechanism, developed efficient blocking agent and inhibitors and established shale gas drilling fluid suppression system, which made water-based drilling fluids have excellent performance.

2015 ◽  
Vol 1113 ◽  
pp. 617-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Safwan Zazarli Shah ◽  
Arina Sauki ◽  
Wan Zairani Wan Bakar ◽  
Nurul Aimi Ghazali ◽  
Azlinda Azizi

Shale gas nowadays is an important source of unconventional gas. The limited conventional gas supply makes the unconventional sources as a new source of gas. In this research, the aim is to design a mud formulation that can carry out essential functions of mud for shale gas drilling. Commonly for shale gas drilling, water based mud is used. However, water based mud is ineffective when dealing with water-sensitive shale. The alternative way to deal with this type of shale is using synthetic-based mud (SBM) or oil-based mud (OBM). OBM is an effective mud while drilling well. However, it is toxic and gives negative impact to environment. SBM somehow is more environmental friendly compared to oil based and ester is one of the synthetic based fluids. In order to prove this statement, a toxicity test was carried out to investigate the impact of ester based mud on selected marine life. The results of the test were compared with past research results. The ester use in this research is methyl-ester C12-C14 derived from palm oil and the mud was formulated at different oil-water ratios which are 70/30, 80/20 and 90/10, respectively and the best rheological performance can be seen at 80/20 oil-water ratio. Then, the performance of this mud had been compared to other types of mud which are sarapar-based and WBM. The findings revealed that the rheological performance of ester based mud is comparable with common based mud used for shale gas drilling. Apart from that, it is less toxic than other based mud which can maintain 60% prawn’s survival even after 96 hours exposure in 100,000 ppm of mud concentration in artificial seawater.


Author(s):  
Bunyami Shafie ◽  
Lee Huei Hong ◽  
Phene Neoh Pei Nee ◽  
Fatin Hana Naning ◽  
Tze Jin Wong ◽  
...  

Drilling mud is a dense, viscous fluid mixture used in oil and gas drilling operations to bring rock cuttings to the earth's surface from the boreholes as well as to lubricate and cool the drill bit. Water-based mud is commonly used due to its relatively inexpensive and easy to dispose of. However, several components and additives in the muds become increasingly cautious and restricted. Starch was introduced as a safe and biodegradable additive into the water-based drilling fluid, in line with an environmental health concern. In this study, the suitability of four local rice flours and their heat moistures derivatives to be incorporated in the formulation of water-based drilling fluid was investigated. They were selected due to their natural amylose contents (waxy, low, intermediate, and high). They were also heat moisture treated to increase their amylose contents. Results showed that the addition of the rice flours into water-based mud significantly reduced the density, viscosity, and filtrate volume. However, the gel strength of the mud was increased. The rice flours, either native or heat moisture treated, could serve as additives to provide a variety of low cost and environmentally friendly drilling fluids to be incorporated and fitted into different drilling activity.


Author(s):  
Arina Sauki ◽  
Mohamad Safwan Zazarli Shah ◽  
Wan Zairani Wan Bakar

Desalination ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 366 ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Chen ◽  
Zhouwei Wang ◽  
Long D. Nghiem ◽  
Xue-Mei Li ◽  
Ming Xie ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1644
Author(s):  
Camilo Pedrosa ◽  
Arild Saasen ◽  
Bjørnar Lund ◽  
Jan David Ytrehus

The cuttings transport efficiency of various drilling fluids has been studied in several approaches. This is an important aspect, since hole cleaning is often a bottleneck in well construction. The studies so far have targeted the drilling fluid cuttings’ transport capability through experiments, simulations or field data. Observed differences in the efficiency due to changes in the drilling fluid properties and compositions have been reported but not always fully understood. In this study, the cuttings bed, wetted with a single drilling fluid, was evaluated. The experiments were performed with parallel plates in an Anton Paar Physica 301 rheometer. The results showed systematic differences in the internal friction behaviors between tests of beds with oil-based and beds with water-based fluids. The observations indicated that cutting beds wetted with a polymeric water-based fluid released clusters of particles when external forces overcame the bonding forces and the beds started to break up. Similarly, it was observed that an oil-based fluid wetted bed allowed particles to break free as single particles. These findings may explain the observed differences in previous cutting transport studies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arild Saasen

