Study of the Underground Placement of a Reinforced Concrete Containment Building

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 35-44
Author(s):  
Jakub Holan ◽  
Petr Bíly ◽  
Radek Štefan

Nowadays, the safety of nuclear power plants is of increasing interest and importance. The main reasons for increased safety concerns are the recent major nuclear accident in Fukushima in 2011 and the overall tendency of environment protection. One of the possible ways of increasing the safety of nuclear power plants is the underground placement of all potentially dangerous systems under ground as the overlying soil or rock layer would act as a "earth" containment which would reduce the probability of ground level release following primary and secondary containment failure. Moreover, partial or total underground placement of nuclear power plant would reduce its visibility, and thus, public concerns would also be reduced. However, many design, operational, and economic disadvantages are linked with the underground placement of nuclear power plants. The aim of this paper is to provide state-of-the-art review of existing underground nuclear reactors, conceptual designs of underground nuclear reactors, and related literature, which can later be used for the design of a underground reinforced concrete containment building.

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 685-698
Author(s):  
Yu. M. Brodov ◽  
K. E. Aronson ◽  
A. Yu. Ryabchikov ◽  
M. A. Nirenshtein ◽  
I. B. Murmanskii ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (733) ◽  
pp. 433-440
Author(s):  
Hideyoshi WATANABE ◽  
Masahiko WATANABE ◽  
Hideo HIRAI ◽  
Kunihiko SATO ◽  
Tetsuo IMAOKA ◽  
...  

Structures ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 732-746
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sadiq ◽  
Wasim Khaliq ◽  
Muhammad Ilyas ◽  
Rao Arsalan Khushnood ◽  
Shaukat Ali Khan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Florentine KOPPENBORG

Abstract The March 2011 nuclear accident (3.11) shook Japan’s nuclear energy policy to its core. In 2012, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) returned to government with a pro-nuclear policy and the intention to swiftly restart nuclear power plants. In 2020, however, only six nuclear reactors were in operation. Why has the progress of nuclear restarts been so slow despite apparent political support? This article investigates the process of restarting nuclear power plants. The key finding is that the ‘nuclear village’, centered on the LDP, Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry, and the nuclear industry, which previously controlled both nuclear policy goal-setting and implementation, remained in charge of policy decision making, i.e. goal-setting, but lost policy implementation power to an extended conflict over nuclear reactor restarts. The main factors that changed the politics of nuclear reactor restarts are Japan’s new nuclear safety agency, the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA), and a substantial increase in the number of citizens’ class-action lawsuits against nuclear reactors. These findings highlight the importance of assessing both decision making and implementation in assessments of policy change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document