Controlling the annular frictional pressure losses is important in order to drill safely with overpressure without fracturing the formation. To predict these pressure losses, however, is not straightforward. First of all, the pressure losses depend on the annulus eccentricity. Moving the drillstring to the wall generates a wider flow channel in part of the annulus which reduces the frictional pressure losses significantly. The drillstring motion itself also affects the pressure loss significantly. The drillstring rotation, even for fairly small rotation rates, creates unstable flow and sometimes turbulence in the annulus even without axial flow. Transversal motion of the drillstring creates vortices that destabilize the flow. Consequently, the annular frictional pressure loss is increased even though the drilling fluid becomes thinner because of added shear rate. Naturally, the rheological properties of the drilling fluid play an important role. These rheological properties include more properties than the viscosity as measured by API procedures. It is impossible to use the same frictional pressure loss model for water based and oil based drilling fluids even if their viscosity profile is equal because of the different ways these fluids build viscosity. Water based drilling fluids are normally constructed as a polymer solution while the oil based are combinations of emulsions and dispersions. Furthermore, within both water based and oil based drilling fluids there are functional differences. These differences may be sufficiently large to require different models for two water based drilling fluids built with different types of polymers. In addition to these phenomena washouts and tool joints will create localised pressure losses. These localised pressure losses will again be coupled with the rheological properties of the drilling fluids. In this paper, all the above mentioned phenomena and their consequences for annular pressure losses will be discussed in detail. North Sea field data is used as an example. It is not straightforward to build general annular pressure loss models. This argument is based on flow stability analysis and the consequences of using drilling fluids with different rheological properties. These different rheological properties include shear dependent viscosity, elongational viscosity and other viscoelastic properties.


Author(s):  
E.A. Flik ◽  
◽  
Y.E. Kolodyazhnaya

The article assesses the environmental safety of drilling fluids that are currently widely used in the oil and gas industry. It shows active development of water-based drilling fluid systems using xanthan biopolymer.


Author(s):  
Jan David Ytrehus ◽  
Ali Taghipour ◽  
Sneha Sayindla ◽  
Bjørnar Lund ◽  
Benjamin Werner ◽  
...  

One important requirement for a drilling fluid is the ability to transport the cuttings out of the borehole. Improved hole cleaning is a key to solve several challenges in the drilling industry and will allow both longer wells and improved quality of well construction. It has been observed, however, that drilling fluids with similar properties according to the API standard can have significantly different behavior with respect to hole cleaning performance. The reasons for this are not fully understood. This paper presents results from flow loop laboratory tests without and with injected cuttings size particles using a base oil and a commercial oil based drilling fluid. The results demonstrate the importance of the rheological properties of the fluids for the hole cleaning performance. A thorough investigation of the viscoelastic properties of the fluids was performed with a Fann viscometer and a Paar-Physica rheometer, and was used to interpret the results from the flow loop experiments. Improved understanding of the fluid properties relevant to hole cleaning performance will help develop better models of wellbore hydraulics used in planning of well operations. Eventually this may lead to higher ROP with water based drilling fluids as obtained with oil based drilling fluids. This may ease cuttings handling in many operations and thereby significantly reduce the drilling cost using (normally) more environmentally friendly fluids. The experiments have been conducted as part of an industry-sponsored research project where understanding the hole cleaning performance of various oil and water based drilling fluids is the aim. The experiments have been performed under realistic conditions. The flow loop includes a 10 meter long test section with 2″ OD freely rotating drillstring inside a 4″ ID wellbore made of concrete. Sand particles were injected while circulating the drilling fluid through the test section in horizontal position.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document